Generic placeholder image

Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 2211-7385
ISSN (Online): 2211-7393

Review Article

A Compendium of Bioavailability Enhancement via Niosome Technology

Author(s): Sumit Sharma*, Neha Kumari, Deepika Garg and Samrat Chauhan

Volume 11, Issue 4, 2023

Published on: 04 April, 2023

Page: [324 - 338] Pages: 15

DOI: 10.2174/2211738511666230309104323

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: Bioavailability is the dissimilarity between the total amount of drug exposure to a person and the actual dose received by his body. The difference in bioavailability between formulations of a given drug can have clinical implications.

Methods: Poor aqueous solubility, inappropriate partition coefficient, high first-pass metabolism, narrow absorption window, and acidic pH of the stomach are the main reasons behind the low bioavailability of drugs. There are three substantial methods to vanquish these bioavailability issues, namely pharmacokinetic, biological, and pharmaceutical approaches.

Results: In the pharmacokinetic approach a drug molecule is improved by making alterations in its chemical structure. In the biological approach, the course of administration of the drug is changed; for example, if a drug has very less oral bioavailability, it can be injected as parenteral or some other route if feasible. In the pharmaceutical approach to enhance bioavailability, the physiochemical properties of the drug or formulation are modified. It is cost-effective, less time-consuming, and the risk factor is also minimum. Co-solvency, particle size reduction, hydrotrophy, solid dispersion, micellar solubilisation, complexation, and colloidal drug delivery systems are some of the commonly used methods to enhance the dissolution profiles of drugs via the pharmaceutical approach. Similar to liposomes, niosomes are also vesicular carrier systems but non-ionic surfactants are used instead of phospholipids in their formulation, i.e., their bilayer is comprised of non-ionic surfactants that encircle the aqueous compartment. The niosomes are presumed to raise the bioavailability of poorly water-soluble drugs by increasing their uptake by the M cells present in Peyer's patches of lymphatic tissues of the intestine.

Conclusion: Niosomal technology has become an attractive method to overcome several limitations due to its various merits like biodegradability, high stability, non-immunogenic nature, low cost, and flexibility to incorporate lipophilic as well as hydrophilic drugs. The bioavailability of many BCS class II and IV drugs has been successfully enhanced using niosomal technology, like Griseofulvin, Paclitaxel, Candesartan Cilexetil, Carvedilol, Clarithromycin, Telmisartan, and Glimepiride. Niosomal technology has also been exploited for brain targeting via nasal delivery for many drugs like Nefopam, Pentamidine, Ondansetron HCl, and Bromocriptine mesylate. Based on this data, it can be concluded that niosomal technology has increased importance in bioavailability enhancement and improving the overall performance of molecules in vitro and in vivo. Thus, niosomal technology holds tremendous potential for scale-up applications, overcoming the drawbacks of conventional dosage forms.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
Shargel L, Yu AB. Applied Biopharmaceutics & Pharmacokinetics. (4th ed.), 1999.
[2]
Kanikkannan N. Technologies to improve the solubility, dissolution and bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs. J Anal Pharm Res 2018; 7(1): 44-50.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.15406/japlr.2018.07.00198]
[3]
Kalepu S, Nekkanti V. Insoluble drug delivery strategies: Review of recent advances and business prospects. Acta Pharm Sin B 2015; 5(5): 442-53.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2015.07.003] [PMID: 26579474]
[4]
Savjani KT, Gajjar AK, Savjani JK. Drug solubility: Importance and enhancement techniques. ISRN Pharm 2012; 2012: 1-10.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/195727] [PMID: 22830056]
[5]
Thummel K, Kunze KL, Thummel KE. Enzyme-catalyzed processes of first-pass hepatic and intestinal drug extraction. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 1997; 27(2-3): 99-127.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(97)00039-2] [PMID: 10837554]
[6]
Hassanzadeh A, Barber J, Morris GA, Gorry PA. Mechanism for the degradation of erythromycin A and erythromycin A 2′-ethyl succinate in acidic aqueous solution. J Phys Chem A 2007; 111(40): 10098-104.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp073030y] [PMID: 17880049]
[7]
Gogate MS. Erythromycin monograph, in chemical stability of Pharmaceuticals: A handbook for Pharmacists. (2nd ed.). 1986; pp. 457-63.
[8]
Strickley RG. Solubilizing excipients in oral and injectable formulations. Pharm Res 2004; 21(2): 201-30.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:PHAM.0000016235.32639.23] [PMID: 15032302]
[9]
Sud S, Kamath A. Methods of size reduction and factors affecting size reduction in pharmaceutics. Int Res J Pharm 2013; 4(8): 57-64.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7897/2230-8407.04810]
[10]
Kumar A, Sahoo SK, Kumud P, Prithi SK, Ajit S, Naveen P. Review on solubility enhancement techniques for hydrophobic drugs. Pharm Glob 2011; 3(3): 1-7.
[11]
Reddy Y, Sravani A, Ravisankar A. Transferosomes A novel vesicular carrier for transdermal drug delivery system. J Innov Pharm Biol Sci 2015; 2(2): 193-208.
[12]
Fahr A, Liu X. Drug delivery strategies for poorly water-soluble drugs. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2007; 4(4): 403-16.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1517/17425247.4.4.403] [PMID: 17683253]
[13]
Mohammed AR, Weston N, Coombes AGA, Fitzgerald M, Perrie Y. Liposome formulation of poorly water soluble drugs: Optimisation of drug loading and ESEM analysis of stability. Int J Pharm 2004; 285(1-2): 23-34.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2004.07.010] [PMID: 15488676]
[14]
Rooijen NV. Encyclopedia of Immunology. (2nd ed.), 1998.
[15]
Taira MC, Chiaramoni NS, Pecuch KM, Alonso-Romanowski S. Stability of liposomal formulations in physiological conditions for oral drug delivery. Drug Deliv 2004; 11(2): 123-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10717540490280769] [PMID: 15200011]
[16]
Mohanty D, Mounika A, Bakshi V, Akiful Haque M, Keshari Sahoo C. Ethosomes: A novel approach for transdermal delivery. Int J Chemtech Res 2018; 11(8): 219-26.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.20902/IJCTR.2018.110826]
[17]
Potočki S. Potential health benefits of sphingolipids in milk and dairy products. Mljekarstvo 66(4): 251-61.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.15567/mljekarstvo.2016.0401]
[18]
Swarnlata S, Deepanker G, Chanchal DK, Shailendra S. Sphingosomes a novel approach to vesicular drug delivery. Int J Curr Sci Res 2011; 1(2): 63-8.
[19]
Priyanka K, Singh S. A review on skin targeted delivery of bioactives as ultradeformable vesicles: Overcoming the penetration problem. Curr Drug Targets 2014; 15(2): 184-98.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1389450115666140113100338] [PMID: 24410447]
[20]
Gupta AK, Gupta D, Gupta V. Aquasomes: A self-assembled nano-particulate carrier system. Int J Curr Res Rev 2021; 13(4): 44-52.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.31782/IJCRR.2021.13427]
[21]
Swarnlata S, Rahul R, Chanchal DK, Shailendra S. Colloidosomes an advanced vesicular system in drug delivery. Asian J Sci Res 2011; 4: 1-15.
[22]
Katec LT, Mark W, Steven PA. Colloidosomes: Synthesis, properties and applications. J Colloid Interface Sci 2015; 447: 217-28.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2014.11.058]
[23]
Cosco D, Paolino D, Muzzalupo R, et al. Innovative bola-surfactant niosomes as topical delivery systems of 5-fluorouracil for the treatment of skin cancer. Biomed Microdevices 2009; 11: 1115-25.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10544-009-9328-2] [PMID: 19507033]
[24]
Rentel CO, Bouwstra JA, Naisbett B, Junginger HE. Niosomes as a novel peroral vaccine delivery system. Int J Pharm 1999; 186(2): 161-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5173(99)00167-2] [PMID: 10486434]
[25]
Varshosaz J, Taymouri S. Effect of different types of surfactants on the physical properties and stability of carvedilol nano-niosomes. Adv Biomed Res 2016; 5(1): 48.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.178781] [PMID: 27110545]
[26]
Kumar GP, Rajeshwarrao P. Nonionic surfactant vesicular systems for effective drug delivery-an overview. Acta Pharm Sin B 2011; 1(4): 208-19.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2011.09.002]
[27]
Ge X, Wei M, He S, Yuan WE. Advances of non-ionic surfactant vesicles (Niosomes) and their application in drug delivery. Pharmaceutics 2019; 11(2): 55.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics11020055] [PMID: 30700021]
[28]
Jiao J. Polyoxyethylated nonionic surfactants and their applications in topical ocular drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2008; 60(15): 1663-73.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2008.09.002] [PMID: 18845195]
[29]
Liu T, Guo R, Hua W, Qiu J. Structure behaviors of hemoglobin in PEG 6000/Tween 80/Span 80/H2O niosome system. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 2007; 293(1-3): 255-61.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.07.053]
[30]
Aggarwal S, Bakshi V, Raghuram AP, Pandey S, Udupa N. Effect of cholesterol content and surfactant HLB on vesicle properties of niosomes. Indian J Pharm Sci 2004; 66(1): 121-3.
[31]
Junyaprasert VB, Teeranachaideekul V, Supaperm T. Effect of charged and non-ionic membrane additives on physicochemical properties and stability of niosomes. AAPS PharmSciTech 2008; 9(3): 851-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12249-008-9121-1] [PMID: 18636334]
[32]
Bayindir ZS, Yuksel N. Characterization of niosomes prepared with various nonionic surfactants for paclitaxel oral delivery. J Pharm Sci 2010; 99(4): 2049-60.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jps.21944] [PMID: 19780133]
[33]
Sharma P, Asthana G, Asthana A. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of niosomal formulation for controlled delivery of clarithromycin. Scientifica (Cairo) 2016; 2016: 1-10.
[34]
Aggarwal G, Chandel P, Harikumar SL, Bansal S. Design and development of cefdinir niosomes for oral delivery. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2013; 5(4): 318-25.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.120080] [PMID: 24302841]
[35]
Srinivas S, Hemanth A, Kumar A. Preparation and evaluation of niosomes containing Acelofenac. Dig J Nanomater Biostruct 2010; 5(1): 249-54.
[36]
Yasam VR, Jakki SL, Natarajan J, Kuppusamy G. A review on novel vesicular drug delivery. Proniosomes Drug Deliv 2014; 21(4): 243-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10717544.2013.841783] [PMID: 24128089]
[37]
Veldurthi R, Abbaraju K. Formulation and evaluation of Etoricoxib niosomes by thin film hydration technique and ether ejection method. Nano Biomed Eng 2017; 9(3): 242-8.
[38]
Moghassemi S, Hadjizadeh A. Nano-niosomes as nanoscale drug delivery systems: An illustrated review. J Control Release 2014; 185(1): 22-36.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.04.015] [PMID: 24747765]
[39]
Talsma H, Van Steenbergen MJ, Borchert JCH, Crommelin DJA. A novel technique for the one-step preparation of liposomes and nonionic surfactant vesicles without the use of organic solvents. Liposome formation in a continuous gas stream: the ‘bubble’ method. J Pharm Sci 1994; 83(3): 276-80.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600830303] [PMID: 8207668]
[40]
Mayer LD, Bally MB, Cullis PR. Uptake of adriamycin into large unilamellar vesicles in response to a pH gradient. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr 1986; 857(1): 123-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0005-2736(86)90105-7] [PMID: 3964703]
[41]
Attia IA, El-Gizawy SA, Fouda MA, Donia AM. Influence of a niosomal formulation on the oral bioavailability of acyclovir in rabbits. AAPS PharmSciTech 2007; 8(4): 206-12.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/pt0804106] [PMID: 18181527]
[42]
Jadon PS, Gajbhiye V, Jadon RS, Gajbhiye KR, Ganesh N. Enhanced oral bioavailability of griseofulvin vianiosomes. AAPS PharmSciTech 2009; 10(4): 1186-92.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12249-009-9325-z] [PMID: 19856107]
[43]
Kamboj S, Saini V, Bala S. Formulation and characterization of drug loaded nonionic surfactant vesicles (niosomes) for oral bioavailability enhancement. ScientificWorldJournal 2014; 2014: 1-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/959741] [PMID: 24672401]
[44]
Sezgin-Bayindir Z, Onay-Besikci A, Vural N, Yuksel N. Niosomes encapsulating paclitaxel for oral bioavailability enhancement: Preparation, characterization, pharmacokinetics and biodistribution. J Microencapsul 2013; 30(8): 796-804.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02652048.2013.788088] [PMID: 23631385]
[45]
Sezgin-Bayindir Z, Antep MN, Yuksel N. Development and characterization of mixed niosomes for oral delivery using candesartan cilexetil as a model poorly water-soluble drug. AAPS PharmSciTech 2015; 16(1): 108-17.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12249-014-0213-9] [PMID: 25204859]
[46]
Arzani G, Haeri A, Daeihamed M, Bakhtiari-Kaboutaraki H, Dadashzadeh S. Niosomal carriers enhance oral bioavailability of carvedilol: Effects of bile salt-enriched vesicles and carrier surface charge. Int J Nanomedicine 2015; 10: 4797-813.
[PMID: 26251598]
[47]
Ullah S, Shah MR, Shoaib M, et al. Development of a biocompatible creatinine-based niosomal delivery system for enhanced oral bioavailability of clarithromycin. Drug Deliv 2016; 23(9): 3480-91.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10717544.2016.1196768] [PMID: 27247018]
[48]
Ahad A, Raish M, Al-Jenoobi FI, Al-Mohizea AM. Sorbitane monostearate and cholesterol based niosomes for oral delivery of telmisartan. Curr Drug Deliv 2018; 15(2): 260-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1567201814666170518131934] [PMID: 28521674]
[49]
Chauhan MK, Bhatt N. Bioavailability enhancement of polymyxin b with novel drug delivery: Development and optimization using quality-by-design approach. J Pharm Sci 2019; 108(4): 1521-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2018.11.032] [PMID: 30472265]
[50]
Mohsen AM, AbouSamra MM, ElShebiney SA. Enhanced oral bioavailability and sustained delivery of glimepiride via niosomal encapsulation: in vitro characterization and in vivo evaluation. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2017; 43(8): 1254-64.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03639045.2017.1310224] [PMID: 28330377]
[51]
Okore VC, Attama AA, Ofokansi KC, Esimone CO, Onuigbo EB. Formulation and evaluation of niosomes. Indian J Pharm Sci 2011; 73(3): 323-8.
[PMID: 22457561]
[52]
Ravouru N, Kondreddy P, Korakanchi DMH. Formulation and evaluation of niosomal nasal drug delivery system of folic acid for brain targeting. Curr Drug Discov Technol 2013; 10(4): 270-82.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/15701638113109990031] [PMID: 23863098]
[53]
Ammar HO, Haider M, Ibrahim M, El Hoffy NM. in vitro and in vivo investigation for optimization of niosomal ability for sustainment and bioavailability enhancement of diltiazem after nasal administration. Drug Deliv 2017; 24(1): 414-21.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10717544.2016.1259371] [PMID: 28165822]
[54]
Priprem A, Johns JR, Limsitthichaikoon S, Limphirat W, Mahakunakorn P, Johns NP. Intranasal melatonin nanoniosomes: Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamics and toxicity studies. Ther Deliv 2017; 8(6): 373-90.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4155/tde-2017-0005] [PMID: 28530143]
[55]
Abou-Taleb HA, Khallaf RA, Abdel-Aleem JA. Intranasal niosomes of nefopam with improved bioavailability: Preparation, optimization, and in vivo evaluation. Drug Des Devel Ther 2018; 12: 3501-16.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S177746] [PMID: 30410310]
[56]
Rinaldi F, Hanieh P, Chan L, et al. Chitosan glutamate-coated niosomes: A proposal for nose to brain delivery. Pharmaceutics 2018; 10(2): 38.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics10020038] [PMID: 29565809]
[57]
Teaima MH, El Mohamady AM, El-Nabarawi MA, Mohamed AI. Formulation and evaluation of niosomal vesicles containing ondansetron HCL for trans-mucosal nasal drug delivery. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2020; 46(5): 751-61.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03639045.2020.1753061] [PMID: 32250181]
[58]
Sita VG, Jadhav D, Vavia P. Niosomes for nose-to-brain delivery of bromocriptine: Formulation development, efficacy evaluation and toxicity profiling. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 2020; 58: 101791.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2020.101791]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy