Abstract
Background: Ricin is the most toxic protein known. It is part of the ribosome-inactivating proteins, RIPs, type 2, which has generated importance in his research; it is possible to detoxify this protein with phenolic compounds; however, it is essential to understand how this detoxification occurs. To analyze using electrophoresis, UV-visible spectroscopy, and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) the protein ricin with the flavonol quercetin, understanding the detoxification process.
Methods: The UV-visible analysis was performed on both the supernatant and the precipitate of the samples; these results were analyzed using one-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) and a Tukey test with a significance level of 0.05.
Results: 34.9 μg/mL of total protein and 4.2 μg / mL of ricin were obtained in the extraction method. Eight interactions were carried out, and all presented precipitation, observing through the electrophoresis technique a decrease in the bands corresponding to the protein; these results were analyzed with HPLC observing a decrease in the size of the area of the peaks in the chromatograms.
Conclusion: The results obtained in this study suggest an agglomeration of the protein, generating a precipitate that could benefit the protein's inactivation as a detoxification process.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/neu.2014.3] [PMID: 25279413]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C4FO00209A] [PMID: 24889137]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2017.1354017]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.1998.tb01670.x] [PMID: 9838798]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/BJN19980106] [PMID: 9849355]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2008.04.015] [PMID: 18562042]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.06.032] [PMID: 28763961]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.201000044] [PMID: 21226137]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1040869059096] [PMID: 16047496]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/07388551.2014.923986] [PMID: 24963701]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2012.06.022] [PMID: 22732728]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1381612824666181106091303] [PMID: 30398104]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms11041321] [PMID: 20480022]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01635580903285098] [PMID: 20155620]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.15835/nbha46110992]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0278-6915(95)00077-1] [PMID: 8847003]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.03.008] [PMID: 18417116]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2011.08.010] [PMID: 21856292]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.002713] [PMID: 27405810]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf000981z] [PMID: 11262053]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jns.2016.41] [PMID: 28620474]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0041-0101(01)00158-1] [PMID: 11595634]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prot.340100308] [PMID: 1881880]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prot.340100309] [PMID: 1881881]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins12120784] [PMID: 33302573]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins11060324] [PMID: 31174319]
[PMID: 1817137]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/excr.1993.1142] [PMID: 8388800]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v11i3.2751]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.03.017]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12360] [PMID: 26150062]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15636-7] [PMID: 29133924]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pr8111393]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2016.03.024] [PMID: 27017946]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S1061934818080026]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins7124856] [PMID: 26703723]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2019.02.003] [PMID: 30790577]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.03.024] [PMID: 29522821]