Abstract
This work deals with the use of predictors to identify useful B-cell linear epitopes to develop immunoassays. Experimental techniques to meet this goal are quite expensive and time consuming. Therefore, we tested 5 free, online prediction methods (AAPPred, ABCpred, BcePred, BepiPred and Antigenic) widely used for predicting linear epitopes, using the primary structure of the protein as the only input. We chose a set of 65 experimentally well documented epitopes obtained by the most reliable experimental techniques as our true positive set. To compare the quality of the predictor methods we used their positive predictive value (PPV), i.e. the proportion of the predicted epitopes that are true, experimentally confirmed epitopes, in relation to all the epitopes predicted. We conclude that AAPPred and ABCpred yield the best results as compared with the other programs and with a random prediction procedure. Our results also indicate that considering the consensual epitopes predicted by several programs does not improve the PPV.
Keywords: Diagnostic, epitope, immunochemical, linear B-cell epitopes, prediction, program, reagents.
Protein & Peptide Letters
Title:Evaluation and Comparison of the Ability of Online Available Prediction Programs to Predict True Linear B-cell Epitopes
Volume: 20 Issue: 6
Author(s): Juan G. Costa, Pablo L. Faccendini, Silvano J. Sferco, Claudia M. Lagier and Ivan S. Marcipar
Affiliation:
Keywords: Diagnostic, epitope, immunochemical, linear B-cell epitopes, prediction, program, reagents.
Abstract: This work deals with the use of predictors to identify useful B-cell linear epitopes to develop immunoassays. Experimental techniques to meet this goal are quite expensive and time consuming. Therefore, we tested 5 free, online prediction methods (AAPPred, ABCpred, BcePred, BepiPred and Antigenic) widely used for predicting linear epitopes, using the primary structure of the protein as the only input. We chose a set of 65 experimentally well documented epitopes obtained by the most reliable experimental techniques as our true positive set. To compare the quality of the predictor methods we used their positive predictive value (PPV), i.e. the proportion of the predicted epitopes that are true, experimentally confirmed epitopes, in relation to all the epitopes predicted. We conclude that AAPPred and ABCpred yield the best results as compared with the other programs and with a random prediction procedure. Our results also indicate that considering the consensual epitopes predicted by several programs does not improve the PPV.
Export Options
About this article
Cite this article as:
Costa Juan G., Faccendini Pablo L., Sferco Silvano J., Lagier Claudia M. and Marcipar Ivan S., Evaluation and Comparison of the Ability of Online Available Prediction Programs to Predict True Linear B-cell Epitopes, Protein & Peptide Letters 2013; 20 (6) . https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/0929866511320060011
DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/0929866511320060011 |
Print ISSN 0929-8665 |
Publisher Name Bentham Science Publisher |
Online ISSN 1875-5305 |
- Author Guidelines
- Graphical Abstracts
- Fabricating and Stating False Information
- Research Misconduct
- Post Publication Discussions and Corrections
- Publishing Ethics and Rectitude
- Increase Visibility of Your Article
- Archiving Policies
- Peer Review Workflow
- Order Your Article Before Print
- Promote Your Article
- Manuscript Transfer Facility
- Editorial Policies
- Allegations from Whistleblowers
Related Articles
-
Characterization of Proteins from Putative Human DNA and RNA
Viruses
Current Proteomics Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic: A Race Against Time
Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry Coronavirus (COVID-19) Outbreak: A Test of Viral Muscle Versus the Human Tussle
Applied Clinical Research, Clinical Trials and Regulatory Affairs Patents Related to Pathogenic Human Coronaviruses
Recent Patents on Biotechnology Postpartum Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome in a Patient Suspected to COVID-19
Anti-Infective Agents Molecular Characterization of SARS-CoV-2
Current Molecular Medicine The use of Pseudotyped Coronaviruses for the Screening of Entry Inhibitors: Green Tea Extract Inhibits the Entry of SARS-CoV-1, MERSCoV, and SARS-CoV-2 by Blocking Receptor-spike Interaction
Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology Facts and Myths: Efficacies of Repurposing Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine for the Treatment of COVID-19
Current Drug Targets Preliminary Identification of Hamamelitannin and Rosmarinic Acid as COVID-19 Inhibitors Based on Molecular Docking
Letters in Drug Design & Discovery High Content Pharmacophores from Molecular Fields: A Biologically Relevant Method for Comparing and Understanding Ligands
Current Computer-Aided Drug Design Design and Development of Smart and Safe Helmet for Inhibiting COVID-19 Virus Infection: A Simple Idea for Solving the Big Crisis
Coronaviruses In-silico Study to Identify Dietary Molecules as Potential SARS-CoV-2 Agents
Letters in Drug Design & Discovery COVID-19 Severity: Lung-Heart Interplay
Current Cardiology Reviews Drug Re-purposing Approach and Potential Therapeutic Strategies to Treat COVID-19
Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry Natural Substances and Semisynthetic Derivatives as Potential Alternative Products Against SARS-CoV-2
Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry Current Trends and Future Strategies for the Global Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic
Coronaviruses Perspectives for the Use of N-acetylcysteine as a Candidate Drug to Treat COVID-19
Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry COVID-19 in People with Diabetes: Epidemiological Perspectives and Public Health Actions in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region
Current Diabetes Reviews Synthesis of Novel Test Compounds for Antiviral Chemotherapy of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)
Current Medicinal Chemistry Counter-regulatory ‘Renin-Angiotensin’ System-based Candidate Drugs to Treat COVID-19 Diseases in SARS-CoV-2-infected Patients
Infectious Disorders - Drug Targets