Abstract
Introduction: The diagnosis and characterization of vertebral compression fractures are very important for clinical management. In this evaluation, which is usually performed with diagnostic (conventional) imaging, the findings are not always typical or diagnostic. Therefore, it is important to have new information to support imaging findings. Texture analysis is a method that can evaluate information contained in diagnostic images and is not visually noticeable. This study aimed to evaluate the magnetic resonance images of cases diagnosed with vertebral compression fractures by the texture analysis method, compare them with histopathological data, and investigate the effectiveness of this method in the differentiation of benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures.
Methods: Fifty-five patients with a total of 56 vertebral compression fractures were included in the study. Magnetic resonance images were examined and segmented using Local Image Feature Extraction (LIFEx) software, which is an open-source program for texture analysis. The results were compared with the histopathological diagnosis.
Results: The application of the Decision Tree algorithm to the dataset yielded impressively accurate predictions (≈95% in accuracy, precision, and recall).
Conclusion: Interpreting tissue analysis parameters together with conventional magnetic resonance imaging findings can improve the abilities of radiologists, lead to accurate diagnoses, and prevent unnecessary invasive procedures. Further prospective trials in larger populations are needed to verify the role and performance of texture analysis in patients with vertebral compression fractures.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5528] [PMID: 29348133]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/rg.231025043] [PMID: 12533652]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015151169] [PMID: 26579733]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.18.20624] [PMID: 30645163]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42492-019-0025-6]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-018-0068-z] [PMID: 30426318]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2011.11.036] [PMID: 22257792]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.581] [PMID: 23299535]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-02192-2] [PMID: 36585716]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2017.11.004] [PMID: 29199085]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06666-3] [PMID: 32060715]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.04.006] [PMID: 27111110]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110642] [PMID: 36527774]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.778537] [PMID: 35058878]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000000969] [PMID: 31939887]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0284185119830292] [PMID: 30799636]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2016.07.002]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-20-1385] [PMID: 34993108]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.10.023] [PMID: 23194641]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.08.014] [PMID: 27666629]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.2.4.041002] [PMID: 26251842]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.199935]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106594] [PMID: 36753979]