Abstract
Background: Fear of childbirth (FOC) is considered one of the factors influencing the increase in elective cesarean section. The appropriate solution to reduce the FOC has not yet been identified.
Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of haptonomy intervention on FOC and maternal- fetal attachment (MFA) among primigravid women.
Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted on 68 primigravid women with a gestational age of 24-28 weeks who were referred to health centers in Tabriz, Iran, with a FOC score above 65. Participants were randomly assigned to the intervention and control groups. The intervention group (n=34) received haptonomy in 5 sessions, once a week for 45-60 minutes, and the control group received an information pamphlet about pain management options in labor and fetal development during pregnancy. The data were collected using Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaireversion A, Cranley’s MFA Scale, and Revised Pregnancy Related Anxiety Questionnaire, before the intervention and at a gestational age of 35-37 weeks. The data were analyzed using Chi-square, independent t-test, and ANCOVA.
Results: After intervention and controlling the effect of baseline score, the mean score of FOC in the intervention group was significantly lower than that in the control group [Adjusted mean difference (AMD): -23.67, 95% CI: - 28.12 to -19.23, p = 0.001]. Further, the mean score of MFA indicated a significant difference between the two groups [AMD: 10.12, 95% CI: 6.44 to 13.8, p <0.001].
Conclusion: The results of the present study revealed the effectiveness of the haptonomy intervention in reducing FOC and increasing MFA. Therefore, the use of haptonomy intervention is recommended among mothers with high and severe FOC and low MFA.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3532-x] [PMID: 25391637]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1659-7] [PMID: 29329526]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.15296/ijwhr.2022.02]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03790-w] [PMID: 33882872]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.15296/ijwhr.2021.44]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S193306] [PMID: 31114392]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2011.08.015] [PMID: 21955858]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020056] [PMID: 29866722]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216870] [PMID: 31091276]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31930-5] [PMID: 30322585]
[PMID: 34231203]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00198] [PMID: 32813435]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2020.05.008] [PMID: 32522443]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2017.1398230] [PMID: 29157055]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03388-1] [PMID: 35874964]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0962280219846146] [PMID: 31074333]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0226-4] [PMID: 27012940]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/01674829809048501] [PMID: 9638601]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v9n2p269]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198109000-00008] [PMID: 6912989]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0167482X.2014.944498] [PMID: 25093467]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2021.101352] [PMID: 33761431]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/birt.12136] [PMID: 25303111]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2019.1636943] [PMID: 31274007]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2018.1466385] [PMID: 29727202]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3782(14)50012-6] [PMID: 25220127]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2019.1695041] [PMID: 31795733]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_172_16] [PMID: 29296598]