Abstract
Background: For decades, a great deal of research work has been done to synthesize ellipticine and its derivatives because of their potential antitumor properties and anti-HIV activities. However, the resonance structures in different media, a low level of solubility at physiological pH and systemic toxicity have prevented the use of ellipticine as a therapeutic agent. Besides, the low yield and complex steps of ellipticine synthesis limit its application.
Methods: A high-yield synthetic procedure of ellipticine has been optimized, and the total yield was up to 50% without silica gel column chromatography. Novel hexacyclic ellipticine derivatives were synthesized by coupling ellipticine with o-aminobenzoic acid. Their cytotoxicities against HCT116, MGC803, HT29 and MCF-7 tumor cells were evaluated. Results: The synthesis process of ellipticine was optimized, and the total yield of the synthetic route was increased to 50% through several operation steps optimization. Fourteen ellipticine hexacyclic derivatives were synthesized. The synthetic compounds were screened for anti-tumor activity in vivo and in vitro, and some of the derivatives had good anti-tumor activity. Conclusion: Compared with ellipticine, the compound 1l showed higher antitumor activity and better tolerance to tumor models. The compound 1l treatment increased the percentage of late apoptotic cells from 3.1% (DMSO) to 21.6% (20.0 μM) in NCI-H460 cells. It also was observed the effect of 1l on G2 phase arrest was similar as that of ellipticine. The mechanism of action indicated compound 1l could be a topoisomerase IIα poison. These studies provided the basis for the pharmacodynamics and toxicology of ellipticine, and further clarifies the structureactivity relationship of antitumor activity of ellipticine.Keywords: Ellipticine, hexacyclic derivatives, synthesis, antitumor activity, topoisomerase IIα inhibitor, xenograft model.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00726-016-2363-4] [PMID: 27864693]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00726-017-2433-2] [PMID: 28478584]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.09.153] [PMID: 30261256]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cplu.201600547]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2017.08.001]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/CH9672715]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr020059j] [PMID: 12428991]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr200447s] [PMID: 22480243]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-9598(08)60169-8]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4968046] [PMID: 27908111]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(87)90463-2] [PMID: 3318697]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp062778y] [PMID: 17020255]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2011.07.014] [PMID: 21843585]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2016.02.034] [PMID: 26906637]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2011.06.003] [PMID: 21683692]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.04.140] [PMID: 25960297]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5RA23437A]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2ob27186a] [PMID: 23314103]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00706-016-1684-z]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jm9602930] [PMID: 8765520]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp206232b] [PMID: 21812494]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jm00402a007] [PMID: 3385725]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-0917] [PMID: 21118972]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10637-014-0140-3] [PMID: 25107543]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10637-015-0302-y] [PMID: 26559431]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C6CC07365D] [PMID: 27735960]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.11.013] [PMID: 27871039]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1568011033482378] [PMID: 12769773]