Abstract
Background: The incidence rate of renal disease is high, which can cause end-stage renal disease. Ultrasound is a commonly used imaging method, including conventional ultrasound, color ultrasound, elastography, etc. Machine learning is a potential method which has been widely used in clinical practices.
Objective: To compare the diagnostic performance of different ultrasonic image measurement parameters for kidney diseases, and to compare different machine learning methods with the human- reading method.
Methods: Ninety-four patients with pathologically diagnosed renal diseases and 109 normal controls were included in this study. The patients were examined by conventional ultrasound, color ultrasound and shear wave elasticity, respectively. Ultrasonic data were analyzed by Support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), K-nearest neighbor (KNN) and artificial neural network (ANN), respectively, and compared with the human-reading method.
Results: Only ultrasound elastography data have a diagnostic value for renal diseases. The accuracy of SVM, RF, KNN and ANN methods is 80.98%, 80.32%, 78.03% and 79.67%, respectively, while the accuracy of human-reading is 78.33%. In the data of machine learning ultrasound elastography, the elastic hardness parameters of the renal cortex are most important.
Conclusion: Ultrasound elastography is of the highest diagnostic value in machine learning for nephropathy, the diagnostic efficiency of the machine learning method is slightly higher than that of the human-reading method, and the diagnostic ability of the SVM method is higher than other methods.
Keywords: Renal disease, ultrasound image, diagnosis, machine learning, elastography, support vector machine.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168537] [PMID: 28045985]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201400108] [PMID: 25412100]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.11152/mu.2013.2066.171.smd] [PMID: 25745661]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.001593] [PMID: 26572668]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-748-8_7] [PMID: 24272434]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.09.025] [PMID: 20971591]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.11152/mu.2013.2066.183.per] [PMID: 27622414]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1847-2] [PMID: 29047410]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2014.11.005] [PMID: 25750696]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194479] [PMID: 29570705]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2014.7044287]