Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Current Medical Imaging

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4056
ISSN (Online): 1875-6603

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Research Article

Clinical Value of Deep Vein Thrombosis Density on Lower-Extremity CT Venography: Prediction of Pulmonary Thromboembolism

Author(s): Jae Hyeop Jung, Jin Kyem Kim, Taeho Kim and Dong Kyu Kim*

Volume 20, 2024

Published on: 24 May, 2023

Article ID: e050423215455 Pages: 7

DOI: 10.2174/1573405620666230405104312

Price: $65

Abstract

Aim: Diagnosis of pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) can be delayed if the signs and symptoms of patients are nonspecific.

Introduction: To assess the clinical value of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) density on computed tomography (CT) venography for predicting PTE.

Methods: From 2016 to 2021, patients with DVT diagnosed on lower-extremity CT venography were included. Of these patients, those without PTE were classified into ‘DVT-only group’ and those with PTE were classified into the ‘DVT with PTE group’. The DVT Hounsfield unit (HU) density was measured by drawing free-hand region-of-interests within the thrombus at the most proximal filling defect level. The risk factors associated with PTE were identified by using multivariate logistic regression analysis. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the value of DVT density for predicting the risk of PTE.

Results and Discussion: This study included 177 patients with a mean age of 41.7 ± 10.3 years (DVT-only group: 105 patients; DVT with PTE group: 72 patients). DVT density was significantly higher in DVT with the PTE group than DVT-only group (66.8HU ± 8.7 vs. 57.9HU ± 11.1, p < 0.001). The ROC analysis revealed that the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity for predicting the risk of PTE were 0.737, 72.2%, and 66.7%, respectively, at a DVT density cutoff of 63.0 HU. On univariate and multivariate analysis, DVT density was the only significant risk factor associated with PTE.

Conclusion: Higher DVT density was a significant risk factor for PTE. In addition, DVT density could be a predictive factor for PTE.

[1]
Jeong MJ, Kwon H, Noh M, et al. Relationship of lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis density at CT venography to acute pulmonary embolism and the risk of postthrombotic syndrome. Radiology 2019; 293(3): 687-94.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019190358] [PMID: 31592733]
[2]
Fowkes FJI, Price JF, Fowkes FGR. Incidence of diagnosed deep vein thrombosis in the general population: Systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2003; 25(1): 1-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/ejvs.2002.1778] [PMID: 12525804]
[3]
Galanaud JP, Holcroft CA, Rodger MA, et al. Predictors of post-thrombotic syndrome in a population with a first deep vein thrombosis and no primary venous insufficiency. J Thromb Haemost 2013; 11(3): 474-80.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jth.12106] [PMID: 23279046]
[4]
Eberhardt RT, Raffetto JD. Chronic venous insufficiency. Circulation 2005; 111(18): 2398-409.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000164199.72440.08] [PMID: 15883226]
[5]
Huisman MV, Klok FA. Current challenges in diagnostic imaging of venous thromboembolism. Blood 2015; 126(21): 2376-82.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2015-05-640979] [PMID: 26585807]
[6]
Liu Y, Xie M, Gao X, Liu R. Predictive value of circulating microRNA-134 levels for early diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism: meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Transl Res 2021; 14(4): 744-53.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12265-020-10087-4] [PMID: 33409960]
[7]
Giordano NJ, Jansson PS, Young MN, Hagan KA, Kabrhel C. Epidemiology, pathophysiology, stratification, and natural history of pulmonary embolism. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2017; 20(3): 135-40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.tvir.2017.07.002] [PMID: 29029707]
[8]
Li Y, He Y, Meng Y, et al. Development and validation of a prediction model to estimate risk of acute pulmonary embolism in deep vein thrombosis patients. Sci Rep 2022; 12(1): 649.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04657-y] [PMID: 35027609]
[9]
Venkatesh AK, Kline JA, Courtney DM, et al. Evaluation of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department and consistency with a national quality measure: Quantifying the opportunity for improvement. Arch Intern Med 2012; 172(13): 1028-32.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2012.1804] [PMID: 22664742]
[10]
Anderson D, Rodger M, Ginsberg J, et al. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: Increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thromb Haemost 2000; 83(3): 416-20.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1613830] [PMID: 10744147]
[11]
Penaloza A, Soulié C, Moumneh T, et al. Pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria (PERC) rule in European patients with low implicit clinical probability (PERCEPIC): A multicentre, prospective, observational study. Lancet Haematol 2017; 4(12): e615-21.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(17)30210-7] [PMID: 29150390]
[12]
Le Gal G, Righini M, Roy PM, et al. Prediction of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: The revised Geneva score. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144(3): 165-71.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-144-3-200602070-00004] [PMID: 16461960]
[13]
Hendriksen JMT, Geersing GJ, Lucassen WAM, et al. Diagnostic prediction models for suspected pulmonary embolism: Systematic review and independent external validation in primary care. BMJ 2015; 351: h4438.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h4438] [PMID: 26349907]
[14]
Cham MD, Yankelevitz DF, Shaham D, et al. Deep venous thrombosis: Detection by using indirect CT venography. Radiology 2000; 216(3): 744-51.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.216.3.r00se44744] [PMID: 10966705]
[15]
Kirchhof K, Welzel T, Mecke C, Zoubaa S, Sartor K. Differentiation of white, mixed, and red thrombi: Value of CT in estimation of the prognosis of thrombolysis phantom study. Radiology 2003; 228(1): 126-30.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2273020530] [PMID: 12728185]
[16]
Martin Bland J, Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 327(8476): 307-10.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8] [PMID: 2868172]
[17]
Mokin M, Morr S, Natarajan SK, et al. Thrombus density predicts successful recanalization with Solitaire stent retriever thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: Table 1. J Neurointerv Surg 2015; 7(2): 104-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-011017] [PMID: 24510378]
[18]
Puig J, Pedraza S, Demchuk A, et al. Quantification of thrombus hounsfield units on noncontrast CT predicts stroke subtype and early recanalization after intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012; 33(1): 90-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2878] [PMID: 22158924]
[19]
Cho ES, Chung JJ, Kim S, Kim JH, Yu JS, Yoon CS. CT venography for deep vein thrombosis using a low tube voltage (100 kVp) setting could increase venous enhancement and reduce the amount of administered iodine. Korean J Radiol 2013; 14(2): 183-93.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2013.14.2.183] [PMID: 23482914]
[20]
Sasaki T, Fujimoto Y, Ishitoya S, et al. Improved detectability of thromboses of the lower limb using low kilovoltage computed tomography. Medicine 2018; 97(6): e9775.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009775] [PMID: 29419670]
[21]
Oda S, Utsunomiya D, Funama Y, et al. Evaluation of deep vein thrombosis with reduced radiation and contrast material dose at computed tomography venography: Clinical application of a combined iterative reconstruction and low-tube-voltage technique. Circ J 2012; 76(11): 2614-22.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-12-0032] [PMID: 22784997]
[22]
Park CK, Choo KS, Jeon UB, et al. Image quality and radiation dose of 128-slice dual-source CT venography using low kilovoltage combined with high-pitch scanning and automatic tube current modulation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013; 29(S1): 47-51.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-013-0252-4] [PMID: 23748369]
[23]
Schindera ST, Winklehner A, Alkadhi H, et al. Effect of automatic tube voltage selection on image quality and radiation dose in abdominal CT angiography of various body sizes: A phantom study. Clin Radiol 2013; 68(2): e79-86.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2012.10.007] [PMID: 23219454]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy