Abstract
Objectives: One of the promising strategies for effective HIV-1 vaccine design involves finding the polyepitope immunogens using T cell epitopes.
Methods: Herein, an HIV-1 polyepitope construct (i.e., Nef-Tat-Gp160-P24) comprising of several epitopes from Nef, Tat, Gp160, and P24 proteins was designed. To improve its immunogenicity in BALB/c mice, cell-penetrating peptides (HR9 and MPG for DNA delivery, and LDP-NLS and Cy- LoP-1 for protein transfer), Montanide adjuvant, and heterologous DNA prime/polypeptide boost strategy were used. To compare the immunogenicity, Nef was utilized as a vaccine candidate. The levels of total IgG and its subclasses, cytokines, and Granzyme B were assessed using ELISA.
Results: Immunological studies showed that heterologous prime-boost regimens for both antigens could considerably augment the levels of IgG2a, IgG2b, IFN-γ, and Granzyme B directed toward Th1 and CTL immune responses in comparison with homologous prime-boost strategies. The levels of IFN-γ, IL-10, total IgG, IgG1, and IgG2b were drastically higher in groups immunized with Nef-Tat-Gp160-P24 in heterologous prime-boost regimens than those in groups immunized with Nef.
Conclusion: The use of the Nef-Tat-Gp160-P24 polyepitope immunogen in heterologous primeboost strategy could generate the mixture of Th1 and Th2 responses directed further toward Th1 response as a hopeful method for improvement of HIV-1 vaccine.
Keywords: HIV-1, Therapeutic vaccine, Polyepitope construct, Prime/boost strategy, Cell-penetrating peptides, Adjuvant.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00749] [PMID: 31024510]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2019.103791] [PMID: 31606417]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19041241] [PMID: 29671786]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines7030083] [PMID: 31390770]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/503978] [PMID: 25861656]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61591-3] [PMID: 19012954]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61592-5] [PMID: 19012957]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1161000] [PMID: 18653883]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/272950] [PMID: 25136573]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0908492] [PMID: 19843557]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro878] [PMID: 15100693]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2019.1666957] [PMID: 31584318]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imr.12504] [PMID: 28133804]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2016.02.002] [PMID: 26922989]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184207] [PMID: 28863168]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/14760584.6.2.125] [PMID: 17408360]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31269-5_9]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/282913] [PMID: 23710439]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.11.062] [PMID: 26691569]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17425247.2019.1676720] [PMID: 31583914]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2012.05.053] [PMID: 22669044]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2004.09.010]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2017.01.012] [PMID: 28159722]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2016.11.002] [PMID: 27836642]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1570162X17666191121114522] [PMID: 31755394]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prot.25609] [PMID: 30260061]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imlet.2017.06.003] [PMID: 28602843]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/JoMMID.7.4.107]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5SC03892H] [PMID: 28791117]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2004.09.043] [PMID: 15680412]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2014.02.002] [PMID: 24802661]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9413-4]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/JBSA2015.0101]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx345] [PMID: 28575391]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.03.042] [PMID: 29571972]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines4020012] [PMID: 27104575]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.77031]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1348-0421.12436] [PMID: 27554419]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2017.10.022] [PMID: 29107145]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2019.01.016] [PMID: 30639295]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2017.02.007] [PMID: 28185986]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.166.9.5366] [PMID: 11313372]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0300-9475.2004.01442.x] [PMID: 15320877]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01022] [PMID: 28642743]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013540] [PMID: 21085635]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-08-038661] [PMID: 17158230]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/mt.2016.3] [PMID: 26743582]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1517/14712598.2014.885946] [PMID: 24490585]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/mt.2013.248] [PMID: 24166483]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00002030-199301001-00003] [PMID: 8363784]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2015.1094595] [PMID: 26430814]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a007054] [PMID: 23002014]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00005-010-0067-0] [PMID: 20155490]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00020-15] [PMID: 25741000]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2017.1281488] [PMID: 28281860]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molimm.2020.01.013] [PMID: 32007753]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sji.12184] [PMID: 24813074]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imlet.2017.09.005] [PMID: 28917624]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/iub.2107] [PMID: 31220406]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-6113.1000440]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13721-016-0138-1]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/14760584.1.1.111] [PMID: 12908518]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/499823] [PMID: 16425136]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.07.034] [PMID: 18675871]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coi.2009.05.016] [PMID: 19500964]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2019.1640117] [PMID: 31271322]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emmm.201403876] [PMID: 24803000]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.12.024] [PMID: 18243434]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084234] [PMID: 24391921]