Abstract
Background: The present study aims to compare the relative efficacy and safety of different uses of cyclophosphamide (CYC) in lupus nephritis (LN).
Methods: We searched the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Global Health, MEDLINE and PubMed for articles from the database till June 2018.
Results: 12 randomized controlled trials with 994 participants were included. The meta-analysis indicated that the short-interval lower-dose intravenous CYC regime remarkably reduced 24-hour proteinuria [mean difference (MD) -0.45; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.62 to -0.27; I2 0%], incidence of major infections [odds ratio (OR) 0.62, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.95; I2 42%], gonadal toxicity (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.62; I2 0%), and leukopenia (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.94, I2 0%), while high-dose regime had an obvious lower probability of doubling of serum creatinine (Scr) level (OR 2.43; 95% CI 1.19 to 4.95; I2 0%). However, the difference in the complete and total remission rates between the two regimens was not observed.
Conclusion: The result suggested that the short-interval lower-dose CYC regime remarkably reduced 24-hour proteinuria and the incidence of adverse events, while the long-course high-dose regime played a significant role in reducing the rate of doubling Scr level.
Keywords: Lupus nephritis, cyclophosphamide, randomized controlled trails, proteinuria, serum creatinine, usage.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S28034] [PMID: 22675266]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.38006] [PMID: 23754671]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00467-004-1553-6] [PMID: 15257454]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198603063141004] [PMID: 3511372]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-125-7-199610010-00003] [PMID: 8815753]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-135-4-200108210-00009] [PMID: 11511139]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1529-0131(199805)41:5<831:AID-ART9>3.0.CO;2-1] [PMID: 9588734]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009408] [PMID: 29390559]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201940] [PMID: 22851469]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557] [PMID: 12958120]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-5] [PMID: 17244367]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(92)92292-N] [PMID: 1356175]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.10461] [PMID: 12209517]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.20666] [PMID: 15593207]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2008.102533] [PMID: 19155235]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-018-3995-3] [PMID: 29450636]
[PMID: 21912022]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11255-007-9325-4] [PMID: 18214709]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijn.IJN_2_16] [PMID: 29515299]
[PMID: 26885107]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2002.003574] [PMID: 15082482]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-014-2590-6] [PMID: 24744152]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.1780251101] [PMID: 7138600]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.1780400928] [PMID: 9324032]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr.21664] [PMID: 22556106]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.ASN.0000108969.21691.5D] [PMID: 14747370]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/0961203305lu2060oa] [PMID: 15732289]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2010050472] [PMID: 21051743]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0961203309357763] [PMID: 20064907]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.56.8.481] [PMID: 9306871]