Generic placeholder image

Current Diabetes Reviews

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-3998
ISSN (Online): 1875-6417

Research Article

Evaluation of General Health Status in Diabetic Patients Using Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)

Author(s): Ali Shlash Al-Ibrahimy and Ihsan Salah Rabea*

Volume 19, Issue 9, 2023

Published on: 10 April, 2023

Article ID: e081420184858 Pages: 6

DOI: 10.2174/1573399816666200814133535

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study is to assess the general health of diabetic type 2 patients by using SF-36 and also to find if there was an association between the scores of eight domains of this tool with disease-specific and demographic variables.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate the general health of patients with diabetes mellitus type 2. The participants of the present study were randomly selected from rural and urban areas. The diabetic patients visiting community pharmacies in these areas were invited to participate in this study after explaining the goal of the study. A self-reported questionnaire in the Arabic version of the medical outcome survey, the Short-Form (36-item), was conducted. However, uneducated patients were interviewed by trained pharmacists in the community pharmacies.

Results and Discussion: Two hundred confirmed DM patients were enrolled in this study with a mean age of (50.65 ± 8.914 years). 142 (71%) were male and the remaining 58 (29%) were female. The scores of all domains of SF-36 were significantly lower (p < 0.05) in female patients in comparison to that recorded in men. In addition, diabetic patients aged more than 50 years showed significantly lower scores of most domains of SF-36 (p < 0.05) except for emotional well-being (p > 0.05). The multivariate linear regression analysis demonstrated that gender, age, and treatment type were independent of health status based on the SF-36 survey, while emotional well-being, social functioning, and pain were exceptional.

Conclusion: The outcomes of this study showed a negative correlation between diabetes mellitus and the health status as measured by SF-36. Furthermore, excluding emotional well-being, social functioning, and pain domains, the other parameters of gender, age, and treatment type showed a significant correlation with health status.

[1]
Degu H, Wondimagegnehu A, Yifru YM, Belachew A. Is health related quality of life influenced by diabetic neuropathic pain among type II diabetes mellitus patients in Ethiopia? PLoS One 2019; 14(2): e0211449.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211449] [PMID: 30716109]
[2]
International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas. (9th ed.), 2019.
[3]
de la Cruz JPS, Morales DLG, González-Castro TB, et al. Quality of life of Latin-American individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review. Prim Care Diabetes 2020; 14(4): 317-34.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2019.09.003] [PMID: 31564515]
[4]
Mokhtari Z, Gheshlagh RG, Kurdi A. Health-related quality of life in Iranian patients with type 2 diabetes: An updated meta-analysis. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2019; 13(1): 402-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2018.10.007] [PMID: 30641733]
[5]
Goel M, Dhuldhule S, Prakash A, Ghotekar LH. Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with diabetes mellitus at a Tertiary Care Center in Central Delhi. Indian J Community Med 2019; 44(2): 171-2.
[PMID: 31333300]
[6]
Kooshyar H, Shoorvazi M, Dalir Z, Hosseini M. Health literacy and its relationship with medical adherence and health-related quality of life in diabetic community-residing elderly. Majallah-i Danishgah-i Ulum-i Pizishki-i Mazandaran 2014; 23(1): 134-43.
[7]
Karimi Moghadam S, Lael- Monfared E, Barghbani R, Ghezekgharshi MR, Rajabzadeh R, Robat sarpooshi. sarpooshi, D.A survey on the relationship between quality of life of patients with type 2 diabetes and some of the demographic parameters in patients referred to the diabetes clinic of sabzevar summary. Iran J Diabetes Metabol 2017; 16(6): 323e33.
[8]
Woodcock AJ, Julious SA, Kinmonth AL, Campbell MJ. Diabetes Care From Diagnosis Group. Problems with the performance of the SF-36 among people with type 2 diabetes in general practice. Qual Life Res 2001; 10(8): 661-70.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1013837709224] [PMID: 11871587]
[9]
Fisher L, Tang T, Polonsky W. Assessing quality of life in diabetes: I. A practical guide to selecting the best instruments and using them wisely. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2017; 126: 278-85.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2016.10.018] [PMID: 28153545]
[10]
Gibbons E, Fitzpatrick R. A structured review of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for diabetes. Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Group 2009.
[11]
Speight J, Reaney MD, Barnard KD. Not all roads lead to Rome-a review of quality of life measurement in adults with diabetes. Diabet Med 2009; 26(4): 315-27.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02682.x] [PMID: 19388959]
[12]
Norris SL, McNally TK, Zhang X, et al. Published norms underestimate the health-related quality of life among persons with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64(4): 358-65.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.016] [PMID: 20800442]
[13]
Svedbo Engström M, Leksell J, Johansson UB, et al. Health-related quality of life and glycaemic control among adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes - A nationwide cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2019; 17(1): 141.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1212-z] [PMID: 31412881]
[14]
Bjorner JB, Lyng Wolden M, Gundgaard J, Miller KA, Miller K. Benchmarks for interpretation of score differences on the SF-36 health survey for patients with diabetes. Value Health 2013; 16(6): 993-1000.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2013.06.022] [PMID: 24041349]
[15]
American Diabetes Association. Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: Standards of medical Care in Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2019; 42 (Suppl. 1): S90-S102.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc19-S009] [PMID: 30559235]
[16]
Al-Tukmagi HF, Al-Ibrahimy AS. Assessing quality of life among patients with diabetes mellitus, hypertension or both diseases in Al-Najaf province/Iraq. Iraqi J Pharm Sci 2017; 26(2): 29-40.
[17]
Marinho FS, Moram CBM, Rodrigues PC, Leite NC, Salles GF, Cardoso CRL. Treatment adherence and its associated factors in patients with type 2 diabetes: results from the rio de janeiro type 2 diabetes cohort study. J Diabetes Res 2018; 2018: 8970196.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8970196] [PMID: 30599003]
[18]
Huang IC, Hwang CC, Wu MY, Lin W, Leite W, Wu AW. Diabetes-specific or generic measures for health-related quality of life? Evidence from psychometric validation of the D-39 and SF-36. Value Health 2008; 11(3): 450-61.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00261.x] [PMID: 18489668]
[19]
Sheikh KA, Yagoub U, Elsatouhy M, Al Sanosi R, Mohamud SA. Reliability and validity of the Arabic version of the SF-36 health survey questionnaire in population of khat chewers-jazan region-kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Appl Res Qual Life 2015; 10(1): 1-13.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11482-013-9291-1]
[20]
Al Robaee AA. Assessment of general health and quality of life in patients with acne using a validated generic questionnaire. Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Panonica Adriat 2009; 18(4): 157-64.
[PMID: 20043053]
[21]
Ware JE Jr. SF-36 health survey update. Spine 2000; 25(24): 3130-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00008] [PMID: 11124729]
[22]
Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life: assessment, analysis and interpretation. Chichester, New York 2000.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/0470846283]
[23]
Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global prevalence of diabetes: Estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 2004; 27(5): 1047-53.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/diacare.27.5.1047] [PMID: 15111519]
[24]
Chawla A, Chawla R, Jaggi S. Microvasular and macrovascular complications in diabetes mellitus: Distinct or continuum? Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2016; 20(4): 546-51.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.183480] [PMID: 27366724]
[25]
Al Hayek AA, Robert AA, Al Saeed A, Alzaid AA, Al Sabaan FS. Factors associated with health-related quality of life among Saudi patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional survey. Diabetes Metab J 2014; 38(3): 220-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2014.38.3.220] [PMID: 25003076]
[26]
Al-Maskari MY, Al-Shookri AO, Al-Adawi SH, Lin KG. Assessment of quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Oman. Saudi Med J 2011; 32(12): 1285-90.
[PMID: 22159385]
[27]
Dehesh P, Dehesh T, Gozashti MH. Evaluating the direct and indirect effects of SF-36 domains score on two main factors in diabetic patients with path analysis: Health-related quality of life study. Rom J Diabetes Nutr Metab Dis 2019; 26(1): 21-30.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/rjdnmd-2019-0003]
[28]
Jing X, Chen J, Dong Y, et al. Related factors of quality of life of type 2 diabetes patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2018; 16(1): 189.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-018-1021-9] [PMID: 30231882]
[29]
Rossi MC, Nicolucci A, Ozzello A, et al. HYPOS-1 Study Group of AMD. Impact of severe and symptomatic hypoglycemia on quality of life and fear of hypoglycemia in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Results of the Hypos-1 observational study. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2019; 29(7): 736-43.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2019.04.009] [PMID: 31153746]
[30]
Arditi C, Zanchi A, Peytremann-Bridevaux I. Health status and quality of life in patients with diabetes in Switzerland. Prim Care Diabetes 2019; 13(3): 233-41.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2018.11.016] [PMID: 30583932]
[31]
Bao XY, Xie YX, Zhang XX, et al. The association between multimorbidity and health-related quality of life: A cross-sectional survey among community middle-aged and elderly residents in Southern China. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2019; 17(1): 107.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1175-0] [PMID: 31234889]

© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy