Abstract
Background: Cefepime is a fourth-generation cephalosporin with a broad spectrum coverage and anti-pseudomonal activity. The safety profile of cefepime was relatively favourable until neurotoxicity was first reported in 1999. Despite cefepime-induced neurotoxicity (CIN), it continues to be a principal part of parenteral treatment for various infections.
Objective: The study aimed to determine the incidence and risk factors for CIN compared to other antibiotics.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 738 patients over eight months in Kasturba Medical College and Hospital, Manipal, India. Patients with cefepime were selected as study cohort (SC; n= 496), and other antibiotics were included in the reference cohort (RC; n=242).
Results: The results showed that 53 (10.7%) patients developed neurotoxicity in the SC, whereas 12 (5%) patients in the RC. A significant association was found between neurotoxicity and cefepime use (X2 =6.641; p=0.01). SC has a 2.29 times increased risk of neurotoxicity than RC (OR: 2.29; 95% CI: 1.2-4.38). Risk estimation showed that renal failure patients had a 5.5 times higher risk for CIN than non-renal failure patients (OR: 5.5; 95% CI: 2.98 - 10.17). CIN symptoms were disorientation (38.5%), loss of consciousness (23.1%), drowsiness (18.5%), etc. The calculated number needed to harm (NNH) for cefepime was 17.2.
Conclusion: The study found a higher incidence of CIN compared to other antibiotics-induced neurotoxicity and a harmful association between cefepime use and CIN development. Besides, renal failure is a risk factor for CIN. Therefore, the study warrants the use of cefepime, where no other alternatives are available.
Keywords: Adverse effects, antibiotics, cefepime, drug safety, neurotoxicity, neurotoxic effects.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idc.2009.06.007] [PMID: 19909894]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/14.9.2265] [PMID: 10489256]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3908(03)00188-6] [PMID: 12871648]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1345/aph.1L307] [PMID: 19033476]
[PMID: 19299850]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkn256] [PMID: 18565972]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000187079.12413.6a] [PMID: 16344542]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-001-1170-9] [PMID: 11907668]
[PMID: 18651542]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0987-7053(00)00234-3] [PMID: 11191931]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1592/phco.26.8.1169] [PMID: 16863493]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2005.09.010] [PMID: 16278098]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704314] [PMID: 14704665]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfm713] [PMID: 18175786]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182783b72] [PMID: 23269131]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc13094] [PMID: 24200036]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx170] [PMID: 29071284]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1856-1] [PMID: 29137682]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01595-08] [PMID: 20625153]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-4718-z] [PMID: 28238055]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00350] [PMID: 29695966]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.18700/jnc.190109]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1966.00470140003001] [PMID: 5945968]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00365548.2011.581308] [PMID: 21604923]