Abstract
Background: Implant as long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is ideal for Indonesian women. Two-rod implant (2x75mg levonorgestrel) is the most common implant used in Indonesia. Another alternative method is a one-rod implant (1x150mg levonorgestrel).
Objective: This study evaluated the effectiveness, changes in body weight (BW), and menstrual cycle between the one-rod and two-rod implant acceptors.
Methods: This study was an RCT design with phase II clinical trials; 179 subjects were recruited. Subjects were met with inclusion and exclusion criteria and divided into one-rod and two-rod groups. The variables were evaluated within 12 months.
Results: This study involved 70 subjects in the one-rod implant group and 66 subjects in the two-rod implant group. At 12 months, there were no differences between the effectiveness of the two types of contraception, and pregnancy was reported in 1.26% vs 1.31%. The concentration of levonorgestrel in the one-rod group was 0.31 ng/dL as the median (IQR: 0.33 ng/dL) and 0.34 ng/dL as the median (IQR: 0.33 ng/dL) in the two-rod group (p = 0.438). The BW in the two-rod group increased significantly in month six (p = 0.035) and twelve (p = 0.017) but not in the one-rod group. Menstrual cycle changes occurred in 51.4% of subjects and 57.6% of subjects in the one- and two-rod groups (p = 0.584), respectively.
Conclusion: At 12 months, one-rod and two-rod implants had similar effectiveness and concentration of levonorgestrel. Significant weight gain happened in the two-rod group, and the weight gain increased in months six and twelve. Menstrual cycle changes have occurred in both.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.32771/inajog.v8i2.1109]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0897190015585751] [PMID: 26033795]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3583156] [PMID: 16104651]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAJC.S55968]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v11i4.4937]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.32771/inajog.v2i3.393]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2013.11.002] [PMID: 24439674]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2018.05.009] [PMID: 29777663]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0010-7824(03)00079-9] [PMID: 12878283]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)55150-4] [PMID: 1623994]