Abstract
Background: Heterologous combinations in vaccine design are an effective approach to promote T cell activity and antiviral effects. The goal of this study was to compare the homologous and heterologous regimens targeting the Nef-Tat fusion antigen to develop a human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) therapeutic vaccine candidate.
Methods: At first, the DNA and protein constructs harboring HIV-1 Nef and the first exon of Tat as linked form (pcDNA-nef-tat and Nef-Tat protein) were prepared in large scale and high purity. The generation of the Nef-Tat protein was performed in the E. coli expression system using an IPTG inducer. Then, we evaluated and compared immune responses of homologous DNA prime/ DNA boost, homologous protein prime/ protein boost, and heterologous DNA prime/protein boost regimens in BALB/c mice. Finally, the ability of mice splenocytes to secret cytokines after exposure to single-cycle replicable (SCR) HIV-1 was compared between immunized and control groups in vitro.
Results: The nef-tat gene was successfully subcloned in eukaryotic pcDNA3.1 (-) and prokaryotic pET-24a (+) expression vectors. The recombinant Nef-Tat protein was generated in the E. coli Rosetta strain under optimized conditions as a clear band of ~ 35 kDa detected on SDS-PAGE. Moreover, transfection of pcDNA-nef-tat into HEK-293T cells was successfully performed using Lipofectamine 2000, as confirmed by western blotting. The immunization studies showed that heterologous DNA prime/protein boost regimen could significantly elicit the highest levels of Ig- G2a, IFN-γ, and Granzyme B in mice as compared to homologous DNA/DNA and protein/protein regimens. Moreover, the secretion of IFN-γ was higher in DNA/protein regimens than in DNA/DNA and protein/protein regimens after exposure of mice splenocytes to SCR HIV-1 in vitro.
Conclusion: The chimeric HIV-1 Nef-Tat antigen was highly immunogenic, especially when applied in a heterologous prime/ boost regimen. This regimen could direct immune response toward cellular immunity (Th1 and CTL activity) and increase IFN-γ secretion after virus exposure.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41579-023-00914-1] [PMID: 37344551]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2023.02.001] [PMID: 36894436]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10529-022-03339-7] [PMID: 36550339]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11050975] [PMID: 37243079]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-03025-0] [PMID: 34750543]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2022.100423] [PMID: 36618081]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2023.168297] [PMID: 37797831]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2023.2157818] [PMID: 36508550]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11020280] [PMID: 36851159]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.10.045] [PMID: 31669566]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coviro.2011.08.003] [PMID: 22440782]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.11.062] [PMID: 26691569]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2019.1640117] [PMID: 31271322]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.531] [PMID: 35229055]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084234] [PMID: 24391921]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.REV120.012317] [PMID: 32862141]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01322-19] [PMID: 31578291]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11481-020-09964-1] [PMID: 33123948]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom13060881] [PMID: 37371461]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jvi.67.1.277-287.1993] [PMID: 8416373]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22010317] [PMID: 33396807]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/345084a0] [PMID: 2184372]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmv.2031] [PMID: 30609200]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/aac.00417-23] [PMID: 37874295]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(88)90263-2] [PMID: 2849510]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(88)90262-0] [PMID: 2849509]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2009.11.046] [PMID: 19925791]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2021.07.001] [PMID: 34242726]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2020.1712199] [PMID: 31957513]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imlet.2017.06.003] [PMID: 28602843]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-10-297] [PMID: 24073803]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.09.180] [PMID: 15504339]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000485501] [PMID: 29393161]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12033-018-0114-3] [PMID: 30167966]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9040373] [PMID: 33921215]
[PMID: 29755642]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.05.005] [PMID: 31097410]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2024.122456] [PMID: 38266814]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hiv.13576] [PMID: 37936563]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adbi.202300402] [PMID: 37840398]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.00847] [PMID: 29780381]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kes171] [PMID: 22772323]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109406] [PMID: 36461600]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/nnm.15.160] [PMID: 26400459]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.590780] [PMID: 33193428]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkh132] [PMID: 14985273]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sji.12184] [PMID: 24813074]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41541-018-0086-0] [PMID: 30302284]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10529-020-03060-3] [PMID: 33386500]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0264-410X(02)00258-X] [PMID: 12163269]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00171-06] [PMID: 16731926]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nm.1935] [PMID: 19219024]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12977-016-0261-1] [PMID: 27277839]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0264-410X(03)00538-3] [PMID: 14604567]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/135965350501000212] [PMID: 15865223]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0b013e3280112cd1] [PMID: 17117011]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.168.1.197] [PMID: 11751963]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0711406] [PMID: 19234184]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2005.07.016] [PMID: 16243561]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00705-021-05158-z] [PMID: 34390393]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4690-6-50] [PMID: 19467159]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00430-019-00583-z] [PMID: 30834965]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.36233/0507-4088-83] [PMID: 35019252]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines7030099] [PMID: 31454973]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms25031704] [PMID: 38338977]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4690-11-30] [PMID: 24742347]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.02.006] [PMID: 21338681]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0b013e32831392d4] [PMID: 18832884]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.10.038] [PMID: 19879233]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1054-3589(07)55011-8] [PMID: 17586321]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4690-5-84] [PMID: 18808677]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00288-16] [PMID: 27840851]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12977-023-00618-7] [PMID: 37004071]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00705-014-1981-y] [PMID: 24435162]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25793] [PMID: 34806296]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imr.12506] [PMID: 28133794]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coi.2009.05.016] [PMID: 19500964]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir334] [PMID: 21765081]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.12.060] [PMID: 18724414]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2005.10.009] [PMID: 16375915]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1567201814666171129210654] [PMID: 29189153]