Effect of Continued Midwifery Support in Labor on Childbirth Experience
and Self-esteem of Primipara Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Nasrin      Soleimani; Mansoureh      Refaei; Farideh      Kazemi

doi:10.2174/1573404820666230519123920

Abstract

Introduction: During labor and delivery, mothers should be supported by people who give them comfort. The present study aims to determine the effect of continued midwifery support in labor on the childbirth experience and self-esteem of nulliparous women 6 weeks after childbirth.

Methods: This randomized controlled trial was performed in 2021 on 70 pregnant women in the delivery ward. Participants were allocated to two groups through balanced block randomization. First, participants completed questionnaires. In the intervention group, the researcher stayed at the mother’s bedside and accompanied the mother continuously throughout the labor and up to 2 hours after childbirth. Both groups received routine care. Six weeks after childbirth, participants in both groups were contacted to complete the CEQ 2.0 and Rosenberg self-esteem questionnaires. The required data were collected and analyzed at a significance level of 0.05.

Results: The mean (± SD) of childbirth experience 6 weeks after childbirth was 3.1 (± 0.2) in the intervention group and 2.6 (± 0.3) in the control group, and this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001) (Cohen’s d = 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1, 2.3). The comparison of the mean of maternal self-esteem showed that this rate in the intervention group was 2.1 scores higher than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.02) (Cohen’s d = 0.6; 95% CI: 0.1, 1.1).

Conclusions: Continued support of the midwife in labor and up to 2 hours after childbirth can lead to a better childbirth experience and enhance the mother’s self-esteem up to 6 weeks after childbirth.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
Dencker, A.; Taft, C.; Bergqvist, L.; Lilja, H.; Berg, M. Childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ): Development and evaluation of a multidimensional instrument. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth,  2010, 10(1), 81.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-10-81] [PMID: 21143961]

[2]
Zamani, P.; Ziaie, T. Mokhtari Lakeh, Kazemnejad Leili. childbirth experience and its related socio-demographic factors in mothers admitted to postpartum ward of AL Zahra Hospital of Rasht City, (Iran). Majallah-i Danishgah-i Ulum-i Pizishki-i Qum,  2019, 12(11), 70-78.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/qums.12.11.8]

[3]
Fenaroli, V.; Molgora, S.; Dodaro, S. et al. The childbirth experience: Obstetric and psychological predictors in Italian primiparous women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth,  2019, 19(1), 419.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2561-7] [PMID: 31730468]

[4]
Ghanbari-Homayi, S.; Dencker, A.; Fardiazar, Z. et al. Validation of the Iranian version of the childbirth experience questionnaire 2.0. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth,  2019, 19(1), 465.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2606-y] [PMID: 31801477]

[5]
Pang, M.W.; Leung, T.N.; Lau, T.K.; Hang Chung, T.K. Impact of first childbirth on changes in women’s preference for mode of delivery: follow-up of a longitudinal observational study. Birth,  2008, 35(2), 121-128.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00225.x] [PMID: 18507583]

[6]
Bohren, M.A.; Hofmeyr, G.J.; Sakala, C.; Fukuzawa, R.K.; Cuthbert, A. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.,  2017, 7(7), CD003766.
 [PMID: 28681500]

[7]
World Health Organization Standards for improving quality of maternal and newborn care in health facilities., 2016.

[8]
Oosthuizen, S.J.; Bergh, A.M.; Pattinson, R.C.; Grimbeek, J. It does matter where you come from: mothers’ experiences of childbirth in midwife obstetric units, Tshwane, South Africa. Reprod. Health,  2017, 14(1), 151.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0411-5] [PMID: 29145897]

[9]
Darvishi, M.; Ranjbaran, M.; Jourabchi, Z.; Jafarimanesh, H. Effect of the presence of midwife and non-midwife companion on labor pain, duration of delivery, and amount of oxytocin drops in primiparous women: a clinical trial study. Majallah-i Zanan, Mamai va Nazai-i Iran,  2019, 22(4), 63-72.

[10]
Lunda, P.; Minnie, C.S.; Benadé, P. Women’s experiences of continuous support during childbirth: a meta-synthesis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth,  2018, 18(1), 167.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1755-8] [PMID: 29764406]

[11]
Hodnett, E.D. Caregiver support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.,  2000, (2), CD000199.
 [PMID: 10796179]

[12]
Namujju, J.; Muhindo, R.; Mselle, L.T.; Waiswa, P.; Nankumbi, J.; Muwanguzi, P. Childbirth experiences and their derived meaning: a qualitative study among postnatal mothers in Mbale regional referral hospital, Uganda. Reprod. Health,  2018, 15(1), 183.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-018-0628-y] [PMID: 30390685]

[13]
Nabi Rahimiyan, M; Rahnavard, T; Zamani Lari, M. Effect of the one to one midwifery care during labor on modes of delivery and duration of labor and increase satisfaction with childbirth. Biosci Biotechnol Res Asia,  2015, 12(Special-Edn2), 839-45.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.13005/bbra/2267]

[14]
Kashanian, M.; Javadi, F.; Haghighi, M.M. Effect of continuous support during labor on duration of labor and rate of cesarean delivery. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet.,  2010, 109(3), 198-200.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.11.028] [PMID: 20152972]

[15]
Safarzadeh, A.; Beigi, M.; Salehian, T.; Khojasteh, F.; Burayri, T.; Navabirigi, S. Effect of Doula support on labour pain and outcomes in Primiparous women in Zahedan, southeastern Iran: A randomized controlled trial. J. Pain Relief,  2012, 1(5), 2167-0846.

[16]
Leveno, K.J.; Spong, C.Y.; Dashe, J.S. et al. Williams Obstetrics, 25th ed; McGraw-Hill Education, 2018. 

[17]
Babington, L.M.; Malone, L.; Kelley, B.R. Perceived social support, self esteem, and pregnancy status among Dominican adolescents. Appl. Nurs. Res.,  2015, 28(2), 121-126.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2014.08.001] [PMID: 25262424]

[18]
Dolatian, M.; Mirabzadeh, A.; Setareh Forouzan, A. et al. Correlation between self-esteem and perceived stress in pregnancy and ways to coping with stress. Pajoohande,  2013, 18(3), 148-155.

[19]
Cicchetti, D.V.; Sparrow, S.A. Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: Applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. Am. J. Ment. Defic.,  1981, 86(2), 127-137.
 [PMID: 7315877]

[20]
Lathrop, A.; Bonsack, C.F.; Haas, D.M. Women’s experiences with water birth: A matched groups prospective study. Birth,  2018, 45(4), 416-423.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/birt.12362] [PMID: 29900579]

[21]
Cohen, J. Statistical power analysis for the social sciences., 1988.

[22]
Corbett, C.A.; Callister, L.C.; Gettys, J.P. Hickman JRJTJop, nursing n. Mean Giving Birth,  2017, 31(3), 207-215.

[23]
Halldorsdottir, S.; Karlsdottir, S.I.J.M. Journeying through labour and delivery: Perceptions of women who have given birth. Midwifery, 1996.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0266-6138(96)90002-9]

[24]
Murray, L.; Windsor, C.; Parker, E. The experiences of African women giving birth in Brisbane, Australia. Health Care Women Int.,  2010, 31(5), 458-472.

[25]
Bergströِm M, Kieler H, Waldenströِm U. Effects of natural childbirth preparation versus standard antenatal education on epidural rates, experience of childbirth and parental stress in mothers and fathers: A randomised controlled multicentre trial. BJOG,  2009, 116(9), 1167-1176.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02144.x] [PMID: 19538406]

[26]
Eom, S.Y.; Kim, E.S.; Kim, H.J.; Bang, Y.O. Effects of a one session spouse-support enhancement childbirth education on childbirth self-efficacy and perception of childbirth experience in women and their husbands. J. Korean Acad. Nurs.,  2012, 42(4), 599-607.

[27]
Simkin, P.; Hanson, L.; Ancheta, R. The Labor Progress Handbook: Early Interventions to Prevent and Treat Dystocia; Wiley, 2017. 

[28]
Koumouitzes-Douvia, J. Women’s perceptions of their doula support. J. Perinat. Educ.,  2006, 15(4), 34-40.

[29]
Hofmeyr, G.J.; Nikodem, C.; Wolman, W.L.; Chalmers, B.; Kramer, T. Companionship to modify the clinical birth environment: effects on progress and perceptions of labour, and breastfeeding. BJOG,  1991, 98(8), 756-764.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.tb13479.x] [PMID: 1911582]

[30]
Simkin, P.J.B. Just another day in a woman’s life? Women’s long‐term perceptions of their first birth experience. Birth,  1991, 18(1), 90-117.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.1991.tb00103.x]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite

Journal Information

For Authors

For Editors

For Reviewers

Explore Articles

Open Access

Open Access Articles

For Visitors

DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573404820666230519123920	Print ISSN 1573-4048
Publisher Name Bentham Science Publisher	Online ISSN 1875-6581

Current Women`s Health Reviews

Effect of Continued Midwifery Support in Labor on Childbirth Experience and Self-esteem of Primipara Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract Play Pause

Graphical Abstract

Abstract