Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Current Medical Imaging

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4056
ISSN (Online): 1875-6603

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Research Article

Mammographic and Sonographic Features of Breast Cancer in Women Before 30 Years of Age

Author(s): Jong Soo Park, Young Seon Kim* and Seung Eun Lee

Volume 16, Issue 9, 2020

Page: [1161 - 1169] Pages: 9

DOI: 10.2174/1573405615666191018154704

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer uncommonly occurs in young women, but, tends to be diagnosed at a later stage and have a poorer prognosis than in older women. Standard screening guidelines for this age group are not established and the radiologic features of breast cancer in young women are not fully studied yet, because of the low incidence.

Objectives: To investigate the imaging findings for breast cancer in women aged 30 years or younger and to correlate them with clinicopathologic features and immunohistochemical subtypes.

Methods: The study included 52 women with surgically confirmed breast cancer. The medical records of the patients were retrospectively reviewed and the mammographic and ultrasonographic findings were evaluated according to the fifth edition of the ACR BI-RADS lexicon.

Results: Most of the tumors in this study were presented as a self-detected mass (42/52, 80.8%) and were of histologic grade III (31/43 invasive carcinoma, 72.1%) and the estrogen receptorpositive subtype (32/52, 61.5%). The most common mammographic finding was an irregular (19/24, 79.2%), indistinct (16/24, 66.7%), and hyperdense (20/24, 83.3%) mass. The ultrasonographic findings were of an irregular (32/47, 68.1%), indistinct (19/47, 40.4%), and hypoechoic/ heterogeneous (40/47, 85.1%) mass with no posterior features (34/47, 72.3%). An oval/round-shaped mass on ultrasonography was also correlated with triple-negative cancer (p=0.011).

Conclusion: On mammography and ultrasonography, breast cancer in young women usually presents as a mass with irregular shape and indistinct margin. Some radiologic findings could be used to predict the molecular phenotype of the tumor.

Keywords: Breast neoplasm, molecular subtype, mammography, ultrasonography, young women, sonographic.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
Gabriel CA, Domchek SM. Breast cancer in young women. Breast Cancer Res 2010; 12(5): 212.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr2647] [PMID: 21067532]
[2]
An YY, Kim SH, Kang BJ, Park CS, Jung NY, Kim JY. Breast cancer in very young women (<30 years): Correlation of imaging features with clinicopathological features and immunohistochemical subtypes. Eur J Radiol 2015; 84(10): 1894-902.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.07.002] [PMID: 26198117]
[3]
Anders CK, Johnson R, Litton J, Phillips M, Bleyer A. Breast cancer before age 40 years. Semin Oncol 2009; 36(3): 237-49.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.seminoncol.2009.03.001] [PMID: 19460581]
[4]
Assi HA, Khoury KE, Dbouk H, Khalil LE, Mouhieddine TH, El Saghir NS. Epidemiology and prognosis of breast cancer in young women. J Thorac Dis 2013; 5(Suppl. 1): S2-8.
[PMID: 23819024]
[5]
Fredholm H, Eaker S, Frisell J, Holmberg L, Fredriksson I, Lindman H. Breast cancer in young women: poor survival despite intensive treatment. PLoS One 2009; 4(11)e7695
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007695] [PMID: 19907646]
[6]
Han W, Kim SW, Park IA, et al. Young age: An independent risk factor for disease-free survival in women with operable breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2004; 4(1): 82.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-4-82] [PMID: 15546499]
[7]
Liu Z, Sahli Z, Wang Y, Wolff AC, Cope LM, Umbricht CB. Young age at diagnosis is associated with worse prognosis in the Luminal A breast cancer subtype: A retrospective institutional cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 172(3): 689-702.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4950-4] [PMID: 30225619]
[8]
Winchester DP, Osteen RT, Menck HR. The National Cancer Data Base report on breast carcinoma characteristics and outcome in relation to age. Cancer 1996; 78(8): 1838-43.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19961015)78:8<1838:AID-CNCR27>3.0.CO;2-Y] [PMID: 8859200]
[9]
Swanson GM, Lin CS. Survival patterns among younger women with breast cancer: The effects of age, race, stage, and treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1994; (16): 69-77.
[PMID: 7999472]
[10]
Albain KS, Allred DC, Clark GM. Breast cancer outcome and predictors of outcome: Are there age differentials? J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1994; (16): 35-42.
[PMID: 7999467]
[11]
American College of Radiology Breast imaging reporting and data system (ACR BI-RADS®Atlas). 5th ed. USA: American College of Radiology 2013.
[12]
An YY, Kim SH, Kang BJ. Characteristic features and usefulness of MRI in breast cancer in patients under 40 years old: Correlations with conventional imaging and prognostic factors. Breast Cancer 2014; 21(3): 302-15.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12282-012-0383-9] [PMID: 22723056]
[13]
Bullier B, MacGrogan G, Bonnefoi H, et al. Imaging features of sporadic breast cancer in women under 40 years old: 97 cases. Eur Radiol 2013; 23(12): 3237-45.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-2966-z] [PMID: 23918218]
[14]
Morrison DH, Rahardja D, King E, Peng Y, Sarode VR. Tumour biomarker expression relative to age and molecular subtypes of invasive breast cancer. Br J Cancer 2012; 107(2): 382-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.219] [PMID: 22713661]
[15]
Cancello G, Maisonneuve P, Rotmensz N, et al. Prognosis and adjuvant treatment effects in selected breast cancer subtypes of very young women (<35 years) with operable breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2010; 21(10): 1974-81.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdq072] [PMID: 20332136]
[16]
Sabiani L, Houvenaeghel G, Heinemann M, et al. Breast cancer in young women: Pathologic features and molecular phenotype. Breast 2016; 29: 109-16.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2016.07.007] [PMID: 27479041]
[17]
Wang K, Ren Y, Li H, et al. Comparison of clinicopathological features and treatments between young (≤40 years) and older (>40 years) female breast cancer patients in West China: A retrospective, epidemiological, multicenter, case only study. PLoS One 2016; 11(3)e0152312
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152312] [PMID: 27031236]
[18]
Shin HJ, Kim HH, Huh MO, et al. Correlation between mammographic and sonographic findings and prognostic factors in patients with node-negative invasive breast cancer. Br J Radiol 2011; 84(997): 19-30.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr/92960562] [PMID: 20682592]
[19]
Au-Yong IT, Evans AJ, Taneja S, et al. Sonographic correlations with the new molecular classification of invasive breast cancer. Eur Radiol 2009; 19(10): 2342-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1418-2] [PMID: 19440719]
[20]
Boisserie-Lacroix M, Mac Grogan G, Debled M, et al. Radiological features of triple-negative breast cancers (73 cases). Diagn Interv Imaging 2012; 93(3): 183-90.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2012.01.006] [PMID: 22421282]
[21]
Kojima Y, Tsunoda H. Mammography and ultrasound features of triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer 2011; 18(3): 146-51.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12282-010-0223-8] [PMID: 20972742]
[22]
Kim JW, Jang MJ, Kim SM, et al. Clinicopathological and imaging features of breast cancer in Korean women under 40 years of age. J Korean Soc Radiol 2017; 76(6): 375-85.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2017.76.6.375]
[23]
Uematsu T, Kasami M, Yuen S. Triple-negative breast cancer: Correlation between MR imaging and pathologic findings. Radiology 2009; 250(3): 638-47.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2503081054] [PMID: 19244039]
[24]
Bassett LW, Ysrael M, Gold RH, Ysrael C. Usefulness of mammography and sonography in women less than 35 years of age. Radiology 1991; 180(3): 831-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.180.3.1871302] [PMID: 1871302]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
Article Metrics
20
1
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy