Abstract
This work deals with the use of predictors to identify useful B-cell linear epitopes to develop immunoassays. Experimental techniques to meet this goal are quite expensive and time consuming. Therefore, we tested 5 free, online prediction methods (AAPPred, ABCpred, BcePred, BepiPred and Antigenic) widely used for predicting linear epitopes, using the primary structure of the protein as the only input. We chose a set of 65 experimentally well documented epitopes obtained by the most reliable experimental techniques as our true positive set. To compare the quality of the predictor methods we used their positive predictive value (PPV), i.e. the proportion of the predicted epitopes that are true, experimentally confirmed epitopes, in relation to all the epitopes predicted. We conclude that AAPPred and ABCpred yield the best results as compared with the other programs and with a random prediction procedure. Our results also indicate that considering the consensual epitopes predicted by several programs does not improve the PPV.
Keywords: Diagnostic, epitope, immunochemical, linear B-cell epitopes, prediction, program, reagents.
Protein & Peptide Letters
Title:Evaluation and Comparison of the Ability of Online Available Prediction Programs to Predict True Linear B-cell Epitopes
Volume: 20 Issue: 6
Author(s): Juan G. Costa, Pablo L. Faccendini, Silvano J. Sferco, Claudia M. Lagier and Ivan S. Marcipar
Affiliation:
Keywords: Diagnostic, epitope, immunochemical, linear B-cell epitopes, prediction, program, reagents.
Abstract: This work deals with the use of predictors to identify useful B-cell linear epitopes to develop immunoassays. Experimental techniques to meet this goal are quite expensive and time consuming. Therefore, we tested 5 free, online prediction methods (AAPPred, ABCpred, BcePred, BepiPred and Antigenic) widely used for predicting linear epitopes, using the primary structure of the protein as the only input. We chose a set of 65 experimentally well documented epitopes obtained by the most reliable experimental techniques as our true positive set. To compare the quality of the predictor methods we used their positive predictive value (PPV), i.e. the proportion of the predicted epitopes that are true, experimentally confirmed epitopes, in relation to all the epitopes predicted. We conclude that AAPPred and ABCpred yield the best results as compared with the other programs and with a random prediction procedure. Our results also indicate that considering the consensual epitopes predicted by several programs does not improve the PPV.
Export Options
About this article
Cite this article as:
Costa Juan G., Faccendini Pablo L., Sferco Silvano J., Lagier Claudia M. and Marcipar Ivan S., Evaluation and Comparison of the Ability of Online Available Prediction Programs to Predict True Linear B-cell Epitopes, Protein & Peptide Letters 2013; 20 (6) . https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/0929866511320060011
DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/0929866511320060011 |
Print ISSN 0929-8665 |
Publisher Name Bentham Science Publisher |
Online ISSN 1875-5305 |
- Author Guidelines
- Graphical Abstracts
- Fabricating and Stating False Information
- Research Misconduct
- Post Publication Discussions and Corrections
- Publishing Ethics and Rectitude
- Increase Visibility of Your Article
- Archiving Policies
- Peer Review Workflow
- Order Your Article Before Print
- Promote Your Article
- Manuscript Transfer Facility
- Editorial Policies
- Allegations from Whistleblowers
Related Articles
-
New Developments In Treatment After Lung Transplantation
Current Pharmaceutical Design Anticipating a Post COVID-19 World and the Pivotal Role of Science and Technology
Coronaviruses Outbreak of Respiratory Infection: nCoV-2019 Current Status and Its Impact on Global Health
Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews Proteomic and Bioinformatics Tools to Understand Virulence Mechanisms in Staphylococcus aureus
Current Proteomics Catechin Derivatives as Inhibitor of COVID-19 Main Protease (Mpro): Molecular Docking Studies Unveil an Opportunity Against CORONA
Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening WITHDRAWAL NOTICE: Review of the Times When One-Third of the Mankind is Under Lockdown Due to Coronavirus
Coronaviruses Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of COVID-19: A Nanotechnological Perspective
Current Nanoscience Discovery of Potent SARS-CoV-2 Inhibitors from Approved Antiviral Drugs via Docking and Virtual Screening
Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening The Role of Tocilizumab in Cytokine Storm and Improving Outcomes in COVID-19
Recent Patents on Anti-Infective Drug Discovery A Patient with COVID-19 Pneumonia Presenting with Plural Effusion: A Case Report
Infectious Disorders - Drug Targets Potential Repurposing of Drugs with Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Activity in Preclinical Trials: A Systematic Review
Current Medicinal Chemistry The Effectiveness and Safety of Remdesivir for the Treatment of Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Anti-Infective Agents Structural Biology Aids the Research of New Anti-COVID-19 Drugs
Current Organic Synthesis Utilizing Zebrafish Animal Model as a Helping Hand for COVID-19 Infection
Coronaviruses <i>In-silico</i> Discovery of Fungal Metabolites Bergenin, Quercitrin and Dihydroartemisinin as Potential Inhibitors against Main Protease of SARSCoV- 2
Coronaviruses Management of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials Mass Spectrometry, Proteomics, Data Mining Strategies and Their Applications in Infectious Disease Research.
Anti-Infective Agents in Medicinal Chemistry Synthesis and Antiviral Activity of 2-aryl-4H-chromen-4-one Derivatives Against Chikungunya Virus
Letters in Drug Design & Discovery Rapid Response Research - SARS Coronavirus Vaccines and Application of Processes to Other Emerging Infectious Diseases
Current Immunology Reviews (Discontinued) Cyclophilin function in Cancer; lessons from virus replication
Current Molecular Pharmacology