Abstract
Objective: To analyze the association between serum levels of osteoprotegerin (OPG) and Dickkopf-related protein 1 (DKK-1) and the annual percent change (Δ%) in bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with tightly controlled rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Methods: Observational mixed-study. RA patients followed-up with a tight-control strategy were included. Bone densitometries were performed at baseline (T0) and follow-up (T1) and serum levels of OPG and DKK-1 were measured by ELISA also in T0 and T1; additional clinical variables included disease activity measures, and treatment for RA and osteoporosis. Descriptive bivariate and multivariate analyses, stratified by gender, were performed.
Results: We included 97 RA patients (70% female, with a mean age of 53 years, and 76% with low activity by DAS28); 95% were treated with DMARDs and 37% with anti-osteoporotic drugs. Mean time between T0 and T1 was 2.7 years. Most patients had their BMD improved. The mean Δ%BMD was +0.42% for lumbar spine, +0.15% for femoral neck and +0.91% for total femur. In men, baseline OPG was significantly associated with higher BMD loss (β coefficient -0.64) at the femoral neck. In women, DKK-1 was associated with higher BMD loss at the femoral neck (β coefficient -0.09), and total femur (β coefficient -0.11); however, DKK-1 was associated with lower BMD loss at the lumbar spine (β coefficient 0.06).
Conclusion: In tightly controlled RA patients, we have found no evidence of bone loss. The role of DKK1 and OPG seems small and might be related to sex and location.
Keywords: Rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis, bone density, osteoprotegerin, DKK-1, β coefficient.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11926-012-0253-7] [PMID: 22527950]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-013-2334-5] [PMID: 23775419]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1529-0131(200003)43:3<522::AID-ANR7>3.0.CO;2-Y] [PMID: 10728744]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0025-7753(00)71329-7] [PMID: 10846698]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.22117] [PMID: 17009229]
[PMID: 11093437]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1319-x] [PMID: 20552328]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reuma.2013.02.008] [PMID: 23727459]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.21896] [PMID: 16736519]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-011-2175-5] [PMID: 22057136]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2010.135061] [PMID: 20650876]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nm1538] [PMID: 17237793]
[PMID: 25438096]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.27584] [PMID: 20872595]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rdc.2012.04.004] [PMID: 22819087]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01623462] [PMID: 9102065]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2015.06.013] [PMID: 26277847]
[PMID: 20819596]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar67] [PMID: 11094416]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204573] [PMID: 24161836]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2008-03-145169] [PMID: 18687985]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2016.03.029] [PMID: 27209224]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5582/ddt.2019.01011] [PMID: 30880318]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2014.10.015] [PMID: 25557658]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-257] [PMID: 21062498]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-289] [PMID: 25182527]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00223-009-9225-y] [PMID: 19252761]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04222.x] [PMID: 21284802]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11914-014-0197-0] [PMID: 24488619]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.62.11.1033] [PMID: 14583563]
[PMID: 9263141]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03009740801998747] [PMID: 18612924]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3769-2] [PMID: 27796445]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.27510] [PMID: 20506234]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2003.016253] [PMID: 15547081]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014361] [PMID: 30732168]