Generic placeholder image

Current Medical Imaging

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4056
ISSN (Online): 1875-6603

Research Article

Preliminary Investigation of Normal Pancreas Elasticity using Point Shear Wave Elastography

Author(s): Fahad F. Almutairi*

Volume 19, Issue 12, 2023

Published on: 09 March, 2023

Article ID: e100223213589 Pages: 5

DOI: 10.2174/1573405619666230210151754

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: Point shear wave elastography (pSWE) is used to provide quantitative information about the elasticity of the tissues. It has been used in many clinical applications to identify diseases early. This study aims to assess the suitability of pSWE to evaluate pancreas tissue stiffness and provide normal reference values for healthy pancreas tissues.

Methods: This study was conducted in the diagnostic department at a tertiary care hospital between October and December 2021. Sixteen healthy volunteers (eight men and eight women) participated. Pancreas elasticity measurements were obtained in different regions of interest (head, body, and tail). Scanning was performed by a certified sonographer using Philips EPIC7 ultrasound systems (Philips Ultrasound; Bothel, WA, USA).

Results: The mean velocity of the head of the pancreas was 1.3 ± 0.3 m/s (median: 1.2 m/s), the body was 1.4 ± 0.3 m/s (median: 1.4 m/s), and the tail was 1.4 ± 0.4 m/s (median: 1.2 m/s). The mean dimension was 17 ± 3 mm, 14 ± 4 mm, and 14 ± 6 mm for the head, body, and tail. The correlation of pancreas velocity across different segments and dimensions shows no significant difference with p values of 0.39 and 0.11, respectively.

Conclusion: This study shows that assessing the elasticity of the pancreas using pSWE is possible. A combination of SWVs measurements and dimensions could provide an early evaluation of pancreas status. Further studies including pancreatic disease patients are recommended.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
Ouyang G, Pan G, Liu Q, et al. The global, regional, and national burden of pancreatitis in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. BMC Med 2020; 18(1): 388.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01859-5] [PMID: 33298026]
[2]
Cho J, Scragg R, Petrov MS. Risk of mortality and hospitalization after post-pancreatitis diabetes mellitus vs. type 2 diabetes mellitus: A population-based matched cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol 2019; 114(5): 804-12.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000000225] [PMID: 31021833]
[3]
Weiss FU, Laemmerhirt F, Lerch MM. Etiology and risk factors of acute and chronic pancreatitis. Visc Med 2019; 35(2): 73-81.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000499138] [PMID: 31192240]
[4]
Sepúlveda-Copete M, Satizabal-Padridin N, Hidalgo-Cardona A, Criollo-Gutiérrez BD, Tobón-Guevara A, Castro-Llanos AM. Clinical and epidemiological description of patients with chronic pancreatitis treated at a quaternary care hospital in Cali, 2011-2017. Rev Colomb Gastroenterol 2021; 36: 30-8.
[5]
Conwell DL, Lee LS, Yadav D, et al. American pancreatic association practice guidelines in chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas 2014; 43(8): 1143-62.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0000000000000237] [PMID: 25333398]
[6]
Frøkjær JB, Akisik F, Farooq A, et al. Guidelines for the diagnostic cross sectional imaging and severity scoring of chronic pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2018; 18(7): 764-73.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2018.08.012] [PMID: 30177434]
[7]
Corral JE, Das A, Bruno MJ, Wallace MB. Cost-effectiveness of pancreatic cancer surveillance in high-risk individuals: An economic analysis. Pancreas 2019; 48(4): 526-36.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0000000000001268] [PMID: 30946242]
[8]
Dietrich CF, Hocke M. Elastography of the pancreas, current view. Clin Endosc 2019; 52(6): 533-40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.156] [PMID: 31311914]
[9]
Chou SHS, Baikpour M, Zhang W, Mercaldo SF, Lehman CD, Samir AE. Shear-wave elastography of the breast: Impact of technical image quality parameters on diagnostic accuracy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021; 216(5): 1205-15.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.19.22728] [PMID: 33729888]
[10]
Trebicka J, Gu W, de Ledinghen V, et al. Two-dimensional shear wave elastography predicts survival in advanced chronic liver disease. Gut 2022; 71(2): 402-14.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323419] [PMID: 33479052]
[11]
Ren LJ, Cheng CLK, Ma CZH, Zheng YP. Changes in muscle hardness from resting to mid-range lengthened positions detected by Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) with a novel protocol of ultrasound probe placement. Appl Sci 2021; 11(1): 452.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app11010452]
[12]
Alyami J, Almutairi FF, Aldoassary S, et al. Interobserver variability in ultrasound assessment of thyroid nodules. Medicine 2022; 101(41): e31106.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031106] [PMID: 36254067]
[13]
Sigrist RMS, Liau J, Kaffas AE, Chammas MC, Willmann JK. Ultrasound elastography: Review of techniques and clinical applications. Theranostics 2017; 7(5): 1303-29.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/thno.18650] [PMID: 28435467]
[14]
Parker KJ, Ormachea J, Hah Z. Group versus phase velocity of shear waves in soft tissues. Ultrason Imaging 2018; 40(6): 343-56.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0161734618796217] [PMID: 30182816]
[15]
Kawada N, Tanaka S, Uehara H, et al. Potential use of point shear wave elastography for the pancreas: A single center prospective study. Eur J Radiol 2014; 83(4): 620-4.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.11.029] [PMID: 24445135]
[16]
Pozzi R, Parzanese I, Baccarin A, et al. Point shear-wave elastography in chronic pancreatitis: A promising tool for staging disease severity. Pancreatology 2017; 17(6): 905-10.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2017.10.003] [PMID: 29066007]
[17]
Mateen MA, Muheet KA, Mohan RJ, et al. Evaluation of ultrasound based acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) and eSie touch sonoelastography for diagnosis of inflammatory pancreatic diseases. JOP 2012; 13(1): 36-44.
[PMID: 22233945]
[18]
Treiber M, Einwächter H, Phillip V, Wagenpfeil S, Schmid RM, Lersch C. Is the size of the pancreas useful in diagnosing chronic pancreatitis? An ultrasound based, retrospective study. Pancreatology 2016; 16(5): 819-23.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2016.07.012] [PMID: 27459912]
[19]
Yang J, Li J, Ye G, Luo Y. Comparison of visual transient elastography and shear wave elastography in evaluating liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease. Int J Gen Med 2021; 14: 3553-61.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S319101] [PMID: 34295181]
[20]
Hattapoğlu S, Göya C, Hamidi C, et al. Evaluation of parathyroid lesions with point shear wave elastography. J Ultrasound Med 2016; 35(10): 2179-82.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7863/ultra.15.10074] [PMID: 27573796]
[21]
Pfahler MHC, Kratzer W, Leichsenring M, et al. Point shear wave elastography of the pancreas in patients with cystic fibrosis: A comparison with healthy controls. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2018; 43(9): 2384-90.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1479-2] [PMID: 29460047]
[22]
D’Onofrio M, Crosara S, De Robertis R, Canestrini S, Demozzi E, Pozzi Mucelli R. Elastography of the pancreas. Eur J Radiol 2014; 83(3): 415-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.04.020] [PMID: 23726121]
[23]
Taş S, Korkusuz F, Erden Z. Neck muscle stiffness in participants with and without chronic neck pain: A shear-wave elastography study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2018; 41(7): 580-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2018.01.007] [PMID: 30442356]
[24]
Bernabei M, Lee SSM, Perreault EJ, Sandercock TG. Shear wave velocity is sensitive to changes in muscle stiffness that occur independently from changes in force. J Appl Physiol 2020; 128(1): 8-16.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00112.2019] [PMID: 31556833]
[25]
Leong SS, Wong JHD, Md Shah MN, et al. Shear wave elastography accurately detects chronic changes in renal histopathology. Nephrology 2021; 26(1): 38-45.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nep.13805] [PMID: 33058334]
[26]
Zaro R, Lupsor-Platon M, Cheviet A, Badea R. The pursuit of normal reference values of pancreas stiffness by using Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) elastography. Med Ultrason 2016; 18(4): 425-30.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.11152/mu-867] [PMID: 27981273]
[27]
Alzaid A, Aideyan O, Nawaz S. The size of the pancreas in diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med 1993; 10(8): 759-63.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.1993.tb00160.x] [PMID: 8261759]
[28]
Altobelli E, Blasetti A, Verrotti A, Di Giandomenico V, Bonomo L, Chiarelli F. Size of pancreas in children and adolescents with type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes. J Clin Ultrasound 1998; 26(8): 391-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0096(199810)26:8<391:AID-JCU3>3.0.CO;2-D] [PMID: 9783245]
[29]
Augustine P, Gent R, Louise J, et al. Pancreas size and exocrine function is decreased in young children with recent‐onset Type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med 2020; 37(8): 1340-3.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dme.13987] [PMID: 31094026]
[30]
Sasamori H, Fukui T, Hayashi T, et al. Analysis of pancreatic volume in acute-onset, slowly-progressive and fulminant type 1 diabetes in a Japanese population. J Diabetes Investig 2018; 9(5): 1091-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.12816] [PMID: 29427469]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy