Abstract
Background: The exact morbidity of myocarditis is unknown, as the treatment is generally delayed in virtue of misdiagnosis or missed diagnosis.
Aim: The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors of left-ventricular remodeling on CMRI performed in patients with pathological proven myocarditis.
Methods: Sixty-two cases with various presentations of myocarditis (39 cases with heart failure; 23 cases with arrhythmias) were selected. All patients, who underwent coronary angiography, endomyocardial biopsy, were divided into positive-remodeling and negative-remodelling groups to analyse LGE and cardiac cine parameters at presentation and subsequent to 3 months.
Results: Comparison of two subgroups in CMRI is as follows: positive LGE (65.6% vs. 86.7%; p<0.05), LVEF (41.3±14.8% vs. 37.6±10.1%; p=0.62), (25.7±2.0% vs. 24.0±2.5%; p=0.81), (44.5±3.9mm vs. 46.3±5.4mm; p=0.76), (129.1±8.5ml vs. 135.3±12.2ml; p=0.26), (74.8±7.3ml vs. 79.1±10.0ml; p=0.55), (52.0±5.7g vs. 49.6±6.5g; p=0.71), (34.9±3.5ml vs. 32.4±6.2ml; p=0.68), (3.8±0.7L/min vs. 3.1±0.5L/min; p=0.64), (2.9±0.6L/min*m2 vs. 2.7±0.5L/min*m2; p=0.79).
Conclusion: LGE-MRI is rewarding as an independent predictor in left-ventricular positive and negative remodelling of myocarditis.
Keywords: Myocarditis, remodelling, heart failure, arrhythmias, magnetic resonance imaging, angiography.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60648-X] [PMID: 22185868]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra0800028] [PMID: 19357408]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(92)90141-9] [PMID: 1607543]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2004.045518] [PMID: 15923280]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.105.584532] [PMID: 16476862]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200011093431908] [PMID: 11070105]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00648-X] [PMID: 12906974]
[PMID: 19712618]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/rg.291085052] [PMID: 19168838]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1067-x] [PMID: 18642002]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2005.08.021] [PMID: 16824834]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mje.2002.123374]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.007] [PMID: 19389557]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.020] [PMID: 16360043]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.174.6.1741737] [PMID: 10845515]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.589663] [PMID: 16449736]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-08-1151] [PMID: 19246813]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000072766.67150.51] [PMID: 12771005]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2311-7] [PMID: 15067425]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(99)00630-0] [PMID: 10716457]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.81.4.1161] [PMID: 2138525]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.96.10.3294] [PMID: 9396419]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.87.3.755] [PMID: 8443896]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2231010235] [PMID: 11930076]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehi258] [PMID: 15831557]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2261012108] [PMID: 12511682]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000118493.13323.81] [PMID: 14993139]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.105.606509] [PMID: 17015795]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.104.499202] [PMID: 16129812]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.11.059] [PMID: 17437737]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.12.074] [PMID: 20633819]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02602-5] [PMID: 12505229]