Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Current Medical Imaging

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4056
ISSN (Online): 1875-6603

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Research Article

Is the Prevalence of Estimated Pelvic Congestion Higher than Examined? A Retrospective Study of Consecutive Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography Analyses

Author(s): Hüseyin Akdeniz*

Volume 18, Issue 1, 2022

Published on: 13 December, 2021

Article ID: e260821195845 Pages: 6

DOI: 10.2174/1573405617666210826123101

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: Chronic Pelvic Pain (CPP) is a common complaint in women, and is the key factor in the diagnosis of Pelvic Congestion Syndrome (PCS).

Introduction: Consecutive abdominal and pelvic Computed Tomography (CT) scans in adult female patients not diagnosed with PCS and collected over a period of 3 years were evaluated retrospectively to determine the prevalence of underestimated Pelvic Congestion (PC).

Methods: 500 consecutive abdominal and pelvic CT scans collected from female patients aged 18-80 years were retrospectively analyzed for the presence of PC.

Results: 90 of the CT scans examined showed the presence of PC (18%). These patients were divided into two groups: Group I had 52 scans with unilateral PC, while Group II had 38 scans with the bilateral enlarged Ovarian Vein (OV). Left and right OV diameters were measured as 7.14±2.15 and 5.56±1.87 mm, respectively. Co-occurrence of additional vascular anomalies, such as nutcracker- type compression of the left renal vein, and May Thurner, was significantly higher in Group I than Group II (p<0.001). The diameter of the OV remained wide irrespective of age in Group I, but showed a decrease with increasing age in Group II. The most common complaint was abdominal pain; these patients required an average of six referrals to two different clinics (primarily general surgery and internal medicine) before being diagnosed with PC.

Conclusion: The diagnosis of PCS remains to be an important problem for patients because of insufficient perception of physicians. PCS should be considered in female patients with complaints of chronic abdominal and pelvic pain and CT may be a valuable examination tool for diagnosis.

Keywords: Computed tomography, venous congestion, ovarian vein, reflux, female, abdominal pain, pelvic pain.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
O’Brien MT, Gillespie DL. Diagnosis and treatment of the pelvic congestion syndrome. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2015; 3(1): 96-106.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2014.05.007] [PMID: 26993690]
[2]
Gutvirtz GIL, Imterat M, Weintraub ADIY. Pelvic congestion syndrome: A current review. Pelviperineology 2018; 37: 14-6.
[3]
Robinson JC. Chronic pelvic pain. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1993; 5(6): 740-3.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001703-199312000-00005] [PMID: 8286684]
[4]
Knuttinen MG, Xie K, Jani A, Palumbo A, Carrillo T, Mar W. Pelvic venous insufficiency: Imaging diagnosis, treatment approaches, and therapeutic issues. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015; 204(2): 448-58.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.14.12709] [PMID: 25615769]
[5]
Durham JD, Machan L. Pelvic congestion syndrome. Semin Intervent Radiol 2013; 30(4): 372-80.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1359731] [PMID: 24436564]
[6]
Ahangari A. Prevalence of chronic pelvic pain among women: An updated review. Pain Physician 2014; 17(2): E141-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.36076/ppj.2014/17/E141] [PMID: 24658485]
[7]
Latthe P, Latthe M, Say L, Gülmezoglu M, Khan KS. WHO systematic review of prevalence of chronic pelvic pain: A neglected reproductive health morbidity. BMC Public Health 2006; 6: 177.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-177] [PMID: 16824213]
[8]
Jung SC, Lee W, Chung JW, et al. Unusual causes of varicose veins in the lower extremities: CT venographic and Doppler US findings. Radiographics 2009; 29(2): 525-36.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/rg.292085154] [PMID: 19325063]
[9]
Scultetus AH, Villavicencio JL, Gillespie DL, Kao TC, Rich NM. The pelvic venous syndromes: Analysis of our experience with 57 patients. J Vasc Surg 2002; 36(5): 881-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mva.2002.129114] [PMID: 12422096]
[10]
Arbid E, Antezana J. Pelvic venous reflux diseases. J Fam Med 2020; 7(1): 1-6.
[11]
Desimpelaere JH, Seynaeve PC, Hagers YM, Appel BJ, Mortelmans LL. Pelvic congestion syndrome: Demonstration and diagnosis by helical CT. Abdom Imaging 1999; 24(1): 100-2.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002619900451] [PMID: 9933685]
[12]
Szaflarski D, Sosner E, French TD, et al. Evaluating the frequency and severity of ovarian venous congestion on adult computed tomography. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2019; 44(1): 259-63.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1707-9] [PMID: 30054683]
[13]
Rozenblit AM, Ricci ZJ, Tuvia J, Amis ESJ Jr. Incompetent and dilated ovarian veins: A common CT finding in asymptomatic parous women. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176(1): 119-22.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.176.1.1760119] [PMID: 11133549]
[14]
Ahlberg NE, Bartley O, Chidekel N. Right and left gonadal veins. An anatomical and statistical study. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1966; 4(6): 593-601.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/028418516600400601] [PMID: 5929114]
[15]
Hiromura T, Nishioka T, Nishioka S, Ikeda H, Tomita K. Reflux in the left ovarian vein: Analysis of MDCT findings in asymptomatic women. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183(5): 1411-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.183.5.1831411] [PMID: 15505313]
[16]
Bookwalter CA, VanBuren WM, Neisen MJ, Bjarnason H. Imaging appearance and nonsurgical management of pelvic venous congestion syndrome. Radiographics 2019; 39(2): 596-608.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/rg.2019180159] [PMID: 30844351]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
Article Metrics
14
6
1
1
© 2025 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy