Abstract
Background: The most widespread signalling system in the brain is the cholinergic system, which plays a central role in the progress of Alzheimer’s diseases (AD). Current AD treatment primarily targets the neuronal acetylcholinesterase (AChE) enzyme. The finding of AChE activity may play a vital role in optimizing assays for drug discovery of new AChE inhibiting agents. During in-vitro assay of AChE activity, the use of various organic solvents is imperative.
Objective: The present study is designed to evaluate the effect of different organic solvents on enzyme activity and enzyme kinetics.
Method: Organic solvents' AChE inhibitory potential (including enzyme kinetics: Vmax, Km and Kcat) was evaluated using substrate velocity curve by using non-linear reversion Michaelis-Menten kinetic function.
Results: DMSO was found to have the most potent AChE inhibitory effect, followed by acetonitrile and ethanol. The kinetic study revealed DMSO as a mixed inhibitory effect (competitive/noncompetitive manner), ethanol as non-competitive, and acetonitrile as a competitive inhibitor of the AChE enzyme. Methanol has shown a negligible impact on enzyme inhibition and kinetics, suggesting its suitability for the AChE assay.
Conclusion: We assume that our study results will help design the experimental protocols and support analyzing investigational outcomes while screening and biological evaluation of new molecules using methanol as solvent/cosolvent.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1570159X13666150716165726] [PMID: 26813123]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.06957.x] [PMID: 19292865]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14756366.2018.1543288] [PMID: 30734597]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11064-005-2612-5] [PMID: 16018582]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awy132] [PMID: 29850777]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2013.07.001] [PMID: 23850704]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.7b00344] [PMID: 29017007]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2006.03.004] [PMID: 16635808]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-2952(61)90145-9] [PMID: 13726518]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2020.101559]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbt.22478] [PMID: 32124518]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2019.11.005] [PMID: 31867220]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.09.057] [PMID: 27721157]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.etp.2007.11.004] [PMID: 18407480]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fj.01-0148hyp] [PMID: 11427490]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00055.2008] [PMID: 18653726]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80040-9] [PMID: 10368299]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0229(96)00204-9]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000469242] [PMID: 3032606]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0020-711X(91)90185-P] [PMID: 1999262]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/QR9662000001]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules22071192] [PMID: 28714881]