Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Current Alternative Energy

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 2405-4631
ISSN (Online): 2405-464X

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Research Article

Situational and Trans-Situational Correlates of Public Energy Literacy: A Western U.S. Case Study

Author(s): Muhammad Usman Amin Siddiqi, Brent S. Steel* and Erika Allen Wolters

Volume 5, Issue 1, 2022

Published on: 27 April, 2022

Article ID: e090322201965 Pages: 16

DOI: 10.2174/2405463105666220309142802

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: Recent push for ‘energy democracy’ necessitates a well-informed citizenry vis-à-vis energy policy, especially in the wake of ideologically charged and divergent views about the existence and severity of climate change among American citizens. Citizens’ involvement in energy policy processes in democratic countries makes it important to assess the depth and scope of energy policy awareness and knowledge among the public, as well as to consider the factors that promote or hinder how informed people are about energy policy issues.

Objectives: This study aims at examining the levels of public informedness and knowledge of energy policy and analyzing their potential correlates in the western U.S. states of California, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington. The study also analyzes the impact of public awareness and knowledge on public support for government funding for renewable energy technology research.

Methods: Using survey data of 1804 randomly selected respondents from California, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington, the study employs ordinal logistic regression to trans-situational and situational models predicting self-assessed informedness and objective measure of knowledge about energy policy as well as public support for federal funding for renewable energy technology research.

Results: The study found that variables related to socio-economic status (SES) are stronger predictors of public informedness and knowledge about energy policy than situational variables like values and efficacy, except for climate change beliefs that have a positive relationship with informedness and knowledge.

Conclusion: The study also found that informedness and knowledge of energy policy are positively associated with support for government funding for renewable energy research.

Keywords: Energy democracy, energy literacy, energy policy, policy support, renewable energy technology, socio-economic status (SES).

[1]
Hmiel, B.; Petrenko, V.V.; Dyonisius, M.N.; Buizert, C.; Smith, A.M.; Place, P.F.; Harth, C.; Beaudette, R.; Hua, Q.; Yang, B.; Vimont, I.; Michel, S.E.; Severinghaus, J.P.; Etheridge, D.; Bromley, T.; Schmitt, J.; Faïn, X.; Weiss, R.F.; Dlugokencky, E. Preindustrial 14CH4 indicates greater anthropogenic fossil CH4 emissions. Nature, 2020, 578(7795), 409-412.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-1991-8] [PMID: 32076219]
[2]
Tyson, A.; Kennedy, B. Two-thirds of americans think government should do more on climate. pew research center science & society, Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2020/06/23/two-thirds-of-americans-think-government-should-do-more-on-climate/ (Accessed: Oct. 12, 2021).
[3]
Erikson, R.S.; Wright, G.; McIver, J.P. Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States; Cambridge University Press: New York, 1993.
[4]
Jones, B.D. Politics and the Architecture of Choice: Bounded Rationality and Governance; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, 2001.
[5]
Ostrom, E.; Cox, M.; Schlager, E. An Assessment of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework and Introduction of the Social-Ecological System Framework. In: Theories of the Policy Process; Sabatier, P.A., Ed.; Westview Press: Boulder, CO, 2014; pp. 267-306.
[6]
Simon, H. Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations; Macmillan: New York, 1947.
[7]
Simon, H. Models of Man; Wiley: New York, 1957.
[8]
Simon, H. Theories of Bounded Rationality. In: Decision and Organization: A Volume in Honor of Jacob Marschak; McGuire, C.B.; Radner, R.; Arrow, K.J., Eds.; North Holland: Amsterdam, 1972; pp. 161-176.
[9]
Hmelo-Silver, C.E. Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educ. Psychol. Rev., 2004, 16(3), 235-266.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3]
[10]
Ostrom, V. A Fallabilist’s Approach to Norms and Criteria of Choice. In: Guidance, Control, and Evaluation in the Public Sector; Kaufmann, F-X.; Majone, G.; Ostrom, V., Eds.; Walter de Gruyter: Berlin, 1986; pp. 229-244.
[11]
V. Ostrom, The Intellectual Crisis in American Public Administration; University of Alabama Press: Tuscaloosa, 2008.
[12]
Ostrom, E. Understanding Institutional Diversity; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, 2005.
[13]
Bernell, D.; Simon, C.A. The Energy Security Dilemma: US Policy and Practice; Routledge: New York, 2016.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203817797]
[14]
Welton, S. Grasping for energy democracy. Mich. Law Rev., 2018, 116(4), 581-644.
[15]
Farrell, J. Beyond utility 2.0 to energy democracy; Institute for Local Self-Reliance: Washington, DC, 2014. Available from: https://ilsr.org/report-energy-democracy/ (Accessed: Aug. 25, 2021).
[16]
Tomain, J.P. The democratization of energy. Vanderbilt J. Transnatl. Law, 2015, 48(4), 1125-1145.
[17]
Weinrub, A.; Giancatarino, A. Toward a climate justice energy platform: Democratizing our energy future Local Clean Energy Alliance with Centre for Social Inclusion, 2015. Available from: http://www.localcleanenergy.org/files/Climate%20Justice%20Energy%20Platform.pdf (Accessed: Aug. 25, 2021).
[18]
Roser-Renouf, C.; Maibach, E.; Leiserowitz, A.; Rosenthal, S. Global warming’s six americas and the election, 2016 Yale Program on Climate Change Communication, 2016. Available from: https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/six-americas-2016-election/ (Accessed: Aug. 26, 2021).
[19]
Kahan, D.M.; Jenkins-Smith, H.; Tarantola, T.; Silva, C.L.; Braman, D. Geoengineering and climate change polarization: Testing a two-channel model of science communication. Ann. Am. Acad. Pol. Soc. Sci., 2015, 658(1), 192-222.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002716214559002]
[20]
Fishkin, J.S.; Luskin, R.C.; Jowell, R. Deliberative polling and public consultation. Parliam. Aff., 2000, 53(4), 657-666.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pa/53.4.657]
[21]
Wang, R.; Fishkin, J.S.; Luskin, R.C. Does deliberation increase public‐spiritedness? Soc. Sci. Q., 2020, 101(6), 2163-2182.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12863]
[22]
Luskin, R.C.; Crow, D.B.; Fishkin, J.S.; Guild, W.; Thomas, D. Report on the deliberative poll on ‘vermont’s energy future Center for Deliberative Opinion Research, 2008. Available from: http://cdd.stanford.edu/2008/final-report-deliberative-polling-on-vermonts-energy-future/ (Accessed: Aug. 26, 2021).
[23]
Center for deliberative democracy, “final report: europolisdeliberative polling on the european union Available from: https://cdd.stanford.edu/2009/final-report-europolis-deliberative-polling-on-the-european-union/ (Accessed: Aug. 26, 2021).
[24]
Guild, W.; Lehr, R.; Thomas, D. Nova scotia power customer energy forum public decision partnership, Available from: https://cdd.stanford.edu/2004/results-of-the-nova-scotia-power-customer-energy-forum/ (Accessed: Aug. 26, 2021).
[25]
Sone, Y. Results of deliberative polling energy and environmental policy options in Japan, Available from: https://cdd.stanford.edu/2012/results-of-deliberative-polling-energy-and-environmental-policy-options-in-japan/ (Accessed: Aug. 26, 2021).
[26]
Delli Carpini, M.X.; Keeter, S. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters; Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, 1996.
[27]
Lupia, A.; McCubbins, M.D. The Democratic Dilema: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know?; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1998.
[28]
Pierce, J.C.; Steel, B.S. Prospects for Alternative Energy Development in the U.S. West: Tilting at Windmills? vol; Springer Berlin Heidelberg: New York, NY, 2017, 4, .
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53414-5]
[29]
Einsiedel, E.F. Understanding ‘publics’ in the public understanding of science In: M. Dierkes, and von C. Grote, Eds., Between understanding and trust: The public, science and technology. Harwood Academic Publishers: Amsterdam, 2000, pp. 205-216.
[30]
Hansen, J.; Holm, L.; Frewer, L.; Robinson, P.; Sandøe, P. Beyond the knowledge deficit: Recent research into lay and expert attitudes to food risks. Appetite, 2003, 41(2), 111-121.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6663(03)00079-5] [PMID: 14550309]
[31]
Wynne, B.; Irwin, A. Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1996.
[32]
Stoutenborough, J.W.; Sturgess, S.G.; Vedlitz, A. Knowledge, risk, and policy support: Public perceptions of nuclear power. Energy Policy, 2013, 62(11), 176-184.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.098]
[33]
Stoutenborough, J.W.; Vedlitz, A. The effect of perceived and assessed knowledge of climate change on public policy concerns: An empirical comparison. Environ. Sci. Policy, 2014, 37, 23-33.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.08.002]
[34]
Baumgartner, F.R.; Jones, B.D.; Mortensen, P.B. Punctuated Equilibrium Theory: Explaining Stability and Change in Public Policymaking. In: Theories of the Policy Process; Sabatier, P.A., Ed.; Westview Press: Boulder, CO, 2017; pp. 55-101.
[35]
Herweg, N.; Zahariadis, N.; Zohlnhofer, R. The Multiple Streams Framework: Foundations, Refinements, and Empirical Applications. In: Theories of the Policy Process; Sabatier, P.A., Ed.; Westview Press: Boulder, CO, 2017; pp. 17-53.
[36]
Jankins-Smith, H.C.; Nohrstedt, D.; Weible, C.M.; Ingold, K. The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An overview of Research Program. In: Theories of the Policy Process; Sabatier, P.A., Ed.; Westview Press: Boulder, CO, 2017; pp. 135-171.
[37]
Shanahan, E.A.; Jones, M.D.; Mcbeth, M.K.; Radaelli, C.M. The Narrative Policy Framework. In: Theories of the Policy Process; Sabatier, P.A., Ed.; Westview Press: Boulder, CO, 2017; pp. 173-213.
[38]
Janicke, M. The Political System’s Capacity For Environmental Policy. In: National Environmental Policies: A Comparative Study Of Capacity-Building; Janicke, M.; Weidner, H., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, 1997.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60507-9_1]
[39]
J.C. Pierce, N. Lovrich, T. Tsurutani, and T. Abe, Public Knowledge And Environmental Politics. In: Japan And The United States; Westview Press: Boulder, CO, 1989.
[40]
Pierce, J.C.; Steger, M.A.; Steel, B.S.; Lovrich, N. Citizens, Political Communication, And Interest Groups; Praeger Publishers: Westport, 1992.
[41]
Genova, B.K.L.; Greenberg, B.S. Interests in news and the knowledge gap. Public Opin. Q., 1979, 43(1), 79.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/268493]
[42]
Tichenor, P.J.; Donohue, G.A.; Olien, C.N. Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opin. Q., 1970, 34(2), 159-170.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/267786]
[43]
Karytsas, S.; Theodoropoulou, H. Socioeconomic and demographic factors that influence publics’ awareness on the different forms of renewable energy sources. Renew. Energy, 2014, 71, 480-485.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.05.059]
[44]
Lee, L-S.; Lee, Y-F.; Altschuld, J.W.; Pan, Y-J. Energy literacy: Evaluating knowledge, affect, and behavior of students in Taiwan. Energy Policy, 2015, 76, 98-106.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.11.012]
[45]
Martins, A.; Madaleno, M.; Ferreira Dias, M. Financial knowledge’s role in Portuguese energy literacy. Energies, 2020, 13(13), 3412.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en13133412]
[46]
Pierce, J.C.; Lovrich, N.; Steel, B.S.; Steger, M.A.; Tennert, J. Political Culture And Public Policy. In: Canada And The United States: Only A Border Apart?; Edwin Mellen Publishers: New York, NY, 2000.
[47]
Vassileva, I.; Campillo, J. Increasing energy efficiency in low-income households through targeting awareness and behavioral change. Renew. Energy, 2014, 67, 59-63.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.11.046]
[48]
Pierce, J.C.; Steel, B.S.; Warner, R.L. Knowledge, culture, and public support for renewable-energy policy. Comp. Technol. Transf. Soc., 2009, 7(3), 270-286.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/ctt.0.0047]
[49]
Assali, A.; Khatib, T.; Najjar, A. Renewable energy awareness among future generation of Palestine. Renew. Energy, 2019, 136, 254-263.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.01.007]
[50]
Karatepe, Y.; Neşe, S.V. A. Keçebaş, and M. Yumurtacı, "The levels of awareness about the renewable energy sources of university students in Turkey", Renew. Energy, 2012, 44, 174-179.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.01.099]
[51]
Steel, B.S.; Soden, D.; Warner, R.L. The impact of knowledge and values on perceptions of environmental risk to the Great Lakes. Soc. Nat. Resour., 1990, 3(4), 331-348.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941929009380730]
[52]
Jamieson, K.H. Everything You Think You Know About Politics… And Why You’re Wrong; Basic Books: New York, NY, 2000.
[53]
McGowan, F.; Sauter, R. Public Opinion on Energy Research: A Desk Study for the Research Councils; The Freeman Centre, University of Sussex: Brighton, 2005.
[54]
Steel, B.S.; Smith, C.; Opsommer, L.; Curiel, S.; Warner-Steel, R. Public ocean literacy in the United States. Ocean Coast. Manage., 2005, 48(2), 97-114.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2005.01.002]
[55]
Ettema, J.S.; Kline, F.G. Deficits, differences and ceilings: Contingent conditions for understanding the knowledge gap. Communic. Res., 1977, 4(2), 179-202.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/009365027700400204]
[56]
Steel, B.S.; Lach, D.; Satyal, V.A. Ideology and scientific credibility: Environmental policy in the American Pacific Northwest. Public Underst. Sci., 2006, 15(4), 481-495.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963662506059261]
[57]
Abrahamse, W.; Steg, L.; Vlek, C.; Rothengatter, T. The effect of tailored information, goal setting, and tailored feedback on household energy use, energy-related behaviors, and behavioral antecedents. J. Environ. Psychol., 2007, 27(4), 265-276.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.08.002]
[58]
Carmi, N.; Arnon, S.; Orion, N. Transforming environmental knowledge into behavior: The mediating role of environmental emotions. J. Environ. Educ., 2015, 46(3), 183-201.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2015.1028517]
[59]
Echegaray, F.; Hansstein, F.V. Assessing the intention-behavior gap in electronic waste recycling: The case of Brazil. J. Clean. Prod., 2017, 142, 180-190.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.064]
[60]
Gadenne, D.; Sharma, B.; Kerr, D.; Smith, T. The influence of consumers’ environmental beliefs and attitudes on energy saving behaviours. Energy Policy, 2011, 39(12), 7684-7694.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.002]
[61]
Gram-Hanssen, K.; Bartiaux, F.; Jensen, O.M.; Cantaert, M. Do homeowners use energy labels? A comparison between Denmark and Belgium. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(5), 2879-2888.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.10.017]
[62]
Mills, B.; Schleich, J. Residential energy-efficient technology adoption, energy conservation, knowledge, and attitudes: An analysis of European countries. Energy Policy, 2012, 49, 616-628.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.07.008]
[63]
Pothitou, M.; Hanna, R.F.; Chalvatzis, K.J. Environmental knowledge, pro-environmental behaviour and energy savings in households: An empirical study. Appl. Energy, 2016, 184, 1217-1229.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.017]
[64]
Pothitou, M.; Varga, L.; Kolios, A.J.; Gu, S. Linking energy behaviour, attitude and habits with environmental predisposition and knowledge. Int. J. Sustain. Energy, 2017, 36(4), 398-414.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2015.1032290]
[65]
Welsch, H.; Kühling, J. Pro-environmental behavior and rational consumer choice: Evidence from surveys of life satisfaction. J. Econ. Psychol., 2010, 31(3), 405-420.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2010.01.009]
[66]
Lee, L-S.; Lee, Y-F.; Wu, M-J.; Pan, Y-J. A study of energy literacy among nursing students to examine implications on energy conservation efforts in Taiwan. Energy Policy, 2019, 135, 111005.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111005]
[67]
Malka, A.; Krosnick, J.A.; Langer, G. The association of knowledge with concern about global warming: Trusted information sources shape public thinking. Risk Anal., 2009, 29(5), 633-647.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01220.x] [PMID: 19302280]
[68]
Karlstrøm, H.; Ryghaug, M. Public attitudes towards renewable energy technologies in Norway. The role of party preferences. Energy Policy, 2014, 67, 656-663.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.049]
[69]
Akerlof, K.; Winch, P.; Parket, C. Public Knowledge, Behaviors, and Preferences About Energy: A Maryland Statewide Survey, Fall 2015; Center for Climate Change Communication, George Mason University: Fairfax, 2015.
[70]
Dillman, D.A. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 2nd ed; John Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ, 2007.
[71]
Messer, B.L.; Edwards, M.L.; Dillman, D.A. Determinants of item nonresponse to web and mail respondents in three address-based mixed-mode surveys of the general public. Surv. Pract., 2012, 5(2), 1-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.29115/SP-2012-0012]
[72]
Portney, K.E.; Hannibal, B.; Goldsmith, C.; McGee, P.; Liu, X.; Vedlitz, A. Awareness of the food-energy-water nexus and public policy support in the United States: Public attitudes among the American people. Environ. Behav., 2018, 50(4), 375-400.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916517706531]
[73]
Caldwell, N. 12 states where fracking is most prevalent, Available from: https://stacker.com/stories/19086/12-states-where-fracking-most-prevalent (Accessed: Oct. 12, 2021).
[74]
Ribeiro, F.; Ferreira, P.; Araújo, M.; Braga, A.C. Modelling perception and attitudes towards renewable energy technologies. Renew. Energy, 2018, 122, 688-697.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.01.104]
[75]
Siddiqi, M.U.A.; Butt, D.K.M. Social structural and individual psychological determinants of political trust in Pakistan. J. Polit. Sci., 2019, 37, 31-50.
[76]
Chapman, A.; Shigetomi, Y.; Karmaker, S.C.; Saha, B.B.; Huff, K.; Brooks, C.; Stubbins, J. The cultural dynamics of energy: The impact of lived experience, preference and demographics on future energy policy in the United States. Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 2021, 80, 102231.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102231]
[77]
Imbulana Arachchi, J.; Managi, S. Preferences for energy sustainability: Different effects of gender on knowledge and importance. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2021, 141, 110767.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110767]
[78]
Lewis-Beck, M.S.; Skalaban, A. The R-squared: Some straight talk. Polit. Anal., 1990, 2, 153-170.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pan/2.1.153]
[79]
Dahl, R. Controlling Nuclear Weapons: Democracy versus Guardianship; Syracuse University Press: Syracuse, NY, 1985.
[80]
J.C. Pierce, and N. Lovrich, Water Resources, Democracy and the Technical Information Quandary; Associated Faculty Press: Port Washington, NY, 1986.
[81]
Hansen, J. Storms of My Grandchildren: The Truth About the Coming Climate Catastrophe and Out Last Chance to Save Humanity; Bloomsbury: London, UK, 2009.
[82]
Jamieson, D. Reason in a Dark Time: Why the Struggle Against Climate Change Failed-and What It Means for Our Future; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, 2014.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199337668.001.0001]
[83]
Stehr, N. Exceptional circumstances: Does climate change trump democracy? Issues Sci. Technol., 2016, 32(2), 37-44.
[84]
Smith, E. Energy, The Environment, And Public Opinion; Rowman and LittleVeld: Oxford, 2002.
[85]
Bolsen, T.; Cook, F.L. The polls-trends: Public opinion on energy policy: 1974-2006. Public Opin. Q., 2008, 72(2), 364-388.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfn019]
[86]
Delshad, A.B.; Raymond, L.; Sawicki, V.; Wegener, D.T. Public attitudes toward political and technological options for biofuels. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(7), 3414-3425.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.02.015]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
Article Metrics
4
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy