Abstract
Objective: The study aimed to explore the efficacy of pharmacokinetic-based 5-fluorouracil dose management by plasma concentration test in advanced colorectal cancer treatment.
Methods: 153 samples of advanced colorectal cancer patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to a control group and an experimental group. All patients received double-week chemotherapy with 5- fluorouracil (four weeks were used as one period), and chemotherapy duration ranged from 2 to 6 periods. In the first period, all patients were administered with the classic strategy of body surface area (BSA).
Results: In the subsequent periods, the control group (77 samples) continued with BSA guided chemotherapy, while the experimental group (76 samples) received pharmacokinetic AUC-based chemotherapy. The efficacy and toxic side effects were assessed during chemotherapy, and survival was recorded in a follow-up. In the AUC experimental group, the rate of diarrhea significantly decreased (37.50% vs. 70.00%, P=0.010), and incidence of oral mucositis reduced (54.17% vs. 82.50%, P=0.014). Compared with the control group, the clinical benefit rate of experimental group was much higher (90.79% vs. 79.22%, P=0.046).
Conclusion: There was no significant difference in other 5-fluorouracil related toxic side effect events (nausea, vomiting, hand-foot syndrome) and progression-free survival between the two groups. Pharmacokinetic- based dose management of 5-Fluorouracil reduces the toxicity of chemotherapy and improves long-term efficacy of chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer patients.
Keywords: Colorectal cancer, 5-Fluorouracil, pharmacokinetics, cancer patients, DNA, uridylic acid.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.21338] [PMID: 26808342]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-016-3054-2] [PMID: 27217046]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/pgs.13.54] [PMID: 23651027]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0357] [PMID: 22382460]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/clpt.2013.172] [PMID: 23988873]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1533-0028(11)70480-7] [PMID: 17539192]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clcc.2013.11.001] [PMID: 24461492]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clcc.2016.04.001] [PMID: 27256667]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cbt.8.17.9283] [PMID: 19597348]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clcc.2011.03.015] [PMID: 21855044]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.24338] [PMID: 29545919]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1309/C6X54HRB580EP2NQ] [PMID: 17709317]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2006.11.004] [PMID: 17306333]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/94.24.1883] [PMID: 12488482]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1999.17.4.1105] [PMID: 10561167]