Abstract
Background: Forkhead box C1 (FOXC1) is an important cancer-associated gene in tumor. PPAR-γ and C/EBPα are both transcriptional regulators involved in tumor development.
Objective: We aimed to clarify the function of PPAR-γ, C/EBPα in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and the relationship of PPAR-γ, C/EBPα and FOXC1 in HCC.
Methods: Western blotting, immunofluorescent staining, and immunohistochemistry were used to evaluate protein expression. qRT-PCR was used to assess mRNA expression. Co-IP was performed to detect the protein interaction. And ChIP and fluorescent reporter detection were used to determine the binding between protein and FOXC1 promoter.
Results: C/EBPα could bind to FOXC1 promoter and PPAR-γ could strengthen C/EBPα’s function. Expressions of C/EBPα and PPAR-γ were both negatively related to FOXC1 in human HCC tissue. Confocal displayed that C/EBPα was co-located with FOXC1 in HepG2 cells. C/EBPα could bind to FOXC1 promoter by ChIP. Luciferase activity detection exhibited that C/EBPα could inhibit FOXC1 promoter activity, especially FOXC1 promoter from -600 to -300 was the critical binding site. Only PPAR-γ could not influence luciferase activity but strengthen inhibited effect of C/EBPα. Further, the Co-IP displayed that PPAR-γ could bind to C/EBPα. When C/EBPα and PPAR-γ were both high expressed, cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and colony information were inhibited enormously. C/EBPα plasmid combined with or without PPAR-γ agonist MDG548 treatment exhibited a strong tumor inhibition and FOXC1 suppression in mice.
Conclusion: Our data establish C/EBPα targeting FOXC1 as a potential determinant in the HCC, which supplies a new pathway to treat HCC. However, PPAR-γ has no effect on FOXC1 expression.
Keywords: HCC, FOXC1, PPAR-γ, C/EBPα, proliferation, hepatocellular carcinoma.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.20107] [PMID: 21296855]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep.27198] [PMID: 24798001]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrc2223] [PMID: 17943136]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1109540109] [PMID: 22171010]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.03.035] [PMID: 16678147]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805206105] [PMID: 18780791]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13277-012-0617-7] [PMID: 23242609]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-4120] [PMID: 20406990]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1004900107] [PMID: 20713713]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.375865] [PMID: 22645147]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052299] [PMID: 23284978]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.441] [PMID: 19152448]
[PMID: 17786343]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2015.01.004] [PMID: 25592041]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms17081226] [PMID: 27483249]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.130] [PMID: 22472882]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep.23550] [PMID: 20512989]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.12143] [PMID: 23461356]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12032-017-1040-0] [PMID: 29098441]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066947] [PMID: 23826177]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-152] [PMID: 21410980]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.9812] [PMID: 19075268]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep.27593] [PMID: 25363290]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/85820] [PMID: 11242107]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2007-02-073486] [PMID: 17671232]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep.29677] [PMID: 29159818]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01916-16] [PMID: 28031362]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2015.06.023] [PMID: 26193663]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2008.08.003] [PMID: 18778769]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2004.09.011] [PMID: 15508102]
[PMID: 27508177]
[PMID: 12680236]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b00601] [PMID: 26720420]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep.23875] [PMID: 21038412]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41419-018-0262-1] [PMID: 29445189]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep.20994] [PMID: 16374840]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/2211536604666150320234654] [PMID: 25809640]