Generic placeholder image

Current Women`s Health Reviews

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4048
ISSN (Online): 1875-6581

Research Article

Gender Preference in Gynecology and Obstetrics (GPGO) Scale

Author(s): Said El Hage, Michael Daaboul, Georgio Sayde, Omar Ismail*, Youssef Jamaleddine, Souheil Hallit and Pascale Salameh

Volume 19, Issue 3, 2023

Published on: 10 August, 2022

Article ID: e080622205712 Pages: 10

DOI: 10.2174/1573404819666220608104811

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: Patients' preferences towards their physicians constitute a crucial part of providing patient-centered care. Gender preference of patients towards gynecologists/obstetricians is controversial.

Objective: The authors aimed to develop and validate a scale that specifically assesses the gender preferences of patients toward physicians in the obstetrics and gynecology field.

Materials and Methods: This epidemiological cross-sectional study was conducted on 1192 participants in Lebanon. The questionnaire used consisted of two parts; the first part was related to sociodemographic questions and obstetrics and gynecology specialists’ overview, and the second part was divided into males' and females' perceptions of gynecologists. The newly developed GPGO scale, consisting of 13 items, was only intended for females. Statistical analysis was performed to test the internal reliability, convergent validity, and construct validity. Overall, there were 1192 respondents, 890 females and 302 males. In this study, we only included females’ responses.

Results: Tests of assumptions of sample adequacy showed communalities higher than 0.3. Factor analysis of the 13 items in the GPGO scale revealed two main components. Items were adequately loaded into each component. The scale’s Cronbach alpha indicated internal reliability to be good (0.861); component 1 had acceptable internal reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.745), while component 2 had high internal reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.846). Pearson correlation coefficients were 0.877 (p<0.0001) and 0.898 (p<0.0001), respectively. Therefore, the scale showed adequate convergent validity.

Conclusion: The resulting GPGO scale, which assesses the preference of patients towards gynecologists and obstetricians, is validated for use in females aged 18 years old and higher. The scale can be used in future studies for comparison or prospective follow-up.

Keywords: Gynecologists, obstetricians, females, gender preference, scale, physicians.

[1]
Pineault, R.; Borgès Da Silva, R.; Provost, S.; Fournier, M.; Prud’homme, A.; Levesque, J.F. Do gender-predominant primary health care organizations have an impact on patient experience of care, use of services, and unmet needs? Inquiry, 2017, 54, 46958017709688.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0046958017709688] [PMID: 28578608]
[2]
Hall, J.A.; Irish, J.T.; Roter, D.L.; Ehrlich, C.M.; Miller, L.H. Gender in medical encounters: An analysis of physician and patient communication in a primary care setting. Health Psychol., 1994, 13(5), 384-392.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.13.5.384] [PMID: 7805632]
[3]
Bertakis, K.D.; Franks, P.; Azari, R. Effects of physician gender on patient satisfaction. J. Am. Med. Womens Assoc., 2003, 58(2), 69-75.
[4]
Plunkett, B.A.; Kohli, P.; Milad, M.P. The importance of physician gender in the selection of an obstetrician or a gynecologist. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2002, 186(5), 926-928.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mob.2002.123401] [PMID: 12015516]
[5]
Janssen, S.M.; Lagro-Janssen, A.L. Physician’s gender, communication style, patient preferences and patient satisfaction in gynecology and obstetrics: A systematic review. Patient Educ. Couns., 2012, 89(2), 221-226.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.034] [PMID: 22819711]
[6]
van Dulmen, A.M.; Bensing, J.M. Gender differences in gynecologist communication. Women Health, 2000, 30(3), 49-61.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J013v30n03_04] [PMID: 10943802]
[7]
Johnson, A.M.; Schnatz, P.F.; Kelsey, A.M.; Ohannessian, C.M. Do women prefer care from female or male obstetrician-gynecologists? A study of patient gender preference. J. Am. Osteopath. Assoc., 2005, 105(8), 369-379.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.2005.105.8.369] [PMID: 16166391]
[8]
Riaz, B.; Sherwani, N.Z.F.; Inam, S.H.A.; Rafiq, M.Y.; Tanveer, S.; Arif, A.; Abdullah, M.; Jamil, H. Physician gender preference amongst females attending obstetrics/gynecology clinics. Cureus, 2021, 13(5), e15028.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.15028] [PMID: 34136321]
[9]
Tobler, K.J.; Wu, J.; Khafagy, A.M.; Pier, B.D.; Torrealday, S.; Londra, L. Gender preference of the obstetrician gynecologist provider. Obstet. Gynecol., 2016, 127, 43S.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000483829.97196.8f]
[10]
Wessels, H.; de Graeff, A.; Wynia, K.; Sixma, H.J.; de Heus, M.; Schipper, M.; Woltjer, G.T.; Teunissen, S.C.; Voest, E.E. Medical oncology patients’ preferences with regard to health care: Development of a patient-driven questionnaire. Ann. Oncol., 2009, 20(10), 1708-1713.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdp044] [PMID: 19497943]
[11]
Hojat, M.; Gonnella, J.S.; Nasca, T.J.; Mangione, S.; Veloksi, J.J.; Magee, M. The Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy: Further psychometric data and differences by gender and specialty at item level. Acad. Med., 2002, 77(10)(Suppl.), S58-S60.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200210001-00019] [PMID: 12377706]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy