Generic placeholder image

Current Medical Imaging

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4056
ISSN (Online): 1875-6603

Research Article

Reproducibility of Facial Information in Three-Dimensional Reconstructed Head Images: An Exploratory Study

Author(s): Tatsuya Uchida, Taichi Kin*, Katsuya Sato, Tsukasa Koike, Satoshi Kiyofuji, Yasuhiro Takeda, Ryoko Niwa, Toki Saito, Ikumi Takashima, Takuya Kawahara, Satoru Miyawaki, Hiroshi Oyama and Nobuhito Saito

Volume 19, Issue 12, 2023

Published on: 10 February, 2023

Article ID: e230123212997 Pages: 7

DOI: 10.2174/1573405619666230123105057

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: Facial information acquired via three-dimensional reconstruction of head computed tomography (CT) data may be considered personal information, which can be problematic for neuroimaging studies. However, no study has verified the relationship between slice thickness and face reproducibility. This study determined the relationship and match rate between image slice thickness and face detection accuracy of face-recognition software in facial reconstructed models.

Methods: Head CT data of 60 cases comprising entire faces obtained under conditions of non-contrast and 1-mm slice thickness were resampled to obtain 2-10-mm slice-thickness data. Facial models, reconstructed by image thresholding, were acquired from the data. We performed face detection tests per slice thickness on the models and calculated the face detection rate. The reconstructed facial models created from 1-mm slice-thickness data and other slice thicknesses were used as training and test data, respectively. Match confidence scores were obtained via three programs, match rates were calculated per slice thickness, and generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate the match rate trend.

Results: In general, the face detection rates for the 1-10-mm slice thicknesses were 100, 100, 98.3, 98.3, 95.0, 91.7, 86.7, 78.3, 68.3, and 61.7 %, respectively. The match rates for the 2-10-mm slice thicknesses were 100, 98.3, 98.3, 95.0, 85.0, 71.7, 53.3, 28.3, and 16.7 %, respectively.

Conclusion: The reconstructed models tended to have higher match rates as the slice thickness decreased. Thus, thin-slice head CT imaging data may increase the possibility of the information becoming personally identifiable health information.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
Vallance P, Chalmers I. Secure use of individual patient data from clinical trials. Lancet 2013; 382(9898): 1073-4.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62001-2] [PMID: 24075034]
[2]
Raghupathi W, Raghupathi V. Big data analytics in healthcare: Promise and potential. Health Inf Sci Syst 2014; 2(1): 3.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-2501-2-3] [PMID: 25825667]
[3]
Chen JJS, Juluru K, Morgan T, Moffitt R, Siddiqui KM, Siegel EL. Implications of surface-rendered facial CT images in patient privacy. Am J Roentgenol 2014; 202(6): 1267-71.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.10608] [PMID: 24848824]
[4]
Prior FW, Brunsden B, Hildebolt C, et al. Facial recognition from volume-rendered magnetic resonance imaging data. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2009; 13(1): 5-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TITB.2008.2003335] [PMID: 19129018]
[5]
Schwarz CG, Kremers WK, Therneau TM, et al. Identification of anonymous MRI research participants with face-recognition software. N Engl J Med 2019; 381(17): 1684-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1908881] [PMID: 31644852]
[6]
Jeong YU, Yoo S, Kim YH, Shim WH. De-identification of facial features in magnetic resonance images: Software development using deep learning technology. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22(12)e22739
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/22739] [PMID: 33208302]
[7]
Hirabayashi S, Umamoto N, Tachi M, Sugawara Y, Sakurai A, Harii K. Optimized 3-D CT scan protocol for longitudinal morphological estimation in craniofacial surgery. J Craniofac Surg 2001; 12(2): 136-40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001665-200103000-00009] [PMID: 11314623]
[8]
Kim KD, Ruprecht A, Wang G, Lee JB, Dawson DV, Vannier MW. Accuracy of facial soft tissue thickness measurements in personal computer-based multiplanar reconstructed computed tomographic images. Forensic Sci Int 2005; 155(1): 28-34.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.11.004] [PMID: 16216709]
[9]
Mazura JC, Juluru K, Chen JJ, Morgan TA, John M, Siegel EL. Facial recognition software success rates for the identification of 3D surface reconstructed facial images: Implications for patient privacy and security. J Digit Imaging 2012; 25(3): 347-51.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-011-9429-3] [PMID: 22065158]
[10]
Moraes T, Amorim P, Da Silva JV, Pedrini H. Medical image interpolation based on 3D Lanczos filtering. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng Imaging Vis 2020; 8(3): 294-300.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21681163.2019.1683469]
[11]
Milchenko M, Marcus D. Obscuring surface anatomy in volumetric imaging data. Neuroinformatics 2013; 11(1): 65-75.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12021-012-9160-3] [PMID: 22968671]
[12]
Meden B. Emeršič Ž, Štruc V, Peer P. K-Same-Net: k-Anonymity with generative deep neural networks for face deidentification. Entropy 2018; 20(1): 60.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e20010060] [PMID: 33265147]
[13]
Caldwell CB, Mah K, Ung YC, et al. Observer variation in contouring gross tumor volume in patients with poorly defined non-small-cell lung tumors on CT: The impact of 18 FDG-hybrid PET fusion. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001; 51(4): 923-31.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(01)01722-9] [PMID: 11704312]
[14]
Bellon MR, Siddiqui MS, Ryu S, Chetty IJ. The effect of longitudinal CT resolution and pixel size (FOV) on target delineation and treatment planning in stereotactic radiosurgery. J Radiosurg SBRT 2014; 3(2): 149-63.
[PMID: 29296396]
[15]
Huang K, Rhee DJ, Ger R, et al. Impact of slice thickness, pixel size, and CT dose on the performance of automatic contouring algorithms. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22(5): 168-74.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13207] [PMID: 33779037]
[16]
Jarudi IN, Sinha P. Relative contributions of internal and external features to face recognition. 2003. Available from: cbcl.mit.edu/publications/ai-publications/2003/AIM-2003-004.pdf
[17]
Thickman D, Wang G, White J, Cutter G. National variation of technical factors in computed tomography of the head. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2013; 37(4): 486-92.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0b013e31828ffe23] [PMID: 23863521]
[18]
Mafee MF, Tran BH, Chapa AR. Imaging of rhinosinusitis and its complications: Plain film, CT, and MRI. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2006; 30(3): 165-86.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1385/CRIAI:30:3:165] [PMID: 16785588]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy