Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Current Medical Imaging

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4056
ISSN (Online): 1875-6603

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Research Article

Clinical Presentations, MDCT Features, and Treatment of Three Types of Adult Intussusceptions Based on the Location

Author(s): Qiu-jie Dong, Jing Shi, Chun-lai Zhang, Xiao-guang Li, Xiao Chen and Yi Wang*

Volume 20, 2024

Published on: 20 February, 2024

Article ID: e15734056295254 Pages: 13

DOI: 10.2174/0115734056295254240209102215

Price: $65

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to explore the similarities and differences in clinical presentations, multidetector computed tomographic (MDCT) features, and treatment of three types of adult intussusceptions based on location.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 184 adult patients with 192 intussusceptions. Depending on the location, intussusceptions were classified as enteric, ileocolic, and colonic types. The similarities and differences of clinical presentations, MDCT features, and treatment of three types of adult intussusception were compared. Meanwhile, the three types of intussusceptions were further divided into surgical and conservative groups based on the treatment. Uni- and multivariate logistic analyses were used to identify risk factors for intussusception requiring surgery.

Results: Enteric and ileocolic intussusceptions were mainly presented with abdominal pain (78.46% and 85.71%). Hematochezia/melena (64.29%) was the main symptom of colonic intussusception. On MDCT, ileocolic intussusceptions were longer in length and had more signs of intestinal necrosis (hypodense layer, fluid collection and no/poor bowel wall enhancement) than enteric and colonic intussusceptions. Moreover, it was found that 93.88% (46/49) of ileocolic intussusception and 98.59% (70/71) of colonic intussusception belonged to the surgical group, whereas only 43.06% (31/72) of enteric intussusception belonged to the surgical group. Intussusception length (OR=1.171, P=0.028) and discernible lead point on MDCT (OR=21.003, P<0.001) were reliable indicators of enteric intussusception requiring surgery.

Conclusion: Ileocolic intussusception may be more prone to intestinal necrosis than enteric and colonic intussusceptions, requiring more attention from clinicians. Surgery remains the treatment of choice for most ileocolic and colonic intussusceptions. Less than half of enteric intussusceptions require surgery, and MDCT features are effective in identifying them.

[1]
Su T, He L, Zhou T, et al. Most adult intussusceptions are caused by tumors: A single-centre analysis. Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12: 10011-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S268921] [PMID: 33116857]
[2]
Neymark M, Abramov R, Dronov M, Gilshtein H. Management of adult intussusception—a case series experience from a tertiary center. World J Surg 2021; 45(12): 3584-91.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-06277-z] [PMID: 34363099]
[3]
Hong KD, Kim J, Ji W, Wexner SD. Adult intussusception: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 2019; 23(4): 315-24.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-019-01980-5] [PMID: 31011846]
[4]
Panzera F, Di Venere B, Rizzi M, et al. Bowel intussusception in adult: Prevalence, diagnostic tools and therapy. World J Methodol 2021; 11(3): 81-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v11.i3.81] [PMID: 34026581]
[5]
Aydin N, Roth A, Misra S. Surgical versus conservative management of adult intussusception: Case series and review. Int J Surg Case Rep 2016; 20: 142-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.01.019] [PMID: 26859872]
[6]
Rea JD, Lockhart ME, Yarbrough DE, Leeth RR, Bledsoe SE, Clements RH. Approach to management of intussusception in adults: A new paradigm in the computed tomography era. Am Surg 2007; 73(11): 1098-105.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000313480707301104] [PMID: 18092641]
[7]
Tarchouli M, Ait Ali A. Adult intussusception: An uncommon condition and challenging management. Visc Med 2021; 37(2): 120-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000507380] [PMID: 33981752]
[8]
Chang CC, Chen YY, Chen YF, Lin CN, Yen HH, Lou HY. Adult intussusception in Asians: Clinical presentations, diagnosis, and treatment. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 22(11): 1767-71.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.04907.x] [PMID: 17914948]
[9]
Somma F, Faggian A, Serra N, et al. Bowel intussusceptions in adults: The role of imaging. Radiol Med 2015; 120(1): 105-17.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-014-0454-4] [PMID: 25115295]
[10]
Gupta RK, Agrawal CS, Yadav R, Bajracharya A, Sah PL. Intussusception in adults: Institutional review. Int J Surg 2011; 9(1): 91-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.10.003] [PMID: 20951844]
[11]
Al-Radaideh AM, Omari HZ, Bani-Hani KE. Adult intussusception : A 14-year retrospective study of clinical assessment and computed tomography diagnosis. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 2018; 81(3): 367-72.
[PMID: 30350523]
[12]
Tresoldi S, Kim YH, Blake MA, et al. Adult intestinal intussusception: Can abdominal MDCT distinguish an intussusception caused by a lead point? Abdom Imaging 2008; 33(5): 582-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9328-8] [PMID: 17924160]
[13]
Amr MA, Polites SF, Alzghari M, Onkendi EO, Grotz TE, Zielinski MD. Intussusception in adults and the role of evolving computed tomography technology. Am J Surg 2015; 209(3): 580-3.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.10.019] [PMID: 25770396]
[14]
Tan HL, Koh YX, Taufik M, Lye WK, Goh BKP, Ong HS. A clinical scoring system to predict the clinical sequelae of computed tomography diagnosed intussusception. World J Surg 2018; 42(3): 682-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4196-z] [PMID: 28916884]
[15]
Varban OA, Ardestani A, Azagury DE, Kis B, Brooks DC, Tavakkoli A. Contemporary management of adult intussusception: Who needs a resection? World J Surg 2013; 37(8): 1872-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2036-3] [PMID: 23571865]
[16]
Horton KM, Fishman EK. MDCT and 3D imaging in transient enteroenteric intussusception: Clinical observations and review of the literature. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 191(3): 736-42.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3741] [PMID: 18716102]
[17]
Lvoff N, Breiman RS, Coakley FV, Lu Y, Warren RS. Distinguishing features of self-limiting adult small-bowel intussusception identified at CT. Radiology 2003; 227(1): 68-72.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2272020455] [PMID: 12668740]
[18]
Sundaram B, Miller CN, Cohan RH, Schipper MJ, Francis IR. Can CT features be used to diagnose surgical adult bowel intussusceptions? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193(2): 471-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.08.1801] [PMID: 19620445]
[19]
Alexander R, Traverso P, Bolorunduro OB, et al. Profiling adult intussusception patients: Comparing colonic versus enteric intussusception. Am J Surg 2011; 202(4): 487-91.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.02.006] [PMID: 21943949]
[20]
Park SB, Ha HK, Kim AY, et al. The diagnostic role of abdominal CT imaging findings in adults intussusception: Focused on the vascular compromise. Eur J Radiol 2007; 62(3): 406-15.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.01.003] [PMID: 17412545]
[21]
Dollinger M, Bäumler W, Brunner SM, et al. Role of clinical and CT findings in the identification of adult small-bowel intussusception requiring surgical intervention. BJS Open 2021; 5(5): zrab076.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab076] [PMID: 34498667]
[22]
Fujimoto T, Fukuda T, Uetani M, et al. Unenhanced CT findings of vascular compromise in association with intussusceptions in adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176(5): 1167-71.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.176.5.1761167] [PMID: 11312175]
[23]
Onkendi EO, Grotz TE, Murray JA, Donohue JH. Adult intussusception in the last 25 years of modern imaging: Is surgery still indicated? J Gastrointest Surg 2011; 15(10): 1699-705.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1609-4] [PMID: 21830152]
[24]
Kim JW, Lee BH, Park SG, Kim BC, Lee S, Lee SJ. Factors predicting malignancy in adult intussusception: An experience in university-affiliated hospitals. Asian J Surg 2018; 41(1): 92-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.11.010] [PMID: 28131633]
[25]
Duc VT, Chien PC, Huyen LDM, Triet PNM. Differentiation between surgical and nonsurgical intussusception: A diagnostic model using multi-detector computed tomography. Acta Inform Med 2021; 29(1): 32-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.11.010] [PMID: 28131633]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy