Abstract
Background: Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) worsened during the COVID-19 lockdowns, but their progression thereafter is unknown. We present the first longitudinal study tracking them before, during, and after restrictions.
Objectives: To describe the effect of the COVID-19 mandatory lockdowns on Cognitive and Neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s Disease (AD).
Methods: Cohort of 48 patients with amnestic MCI and 38 with AD in Lima, Peru. They received three rounds of cognitive (RUDAS, CDR, M@T), behavioral (NPI), and functional (ADCS-ADL) assessments. We assessed the change in score means across the time points and for each domain of NPS and tracked the changes in individual patients.
Results: RUDAS declined 0.9 (SD 1.0) from baseline to lockdown and 0.7 (SD 1.0) after restrictions. M@T declined 1.0 (SD 1.5) from baseline to lockdown and 1.4 (SD 2.0) after restrictions. CDR worsened in 72 patients (83.72%) from baseline to post-lockdown. NPI worsened by 10 (SD 8.3) from baseline to lockdown but improved by 4.8 (SD 6.4) after restrictions. Proportionally, 81.3% of all patients had worsened NPS during the lockdowns, but only 10.7% saw an increase thereafter. Improvement was statistically significant for specific NPS domains except hallucinations, delusions, and appetite changes. Anxiety, irritability, apathy, and disinhibition returned to baseline levels.
Conclusion: Following confinement, cognition continued to decline, but NPS demonstrated either stability or improvement. This highlights the role modifiable risk factors may have on the progression of NPS.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70223-4] [PMID: 20934914]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2011.01.003] [PMID: 21292041]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2015.09.069] [PMID: 26540080]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200523030-00004] [PMID: 15836005]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2019.01.002] [PMID: 30911601]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101047] [PMID: 34386758]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.puhip.2020.100020] [PMID: 34171047]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15333175211039089] [PMID: 34416114]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.579842] [PMID: 33132939]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb02542.x] [PMID: 9475452]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00002093-199700112-00005] [PMID: 9236950]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15333175221104354] [PMID: 35656899]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00374] [PMID: 32477248]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000365280] [PMID: 25298775]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.140.6.566] [PMID: 7104545]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n1442] [PMID: 34088698]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.711658] [PMID: 34393864]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40520-022-02113-z] [PMID: 35325450]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.578015] [PMID: 33033486]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgs.16644] [PMID: 32516441]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00866] [PMID: 33005158]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12092] [PMID: 33283036]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1567205015666180119092427] [PMID: 29357799]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264087] [PMID: 35544521]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05687-w] [PMID: 35165292]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100848] [PMID: 33997742]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30203-0] [PMID: 32437679]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2021.12.020] [PMID: 34973396]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2022.120162] [PMID: 35121209]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-210335] [PMID: 34092646]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.703481] [PMID: 34335338]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533317520976720] [PMID: 33295781]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.585540] [PMID: 33192732]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1041610220001593] [PMID: 32729446]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afab044] [PMID: 33770167]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.14040480] [PMID: 25585033]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2019.00344] [PMID: 31969812]