Abstract
Introduction: This paper aimed to investigate, for the first time, the possibility of increasing the antibacterial activities of thymol (TH) by developing an encapsulating agent based on chitosan-grafted cyclodextrin. For this purpose, β-cyclodextrin was monosubstituted at position 6 via propargyl bromide, and chitosan’s amine groups were converted to azide functions. After alkylation and diazotization reactions, the grafting of β-cyclodextrin onto the chitosan (CS- βCD) was realized via click chemistry alkyne–azide cycloaddition.
Methods: The incorporation of TH into chitosan-grafted β-cyclodextrin (TH/CS-βCD) was performed by the freeze-drying method, and the encapsulation efficiency was investigated based on various mass ratios (TH:CS-βCD). The optimized inclusion complex was then thoroughly examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC).
Results: The antibacterial activity was assessed against Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Bacillus subtilis using broth-microdilution assay. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analysis demonstrated the successful grafting of β-cyclodextrin onto chitosan since the optimum mass ratio between TH and CS-βCD was 1:8 (w:w), corresponding to 78 ± 3.42% of encapsulation efficiency, while SEM, XRD, TGA and DSC confirmed the establishment of TH/CS-βCD inclusion complexes.
Conclusion: The in vitro investigation showed that TH/CS-βCD exhibited higher antibacterial properties compared to TH in free form.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.095] [PMID: 30552929]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.04.111] [PMID: 27211664]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11694-020-00665-0]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/iub.1935] [PMID: 30308112]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000093790] [PMID: 16763380]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.08.023]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201909049]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.10.027]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2014.05.037]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.111155] [PMID: 32600736]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.12.132] [PMID: 36572079]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.792737] [PMID: 35095804]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2021.118250]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123518] [PMID: 36773879]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym11020276] [PMID: 30960259]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16222-7] [PMID: 29150635]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6446(03)02933-7] [PMID: 14678739]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1521-3773(20010601)40:11<2004:AID-ANIE2004>3.0.CO;2-5] [PMID: 11433435]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12221-013-1058-7]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2009.06.010]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2011.06.028]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/3830819]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10204] [PMID: 36033293]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0732-8893(98)00160-6] [PMID: 10212747]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2023.114937] [PMID: 37267633]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/5973846]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2017.12.011]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12668-023-01135-9]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116075] [PMID: 32172888]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.03.026] [PMID: 31108733]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.10.070] [PMID: 34673101]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2019.05.061]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40104-015-0055-7] [PMID: 26705471]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/24701556.2019.1624569]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.116] [PMID: 25473498]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107716]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01744] [PMID: 32849374]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12091868] [PMID: 37176927]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.114888] [PMID: 36334453]