Abstract
Background: Endometrial cancer is one of the most common malignancies among women worldwide. Although this cancer is often diagnosed at early stages, the need for biomarkers of diagnosis remains a necessity to overcome conventional invasive procedures of diagnosis.
Objective: In our study, we aim to investigate the diagnostic value of microRNA-21 in endometrial cancer and its relation to clinicopathological features.
Methods: We used RT-qPCR to measure the expression of microRNA-21 in 71 tumor tissues, 53 adjacent tissues, and 54 benign lesions.
Results: Our results show that microRNA-21 is a potential biomarker for endometrial cancer with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.925 (95% CI = 0.863 - 0.964, P<0.0001). The sensitivity was 84.51% (95% CI = 74.0 - 92.0) and specificity was 86.79% (95% CI = 74.7 - 94.5). For discrimination between benign lesions and controls the AUC was 0,881 with a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI = 93.4 - 100.0) and specificity of 66.04% (95% CI = 51.7 - 78.5), and for discriminating benign lesions from tumors the AUC was 0,750 with a sensitivity of 54.93% (95% CI = 42.7 - 66.8) and specificity of 90.74% (95% CI = 79.7 - 96.9). We also found that tumors with elevated microRNA-21 expression are of advanced FIGO stage, high histological grades, and have cervical invasion, myometrial invasion and distant metastasis.
Conclusion: Our findings support the important role of miR-21 as a biomarker to diagnose endometrial cancer. Further studies on minimally invasive/noninvasive samples such as serum, blood, and urine are necessary to provide a better alternative to current diagnosis methods.
Keywords: Biomarker, clinicopathological features, diagnosis, endometrial cancer, microRNAs, RT-qPCR.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.21332] [PMID: 26742998]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182605bf1] [PMID: 22825101]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14737159.2016.1258302] [PMID: 27817223]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dna.2018.4441] [PMID: 30585737]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10694] [PMID: 31579409]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-18-0267] [PMID: 30093563]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BSR20190077]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1499] [PMID: 19887623]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.04.011] [PMID: 24035473]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41419-018-1182-9] [PMID: 30464258]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.9843] [PMID: 30675287]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.26355/EURREV_201811_16395]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omtn.2020.03.003] [PMID: 32244168]
[PMID: 31966504]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2012.896] [PMID: 23226804]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2012.111] [PMID: 22766795]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0b013e318200050e] [PMID: 21330826]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.12028] [PMID: 27655698]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1261/rna.1034808] [PMID: 18812439]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djt101] [PMID: 23704278]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2010.01.018] [PMID: 20363096]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2013.12.04] [PMID: 24385703]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10238-014-0332-3] [PMID: 25516467]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/CBM-140437] [PMID: 25524942]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13277-014-2106-7] [PMID: 24880588]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000323283] [PMID: 21412018]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/or_00000270] [PMID: 19212625]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/CGO.2019.0004]