Abstract
Background: Several diagnostic methods were proposed and evaluated for the COVID-19 disease. However, published studies have reported different diagnostic values for these methods.
Aims: The present study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance and accuracy of CT in the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and developed and presented a Corona CT severity index.
Methods: In this retrospective study, CT diagnostic performance was measured based on sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy, and RT-PCR was regarded as a standard. Patients’ CT reports were evaluated by a radiologist, and scoring and calculating of the CT severity index were performed.
Results: Of 208 patients, 82 showed positive, and 126 showed negative RT-PCR results with a positive frequency of 39.4% (95% CI, 32.7-46.4). The chest CT scan related to 136 patients indicated COVID- 19, whereas the initial RT-PCR assays of 56 patients were negative. Considering RT-PCR results as the reference standard, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of chest CT to indicate COVID-19 infection were 100%, 55.6% (95% CI 46.4-64.4%), and 72.8% (95% CI 66.2-78.8%), respectively. The severity of pulmonary involvement was assigned with different grades. For 60.7% of patients with severity grades of 2 to 6, who showed the involvement of at least one lung lobe in CT, PCR retrieved negative results.
Conclusion: CT scan shows an acceptable sensitivity as well as a consistently better specificity to identify COVID-19 pneumonia than PCR. It may be considered a major method to identify COVID-19 in epidemic locations.
Keywords: COVID-19, Pneumonia, Diagnosis, Imaging, Lung computed tomography, Severity index, RT-PCR.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2020.198114] [PMID: 32800805]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2002032] [PMID: 32109013]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/all.14238] [PMID: 32077115]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200702] [PMID: 32142398]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200230] [PMID: 32017661]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200642] [PMID: 32101510]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200343] [PMID: 32049601]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200432] [PMID: 32073353]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020209021] [PMID: 33196374]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/dir.2020.20260] [PMID: 32352917]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06934-2] [PMID: 32415585]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06713-z] [PMID: 32025790]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045] [PMID: 31992387]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMe2001329] [PMID: 31986242]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2020.100061] [PMID: 33169119]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/ejbh.2020.010420] [PMID: 32285028]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00957-5] [PMID: 33512601]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/ryct.2020200110] [PMID: 33778566]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200330] [PMID: 32049600]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020201237] [PMID: 32243238]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/ryct.2020200092] [PMID: 33778564]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.04.003] [PMID: 32275978]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108961] [PMID: 32229322]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20542704211011837] [PMID: 34035931]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200463] [PMID: 32077789]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06013-x] [PMID: 33832444]