Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

International Journal of Sensors, Wireless Communications and Control

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 2210-3279
ISSN (Online): 2210-3287

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Research Article

An Autonomous Adaptive Enhancement Method Based on Learning to Optimize Heterogeneous Network Selection

Author(s): Yadala Sucharitha* and Pundru Chandra Shaker Reddy

Volume 12, Issue 7, 2022

Published on: 03 November, 2022

Page: [495 - 509] Pages: 15

DOI: 10.2174/2210327912666221012154428

Price: $65

Abstract

Aims and Background: Mobile workstations are frequently used in challenging environments of heterogeneous networks. Users must move between various networks for a myriad of purposes, including vertical handover. At this time, it is critical for the mobile station to quickly pick the most appropriate networks from all identified alternative connections with the decision outcome, avoiding the ping-pong effect to the greatest extent feasible.

Objectives and Methodology: Based on a combination of network characteristics as well as user choice, this study offers a heterogeneous network selection method. This technique integrates three common Multi-Attribute Decision-Making (MADM) techniques, notably the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP), Entropy, and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), to take into consideration user preferences for every prospective network as well as the real scenario of heterogeneous networks. For different traffic classes, FAHP is first utilized to determine the weights of network parameters and the utility numbers of total options available. Next, entropies and TOPSIS are utilized to obtain only the unbiased weights of network factors and utility principles of totally different options.

Results: The most suitable networks, whose utility number is the greatest and larger than that of the equivalent number of present networks of the phone station, are chosen to provide accessibility based on the utility numbers of each prospective system as a limit. The suggested method not only eliminates a particular algorithm's one-sided character but also dynamically changes the percentage of each method in the desired outcome based on real needs.

Conclusion: The proposed model was compared to the three existing hybrid methods. The results showed that it could precisely choose the optimized network connectivity and significantly reduce the value of vertical handoffs. It also provides the requisite Quality of Service (QoS) and Quality of Everything (QoE) in terms of the quantitative benefits of vertical handovers.

Next »
Graphical Abstract

[1]
Hussain SM, Yusof KM, Asuncion R, Hussain SA. Artificial intelligence based handover decision and network selection in heterogeneous internet of vehicles. Indones J Electr Eng Comput Sci 2021; 22(2): 1124-34.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v22.i2.pp1124-1134]
[2]
Sujihelen L, Boddu R, Murugaveni S, et al. Node replication attack detection in distributed wireless sensor networks. Wirel Commun Mob Comput 2022; 2022: 1-11.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7252791]
[3]
Chen C, Huang YP, Lam WHK, et al. Data efficient reinforcement learning and adaptive optimal perimeter control of network traffic dynamics. Transp Res, Part C Emerg Technol 2022; 142: 103759.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2022.103759]
[4]
Anzum MS, Rafique M, Sarder AI, Tajrian F, Shams AB. Downlink Performance Enhancement of High-Velocity Users in 5G Networks by Configuring Antenna System. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/69834335/Downlink_Performance_Enhancement_of_High_Velocity_Users_in_5G_Networks_by_Con-figuring_Antenna_System
[5]
Reddy PCS, Yadala S, Goddumarri SN. Development of rainfall forecasting model using machine learning with singular spectrum analysis. IIUM Eng J 2022; 23(1): 172-86.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.31436/iiumej.v23i1.1822]
[6]
Freitas A. Survey on decision-making algorithms for network selection in heterogeneous architectures. In: Proceedings of Communication Technologies for Vehicles. November 16–17 2020; Vol. 12574: p. 89.
[7]
Li Y, Chang L, Li L, Bao X, Gu T. TASC-MADM: Task assignment in spatial crowdsourcing based on multiattribute decision-making. Secur Commun Netw 2021; 2021: 1-14.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5448397]
[8]
Shaker Reddy PC, Sureshbabu A. An enhanced multiple linear regression model for seasonal rainfall prediction. Int J Sensors Wirel Commun Control 2020; 10(4): 473-83.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/2210327910666191218124350]
[9]
Zolfani S, Yazdani M, Pamucar D, Zarate PA. VIKOR and TOPSIS focused reanalysis of the MADM methods based on logarithmic normalization. FACTA UNIVERSITATIS Series: Mechanical Engineering, University of NIS. 2020. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.08150
[10]
Munir M, Mahmood T, Hussain A. Algorithm for T-spherical fuzzy MADM based on associated immediate probability interactive geometric aggregation operators. Artif Intell Rev 2021; 54(8): 6033-61.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-09959-1]
[11]
Reddy PC, Nachiyappan S, Ramakrishna V, Senthil R, Sajid Anwer MD. Hybrid model using scrum methodology for software development system. J Nucl Ene Sci Power Generat Techno 10(9): 1-6.
[12]
Mahmoudi A, Javed SA, Liu S, Deng X. Distinguishing coefficient driven sensitivity analysis of GRA model for intelligent decisions: Application in project management. Technol Econ Dev Econ 2020; 26(3): 621-41.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/tede.2020.11890]
[13]
Liu Y, Eckert CM, Earl C. A review of fuzzy AHP methods for decision-making with subjective judgements. Expert Syst Appl 2020; 161113738.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113738]
[14]
Balamurugan D, Aravinth SS, Reddy PCS, Rupani A, Manikandan A. Multiview objects recognition using deep learning-based wrap-CNN with voting scheme. Neural Process Lett 2022; 54(3): 1495-521.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11063-021-10679-4]
[15]
Utomo EY, Udjiani T, Surarso B. Application of Fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for the new normal problem. J Phys: Conf Ser 1943; 012130.
[16]
Giordano D, Iavernaro F. Maximal‐entropy driven determination of weights in least‐square approximation. Math Methods Appl Sci 2021; 44(8): 6448-61.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mma.7197]
[17]
Ikram M, Zhang Q, Sroufe R. Developing integrated management systems using an AHP‐Fuzzy VIKOR approach. Bus Strategy Environ 2020; 29(6): 2265-83.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.2501]
[18]
Guler D, Yomralioglu T. Suitable location selection for the electric vehicle fast charging station with AHP and fuzzy AHP methods using GIS. Ann GIS 2020; 26(2): 169-89.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2020.1737226]
[19]
Shaker RPC, Yadala S. Iot enabled energy-efficient multipath power control for underwater sensor networks. Int J Sens Wirel Commun Control 2022; p. 12. [Epub ahead of print].
[20]
Ali SM, Burney SA, Khan SY. Fuzzy-AHP-TOPSIS: An integrated multi-criteria decision support system for supplier selection in Pakistan’s textile industry. IJCSNS 2020; 20(4): 91.
[21]
Gök-Kısa AC, Çelik P, Peker İ. Performance evaluation of privatized ports by entropy based TOPSIS and ARAS approach. Benchmarking (Bradf) 2022; 29(1): 118-35.
[22]
Sarkar B, Biswas A. Pythagorean fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS integrated approach for transportation management through a new distance measure. Soft Comput 2021; 25(5): 4073-89.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05433-2]
[23]
Tomasin S, Centenaro M, Seco-Granados G, Roth S, Sezgin A. Location-privacy leakage and integrated solutions for 5G cellular networks and beyond. Sensors (Basel) 2021; 21(15): 5176.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21155176] [PMID: 34372414]
[24]
Nyimbili PH, Erden T. A hybrid approach integrating entropy-AHP and GIS for suitability assessment of urban emergency facilities. ISPRS Int J Geoinf 2020; 9(7): 419.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9070419]
[25]
She L, Han S, Liu X. Application of quantum-like Bayesian network and belief entropy for interference effect in multi-attribute decision making problem. Comput Ind Eng 2021; 157107307.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107307]
[26]
Yalcin AS, Kilic HS, Delen D. The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in business analytics: A comprehensive literature review. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2022; 174121193.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121193]
[27]
Xu C, Ke Y, Li Y, Chu H, Wu Y. Data-driven configuration optimization of an off-grid wind/PV/hydrogen system based on modified NSGA-II and CRITIC-TOPSIS. Energy Convers Manage 2020; 215112892.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112892]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy