Abstract
Objective: This study investigates the association of the liver and spleen signal intensity on MRI with anemia in patients with gynecologic cancer.
Methods: 332 patients with gynecological cancer and 78 healthy women underwent MRI examination. Liver and spleen MRI parameters and laboratory tests were obtained within 1 week. The signal intensity ratios of liver and spleen to the paraspinal muscle were calculated on gradient-echo T1-weighted images (T1WI) and T2-weighted images (T2WI) in both patients and healthy women, respectively.
Results: The ratios of liver and spleen to paraspinal muscle on T1WI and T2WI were lower in patients than in the healthy women, respectively (P<0.0001). The ratios of the liver and spleen to paraspinal muscle on T1WI and T2WI decreased with the increasing stage of anemia and decreasing hemoglobin levels (P<0.001). The ratios of the liver to paraspinal muscle on T1WI, spleen to paraspinal muscle on T1WI, and the liver and spleen to paraspinal muscle on T2WI could predict anemia stage≥1 (AUC=0.576, 0.643, 0.688, and 0.756, respectively), ≥2 (AUC=0.743, 0.714, 0.891, and 0.922, respectively) and 3 (AUC=0.851, 0.822, 0.854, and 0.949, respectively).
Conclusion: T2WI-based spleen signal intensity ratios showed the highest potential for non-invasive evaluation of anemia in gynecological cancer.
Keywords: Liver, spleen, signal intensity, anemia, gynecological cancer, MRI.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.21262] [PMID: 25651787]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1570946]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20697] [PMID: 16215963]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04772.x] [PMID: 14717788]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nbm.903] [PMID: 15526352]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2002-06-1723] [PMID: 12393526]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0461-5] [PMID: 26023008]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.01294] [PMID: 30294279]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajh.23628] [PMID: 24532336]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-017-1307-0] [PMID: 29378625]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mric.2010.08.014] [PMID: 21094445]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15436-6] [PMID: 15070565]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1188/07.CJON.349-359] [PMID: 17623620]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-108859] [PMID: 27299667]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181862413] [PMID: 19002057]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3353-0] [PMID: 25097130]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.185.1.01850219] [PMID: 15972427]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13817] [PMID: 28004654]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.01.014] [PMID: 22306005]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2015.09.006] [PMID: 26437604]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/iub.1628] [PMID: 28480557]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tracli.2017.06.015] [PMID: 28694024]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2013.10.008] [PMID: 24275533]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-2977(00)00003-6] [PMID: 10727758]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra050436] [PMID: 16162884]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00335-011-9344-4] [PMID: 21732193]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.179.2.2014275] [PMID: 2014275]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2014.05.027] [PMID: 24993364]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/rg.2018170079] [PMID: 29528818]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.1994.tb04888.x] [PMID: 7947241]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20816] [PMID: 17326089]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21204] [PMID: 17390359]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0609.2005.00474.x] [PMID: 16104881]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.04838.x]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.mph.0000212915.22265.3b] [PMID: 16772883]