Generic placeholder image

Current Clinical Pharmacology

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1574-8847
ISSN (Online): 2212-3938

Unexpected High Levels of Vorinostat when Combined with Vinorelbine in Patients with Advanced Cancer

Author(s): Peggy Gandia, Cecile Arellano, Quentin Chalret du Rieu, Isabelle Lochon, Mario Campone, Jean-Yves Pierga, Muriel Poublanc, Isabelle Hennebelle, Thomas Filleron, Etienne Chatelut and Jean-Pierre Delord

Volume 6, Issue 4, 2011

Page: [274 - 279] Pages: 6

DOI: 10.2174/157488411798375921

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: This study was a multi-centre, dose-escalation trial in patients with advanced cancers. Primary objective was to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of vorinostat, a competitive inhibitor of histone deacetylase (HDAC), in combination with vinorelbine. Secondary aims were to determine (1) corresponding pharmacokinetics, (2) safety of this regimen, and (3) impact of UGT1A1 and 2B17 polymorphisms on vorinostat pharmacokinetics.

Methods: Starting dose of once daily oral vorinostat was 200 mg for 7 days every 21 days in combination with a 20-min intraveinous weekly infusion of vinorelbine 25 mg/m2, starting 4 hours after the first vorinostat dose. During cycle 1, blood samples were collected at day 1 for vorinostat and at days 1 and 8 for vinorelbine for pharmacokinetic evaluation.

Results: Seven patients were included. Most of adverse events observed were mild (grades 0-2) and reversible after treatment discontinuation (hemotological toxicity, asthenia, diarrhea, dyspnea, fever, hyperglycemia and nausea). Two patients had a dose limiting toxicity at the first dose level that consisted of grade 3 hyperglycemia and vinorelbine administration was delayed. The first dose-level was considered as the MDT and therefore dose escalation was stopped. Mean vorinostat plasma AUC was higher than reported previously at a similar dose when used as single agent or in combination with other cytotoxics. There was no obvious vinorelbine-vorinostat interaction nor any correlation with UGT1A1 or 2B17 polymorphisms.

Conclusion: MDT of the combination was 200 mg oral vorinostat for 7 days in combination with 25 mg/m2 weekly vinorelbine. Severity of hyperglycemia was most likely related to unexpected high vorinostat exposures.

Keywords: Vorinostat, vinorelbine, phase I, hyperglycemia, pharmacokinetics, UGT1A1 polymorphism, UGT2B17 polymorphism, advanced cancer, histone deacetylases, enzymes


Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy