Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Current Pharmaceutical Design

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1381-6128
ISSN (Online): 1873-4286

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
General Research Article

Recognition of Invasive Prostate Cancer Using a GHRL Polypeptide Probe Targeting GHSR in a Mouse Model In Vivo

Author(s): Huamao Ye, Yue Yang, Rui Chen, Xiaolei Shi, Yu Fang, Jun Yang, Yuanzhen Dong, Lili Chen, Jianghua Xia, Chao Wang, Chenghua Yang, Jun Feng, Yang Wang*, Xiang Feng* and Chen Lü*

Volume 26, Issue 14, 2020

Page: [1614 - 1621] Pages: 8

DOI: 10.2174/1381612826666191227160001

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: Ghrelin (GHRL) is a polypeptide that can specifically bind to the growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHSR). The expression of GHSR is significantly different in normal and prostate cancer (PC) tissues in humans. It is important to find an effective diagnostic method for the diagnosis and prognosis of invasive PC/neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC).

Methods: GHRL and GHSR mRNA levels were determined by a quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction in PC tissues. The expression of GHRL and GHSR proteins was assessed by Western blot assay and immunohistochemistry. A GHRL polypeptide probe was synthesized by standard solid-phase polypeptide synthesis, and labeled with Alexa Fluor 660. Confocal microscopy was used to capture fluorescence images. Living imaging analysis showed tumor areas of different invasiveness in mice models.

Results: The levels of GHRL and GHSR copy number amplification and mRNA expression were increased in invasive PC/NEPC, and the protein expression levels of GHRL and GHSR were similarly increased in NEPC. The GHRL polypeptide probe could effectively bind to GHSR. In PC3 cells, it was found that the GHRL probe specifically binds to GHSR on the cell membrane and accumulates in the cells through internalization after binding. Live imaging in mice models showed that there were different signal intensities in tumor areas with different invasiveness.

Conclusion: GHSR and GHRL might be used in molecular imaging diagnosis for invasive PC/NEPC in the future.

Keywords: Prostate cancer, invasive/neuroendocrine prostate cancer, GHRL, GHSR, polypeptide probe, invasiveness.

« Previous Next »
[1]
Pezaro C, Woo HH, Davis ID. Prostate cancer: measuring PSA. Intern Med J 2014; 44(5): 433-40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imj.12407] [PMID: 24816306]
[2]
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin 2019; 69(1): 7-34.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.21551] [PMID: 30620402]
[3]
Yedjou CG, Mbemi AT, Noubissi F, et al. Prostate cancer disparity, chemoprevention, and treatment by specific medicinal plants. Nutrients 2019; 11(2): 11.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11020336] [PMID: 30720759]
[4]
Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 2016; 66(2): 115-32.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.21338] [PMID: 26808342]
[5]
Mei W, Lin X, Kapoor A, Gu Y, Zhao K, Tang D. The contributions of prostate cancer stem cells in prostate cancer initiation and metastasis. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11(4): 11.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11040434] [PMID: 30934773]
[6]
Kim S, Thaper D, Bidnur S, et al. PEG10 is associated with treatment-induced neuroendocrine prostate cancer. J Mol Endocrinol 2019; 63(1): 39-49.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/JME-18-0226] [PMID: 31013476]
[7]
Lack J, Gillard M, Cam M, Paner GP, VanderWeele DJ. Circulating tumor cells capture disease evolution in advanced prostate cancer. J Transl Med 2017; 15(1): 44.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-017-1138-3] [PMID: 28228136]
[8]
Sungur M, Caliskan S. Awareness of prostate cancer diagnosis and management among Turkish males: a cross sectional study from Çorum. Aging Male 2019; 1-4. Epub ahead of print
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13685538.2019.1577377] [PMID: 31007118]
[9]
Grossman DC, Curry SJ, Owens DK, et al. US preventive services task force. Screening for prostate cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA 2018; 319(18): 1901-13.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.3710] [PMID: 29801017]
[10]
Pu F, Xue S, Qiao J, Patel A, Yang JJ. Towards the Molecular imaging of prostate cancer biomarkers using protein-based MRI contrast agents. Curr Protein Pept Sci 2016; 17(6): 519-33.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1389203717666160101123725] [PMID: 26721404]
[11]
Tritschler S, Erdelkamp R, Stief C, Hentrich M. [Neuroendocrine prostate cancer]. Urologe A 2017; 56(11): 1475-84.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00120-017-0523-0] [PMID: 29063171]
[12]
Sheikhbahaei S, Afshar-Oromieh A, Eiber M, et al. Pearls and pitfalls in clinical interpretation of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017; 44(12): 2117-36.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-017-3780-7] [PMID: 28765998]
[13]
Tosoian JJ, Gorin MA, Rowe SP, et al. Correlation of PSMA-Targeted 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT findings with immunohistochemical and genomic data in a patient with metastatic neuroendocrine prostate cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2017; 15(1): e65-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2016.09.002] [PMID: 27751686]
[14]
Chakraborty PS, Tripathi M, Agarwal KK, Kumar R, Vijay MK, Bal C. Metastatic poorly differentiated prostatic carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation: negative on 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med 2015; 40(2): e163-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000000594] [PMID: 25275415]
[15]
Usmani S, Ahmed N, Marafi F, Rasheed R, Amanguno HG, Al Kandari F. Molecular imaging in neuroendocrine differentiation of prostate cancer: 68Ga-PSMA Versus 68Ga-DOTA NOC PET-CT. Clin Nucl Med 2017; 42(5): 410-3.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000001618] [PMID: 28240661]
[16]
Murashita K, Kurokawa T, Nilsen TO, Rønnestad I. Ghrelin, cholecystokinin, and peptide YY in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): molecular cloning and tissue expression. Gen Comp Endocrinol 2009; 160(3): 223-35.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2008.11.024] [PMID: 19073185]
[17]
Coppedè F, Stoccoro A, Lazzarotti A, Spisni R, Migliore L. Investigation of GHSR and GHRL methylation in colorectal cancer. Epigenomics 2018; 10(12): 1525-39.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/epi-2018-0030] [PMID: 29963901]
[18]
Charron CL, McFarland MS, Dhanvantari S, Luyt LG. Development of a [68Ga]-ghrelin analogue for PET imaging of the ghrelin receptor (GHS-R1a). MedChemComm 2018; 9(10): 1761-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C8MD00210J] [PMID: 30429981]
[19]
Opazo R, Plaza-Parrochia F, Cardoso Dos Santos GR, et al. Fasting Upregulates npy, agrp, and ghsr without increasing ghrelin levels in zebrafish (Danio rerio) larvae. Front Physiol 2019; 9: 1901.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.01901] [PMID: 30733682]
[20]
Lin TC, Hsiao M. Ghrelin and cancer progression. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 2017; 1868(1): 51-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbcan.2017.02.002] [PMID: 28238732]
[21]
Lanfranco F, Baldi M, Cassoni P, Bosco M, Ghé C, Muccioli G. Ghrelin and prostate cancer. Vitam Horm 2008; 77: 301-24.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0083-6729(06)77013-3] [PMID: 17983862]
[22]
Li Z, Chen CJ, Wang JK, et al. Neuroendocrine differentiation of prostate cancer. Asian J Androl 2013; 15(3): 328-32.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/aja.2013.7] [PMID: 23503426]
[23]
Lu C, McFarland MS, Nesbitt RL, et al. Ghrelin receptor as a novel imaging target for prostatic neoplasms. Prostate 2012; 72(8): 825-33.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pros.21484] [PMID: 21919027]
[24]
Chun K, Wenger GD, Chaubey A, et al. Assessing copy number aberrations and copy-neutral loss-of-heterozygosity across the genome as best practice: An evidence-based review from the Cancer Genomics Consortium (CGC) working group for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer Genet 2018; 228-229: 236-50.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cancergen.2018.07.004] [PMID: 30554732]
[25]
El-Magd MA, Saleh AA, Abdel-Hamid TM, Saleh RM, Afifi MA. Is really endogenous ghrelin a hunger signal in chickens? Association of GHSR SNPs with increase appetite, growth traits, expression and serum level of GHRL, and GH. Gen Comp Endocrinol 2016; 237: 131-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2016.08.016] [PMID: 27591070]
[26]
Chen CY, Tsai CY. Ghrelin and motilin in the gastrointestinal system. Curr Pharm Des 2012; 18(31): 4755-65.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/138161212803216915] [PMID: 22632857]
[27]
Rak-Mardyla A. Ghrelin role in hypothalamus-pituitary-ovarian axis. J Physiol Pharmacol 2013; 64(6): 695-704.
[PMID: 24388883]
[28]
Wang L, Chen Q, Li G, Ke D. Ghrelin ameliorates impaired angiogenesis of ischemic myocardium through GHSR1a-mediated AMPK/eNOS signal pathway in diabetic rats. Peptides 2015; 73: 77-87.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2015.09.004] [PMID: 26364514]
[29]
Crotta K, Casnici C, Tonna N, Lattuada D, Bianco F, Marelli O. Characterization of a monoclonal antibody specific for the growth hormone secretagogue receptor. Monoclon Antib Immunodiagn Immunother 2017; 36(2): 37-43.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/mab.2016.0053] [PMID: 28409695]
[30]
Fung JN, Seim I, Wang D, Obermair A, Chopin LK, Chen C. Expression and in vitro functions of the ghrelin axis in endometrial cancer. Horm Cancer 2010; 1(5): 245-55.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12672-010-0047-1] [PMID: 21761369]
[31]
Hormaechea-Agulla D, Gahete MD, Jiménez-Vacas JM, et al. The oncogenic role of the In1-ghrelin splicing variant in prostate cancer aggressiveness. Mol Cancer 2017; 16(1): 146.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12943-017-0713-9] [PMID: 28851363]
[32]
Yin H, Yang J, Zhang Q, et al. iRGD as a tumor‑penetrating peptide for cancer therapy (Review). Mol Med Rep 2017; 15(5): 2925-30.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2017.6419] [PMID: 28358432]
[33]
Jaradat DMM. Thirteen decades of peptide synthesis: key developments in solid phase peptide synthesis and amide bond formation utilized in peptide ligation. Amino Acids 2018; 50(1): 39-68.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00726-017-2516-0] [PMID: 29185032]
[34]
Sun X, Li Y, Liu T, Li Z, Zhang X, Chen X. Peptide-based imaging agents for cancer detection. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2017; 110-111: 38-51.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2016.06.007] [PMID: 27327937]
[35]
Song W, Wang Y, Liang RP, Zhang L, Qiu JD. Label-free fluorescence assay for protein kinase based on peptide biomineralized gold nanoclusters as signal sensing probe. Biosens Bioelectron 2015; 64: 234-40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2014.08.082] [PMID: 25222326]
[36]
Jeffery PL, Herington AC, Chopin LK. The potential autocrine/paracrine roles of ghrelin and its receptor in hormone-dependent cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2003; 14(2): 113-22.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6101(02)00089-8] [PMID: 12651223]
[37]
Cassoni P, Ghé C, Marrocco T, et al. Expression of ghrelin and biological activity of specific receptors for ghrelin and des-acyl ghrelin in human prostate neoplasms and related cell lines. Eur J Endocrinol 2004; 150(2): 173-84.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/eje.0.1500173] [PMID: 14763915]
[38]
Díaz-Lezama N, Hernández-Elvira M, Sandoval A, Monroy A, Felix R, Monjaraz E. Ghrelin inhibits proliferation and increases T-type Ca2+ channel expression in PC-3 human prostate carcinoma cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2010; 403(1): 24-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.10.100] [PMID: 21040709]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
Article Metrics
13
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy