FMEA Method Using Spherical Fuzzy Sets for Risk Analysis of the Tech
Startup

Fatma      Yoşlı; Gül   Tekin   Temur; Bersam      Bolat

doi:10.2174/2666294901666220510102203

Abstract

Introduction: Tech startups are fast-growing businesses that target the demands of the marketplace by developing innovative products, services, or platforms. Startups ensure socially, economically, or environmentally more effective alternatives by using or by creating appropriate technologies. Many factors have become prominent regarding the success and sustainability of the product or service offered by the startup: investment, experience, and education of the team, the leadership of the management, creativity, innovation, technological breakthroughs, surrounding community, future perspective, target marketing strategy, location and the analysis of the market, etc. But since 80% of startups do not survive after five years, defining the important risk factors is crucial to develop the right strategies for successful startups. In this study, the risk factors have been defined based on the business model, which has an important place in the success of the technology startups, which use technology intensively. Comprehensive risk analysis on identified factors is presented to identify effective managerial strategies for technology startups to not fail.

Methods: Spherical Fuzzy Failure Mode and Impact Analysis (SFFMEA) was used within the framework of a business model canvas for risk analysis for the failure of technology startup projects. Due to the lack of recorded data for analysis, the opinions of field experts were used. While the business model canvas guided the identification of detailed risk factors, FMEA enabled the risk analysis of factors that cause startup projects to fail, and considering parameters related to the probability of the relevant risk factors, their impact on the failure of the project, and the detection level of the risk factor. Spherical Fuzzy, on the other hand, allowed the quantitative inference of FMEA's comprehensive parameter definitions associated with the risk factors through experts. Thus, all risk factors that may cause the failure of tech startups were ranked according to their risk priority numbers (RPNs), with the SFFMEA analysis, which offers a comprehensive risk analysis.

Results: The findings show that the most important causes of the tech startup’s failure are “noncompliance with existing restrictions”, “inappropriate venture capital strategy”, and “lack of clustering support”.

Conclusion: These failure modes can be interpreted according to their frequency of encounter, potential effects, and detectability, and can be considered an important finding in the development of appropriate managerial strategies for the mitigation of the risk factors so the startups can survive in their first five years. Also, with the proposed risk analysis methodology, a comprehensive analysis of any startup project can be performed according to its conditions and characteristics.

Keywords: Technological startups, business model canvas, fuzzy sets, failure mode effect analysis, spherical fuzzy sets, risk priority number.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
L. Mikle, "Startups and reasons for their failure", SHS Web of Conferences, EDP Sciences, p. vol. Vol. 83, 2020p. 01046, .
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20208301046]
[2]
H. Zaheer, Y. Breyer, J. Dumay,  and M. Enjeti, "Straight from the horse’s mouth: Founders’ perspectives on achieving ‘traction’in digital start-ups", Comput. Human Behav., vol. 95, pp. 262-274, 2019.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.002]
[3]
K. Buffardi, C. Robb,  and D. Rahn, "Learning agile with tech startup software engineering projects", In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 2017, pp. 28-33 
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3059009.3059063]
[4]
J. Santisteban,  and D. Mauricio, "Systematic literature review of critical success factors of information technology startups", Acad. Entrepr. J., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 1-23, 2017.
[5]
M.H. AlHazza, I.F. Bourini, M. Zubaidah,  and N.B. Selamat, "Success factor in new product development for startup companies using fuzzy logic approach", 2019 International Conference on Electrical and Computing Technologies and Applications (ICECTA), pp. 1-5, 2019.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICECTA48151.2019.8959574]
[6]
I. Jesemann, T. Beichter, K. Herburger, C. Constantinescu,  and M. Rüger, "Migration of the lean-startup approach from high-tech startups towards product design in large manufacturing companies", Procedia CIRP, vol. 91, pp. 594-599, 2020.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.03.110]
[7]
S. Kopera, E. Wszendybył-Skulska, J. Cebulak,  and S. Grabowski, "Interdisciplinarity in tech startups development: Case study of “unistartapp” project", Foundations of Management, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 23-32, 2018.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/fman-2018-0003]
[8]
A. Osterwalder,  and Y. Pigneur, Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers., John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, 2010.
[9]
J. Yagnik, Growth challenges of high-tech start-ups., vol. 46. ASCI J. Manag, 2017.
[10]
E. Hormiga, R.M. Batista-Canino,  and A. Sánchez-Medina, "The role of intellectual capital in the success of new ventures", Int. Entrep. Manage. J., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 71-92, 2011.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11365-010-0139-y]
[11]
M. Cantamessa, V. Gatteschi, G. Perboli,  and M. Rosano, "Startups’ roads to failure", Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 23-46, 2018.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su10072346]
[12]
X. Wang, H. Edison, S.S. Bajwa, C. Giardino,  and P. Abrahamsson, "Key challenges in software startups across life cycle stages. International Conference on Agile Software Development, vol. 251.  Springer Cham, 2016.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33515-5_14]
[13]
W.Y. Chung, Y. Jo,  and D. Lee, "Where should ICT startup companies be established? Efficiency comparison between cluster types", Telemat. Inform., p. vol. 56, pp. 101482, 2021, .
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101482]
[14]
N.M.C.F. Dias, "Failure factors of technological driven start-ups: ", Datris
solutions case study, Master Thesis in International Business, 2018.
[15]
I. Sanz-Prieto, "L. de-la-fuente-Valentín, and S. Ríos-Aguilar, “Technical due diligence as a methodology for assessing risks in start-up ecosystems: An advanced approach”", Inf. Process. Manage., p. vol. 58,
no. 5, pp. 102617, 2021, .
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102617]
[16]
M. Akhavan, M.V. Sebt,  and M. Ameli, "Risk assessment modeling for knowledge based and startup projects based on feasibility studies: A Bayesian network approach", Knowl. Base. Syst., p. vol. 222, pp. 106992, 2021, .
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2021.106992]
[17]
P.M.F. Teberga,  and F.L. Oliva, "Identification, analysis and treatment of risks in the introduction of new technologies by start-ups", Benchmarking, vol. 25, no. 5, 2018.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-06-2017-0156]
[18]
A. Sreenivasan,  and M. Suresh, "Modeling the enablers of sourcing risks faced by startups in COVID-19 era", J. Glob. Oper. Strateg. Sourc, vol. 15, no. 2, 2021.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JGOSS-12-2020-0070]
[19]
M.H.G. Couto, F.L. Oliva, M. Del Giudice, M. Kotabe, T. Chin,  and P. Kelle, "Life cycle analysis of Brazilian startups: Characteristics, intellectual capital, agents and associated risks", J. Intellect. Cap., 2021.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JIC-01-2021-0005]
[20]
P.M.F. Teberga, F.L. Oliva,  and M. Kotabe, "Risk analysis in introduction of new technologies by start-ups in the Brazilian market", Manage. Decis., vol. 56, no. 1, 2018.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2017-0337]
[21]
A. Saputra, R. Indradewa, T.Y.R. Syah,  and D. Fajarwati, "Risk management application for business startups ‘Jamu Partnership’ in Indonesia", Int. J. Res. Review, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 148-155, 2021.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20210821]
[22]
Y.A.B. Nordal, "A simple scenario-based qualitative model for assessing start-up risks"", In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Finance, Economics, Management and IT Business - FEMIB, pp. 98-105, 2020.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0009389500980105]
[23]
V. Polishchuk, M. Kelemen, B. Gavurová, C. Varotsos, R. Andoga, M. Gera, J. Christodoulakis, R. Soušek, J. Kozuba, J. Hospodka, P. Blišťan,  and S. Szabo Jr, "A fuzzy model of risk assessment for environmental start-up projects in the air transport sector", Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 16, no. 19, p. 3573, 2019.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193573] [PMID:  31554315]
[24]
J.R. Saura, P. Palos-Sanchez,  and A. Grilo, "Detecting indicators for startup business success: Sentiment analysis using text data mining", Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 917, 2019.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11030917]
[25]
M. Giannakis,  and T. Papadopoulos, "Supply chain sustainability: A risk management approach", Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 171, pp. 455-470, 2016.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.06.032]
[26]
S.K. Sharma, "Risk adjusted total cost of ownership model for strategic sourcing decisions", Int. J. Procurement Manag., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 123-145, 2016.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJPM.2016.075260]
[27]
E. Zarei, A. Azadeh, N. Khakzad, M.M. Aliabadi,  and I. Mohammadfam, "Dynamic safety assessment of natural gas stations using Bayesian network", J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 321, pp. 830-840, 2017.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.09.074] [PMID:  27720467]
[28]
L.A. Zadeh, "The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-III", Inf. Sci., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 43-80, 1975.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0020-0255(75)90017-1]
[29]
G. Bojadziev,  and M. Bojadziev, "Fuzzy logic for business, finance, and management., Advances in Fuzzy Systems - Applications and Theory. 2nd Edition. Vol. 23,", 
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/6451]
[30]
A. Singh, A.J. Patil, R.K. Sharma,  and R. Jarial, "An innovative fuzzy
modeling technique for transformer’s failure modes and effects analysis", In 2020 International Conference on Electrical and Electronics
Engineering (ICE3), 2020 IEEE, 2020.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICE348803.2020.9122822]
[31]
E. Akyuz, I. Akgun,  and M. Celik, "A fuzzy failure mode and effects approach to analyse concentrated inspection campaigns on board ships", Marit. Policy Manage., vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 887-908, 2016.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2016.1173737]
[32]
M. Ahmadi, K. Behzadian, A. Ardeshir,  and Z. Kapelan, "Comprehensive risk management using fuzzy FMEA and MCDA techniques in highway construction project", J. Civ. Eng. Manag., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 300-310, 2017.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2015.1068847]
[33]
F. Kutlu Gündoğdu,  and C. Kahraman, "A novel spherical fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and its renewable energy application", Soft Comput., vol. 24, pp. 4607-4621, 2019.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04222-w]
[34]
D. Yildiz, G.T. Temur, A. Beskese,  and T. Bozbura, "A spherical fuzzy analytic hierarchy process-based approach to prioritize career management activities improving employee retention", J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 6603-6618, 2020.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-189122]
[35]
M. Gul,  and M.F. Ak, "A modified failure modes and effects analysis using interval-valued spherical fuzzy extension of TOPSIS method: Case study in a marble manufacturing facility", Soft Comput., vol. 25, pp. 6157-6178, 2021.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-05605-8]
[36]
X. Zhou, H. Tian, L.Y. Wang,  and Z.Y. Haiji, "Time‐varying FMEA method based on interval‐valued spherical fuzzy theory", Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int., vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 3713-3729, 2021.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qre.2943]
[37]
E. Haktanir,  and C. Kahraman, A Literature Review on Fuzzy FMEA and an Application on Infant Car Seat Design Using Spherical Fuzzy Sets. Customer Oriented Product Design., Springer: Cham, Switzerland, pp. 429-449 2020.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42188-5_22]
[38]
T. Ladd, "Does the business model canvas drive venture success?", J. Res. Marketing Entrepreneurship, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 57-69, 2018.
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JRME-11-2016-0046]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite

Article Metrics

1

DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/2666294901666220510102203	Print ISSN 2666-2949
Publisher Name Bentham Science Publisher	Online ISSN 2666-2957

Journal of Fuzzy Logic and Modeling in Engineering

FMEA Method Using Spherical Fuzzy Sets for Risk Analysis of the Tech Startup

Abstract Play Pause

Graphical Abstract

Related Journals

Related Books

Abstract