Generic placeholder image

Infectious Disorders - Drug Targets

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1871-5265
ISSN (Online): 2212-3989

Research Article

Vaginal States: Detection of Conversion Processes in Women Using Contraception and Characterization of Vaginal Lactobacillus Species

Author(s): Sonia Elena María Fosch*, Marta Lucia Trossero, Omar Agustin Grosso, Ana Paula Reyes, Silvina Ema Cocucci, Sandra Noemí Payalef and Beatriz Elizabeth Perazzi

Volume 22, Issue 4, 2022

Published on: 24 February, 2022

Article ID: e260122200531 Pages: 9

DOI: 10.2174/1871526522666220126154731

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: The vaginal microenvironment, regulated by an immune system, can be protected or altered by many factors, including contraceptive methods.

Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of contraceptive methods on the basic vaginal states (BVSs) and to identify culturable vaginal Lactobacillus species.

Methods: This is a prospective, consecutive, longitudinal, and descriptive study. The vaginal contents of 208 women were sampled prior to initiating contraception and six months later. The BVSs were established using the balance of vaginal content (BAVACO) methodology that evaluates microbiota and vaginal inflammatory reaction (VIR). Lactobacillus species were characterized by biochemical tests and mass spectrometry. The following contraceptive methods were evaluated: combined oral contraceptive pill (COCP), condom (CON) and rhythm method (RHYT). McNemar's test was used.

Results: Of the 208 women, 171 attended both examinations. In the COCP group (n=127), 83 vaginal contents maintained a normal microbiota, 1 sample became dysbiotic, and 37/43 dysbiotic microbiota samples reverted to normal (p<0.0001). A conversion to BVS with VIR was detected in the CON group (n=31) (p=0.001). The RHYT group (n=13) maintained its initial BVSs. The predominant Lactobacillus species found were L. crispatus and L. gasseri, with a trend toward a positive association between L. crispatus and COCP (OR=2.82; p=0.058).

Conclusion: Hormone administration corrected the dysbiosis and preserved a normal BVS. The CON increased the VIR. The protection of the microbiota observed in the rhythm method probably responds to a systemic hormonal influence. The trend toward a positive association between COCP and L. crispatus, with its protective properties, evidenced an effective hormonal relationship.

Keywords: Basic vaginal states, contraception, conversion processes, vaginal microbiota, vaginal inflammatory reaction, Lactobacillus species.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
Gupta K, Hillier SL, Hooton TM, Roberts PL, Stamm WE. Effects of contraceptive method on the vaginal microbial flora: A prospective evaluation. J Infect Dis 2000; 181(2): 595-601.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/315267] [PMID: 10669343]
[2]
Achilles SL, Austin MN, Meyn LA, Mhlanga F, Chirenje ZM, Hillier SL. Impact of contraceptive initiation on vaginal microbiota. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 218(6): 622.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.017] [PMID: 29505773]
[3]
Bradshaw CS, Brotman RM. Making inroads into improving treatment of bacterial vaginosis - striving for long-term cure. BMC Infect Dis 2015; 15(1): 292.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-1027-4] [PMID: 26219949]
[4]
Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol 1991; 29(2): 297-301.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jcm.29.2.297-301.1991] [PMID: 1706728]
[5]
Lamont RF, Sobel JD, Akins RA, et al. The vaginal microbiome: New information about genital tract flora using molecular based techniques. BJOG 2011; 118(5): 533-49.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02840.x] [PMID: 21251190]
[6]
Ravel J, Gajer P, Abdo Z, et al. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108(Suppl. 1): 4680-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1002611107] [PMID: 20534435]
[7]
Li J, McCormick J, Bocking A, Reid G. Importance of vaginal microbes in reproductive health. Reprod Sci 2012; 19(3): 235-42.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1933719111418379] [PMID: 22383775]
[8]
Bacova erige procedures manual. PROSAR Program, Fundación Bioquímica Argentina. Report. 2019 Available from:. https://www.fba.org.ar/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/MANUAL-DE-PROCEDIMIENTOS-BACOVA-2018.pdf (Accessed on August 21, 2021).
[9]
Perazzi BE, Menghi CI, Coppolillo EF, et al. Prevalence and comparison of diagnostic methods for Trichomonas vaginalis infection in pregnant women in Argentina. Korean J Parasitol 2010; 48(1): 61-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2010.48.1.61] [PMID: 20333287]
[10]
Schleifer KH, Family I. Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology 2nd Ed Berlin: Speringer. 2009; 3: pp. 465-511.
[11]
Morales A, Maritato A, de Torres RA, Ortega Soler ER. Frequency of vaginal dysfunction (vaginosis/vaginitis) in women of childbearing age, symptomatic and asymptomatic (MEF). Obstet Ginecol Lat Am 2010; 57(2): 74-84.
[12]
Perazzi BE, Maldonado V, Losada M, et al. Evaluation by basic vaginal states of vaginal dysfunction according to different risk factors and characterization of the lactobacillary microbiota. RByPC 2018; 82(1): 58-71.
[13]
Javed A, Parvaiz F, Manzoor S. Bacterial vaginosis: An insight into the prevalence, alternative treatments regimen and it’s associated resistance patterns. Microb Pathog 2019; 127: 21-30.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2018.11.046] [PMID: 30502515]
[14]
Joshi S, Mane A, Muwonge R, et al. Prevalence and predictors of bacterial vaginosis in HIV-infected women in Maharashtra, India. Int J STD AIDS 2020; 31(6): 541-52.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956462419878333] [PMID: 32233718]
[15]
Donders GG, Vereecken A, Bosmans E, Dekeersmaecker A, Salembier G, Spitz B. Definition of a type of abnormal vaginal flora that is distinct from bacterial vaginosis: Aerobic vaginitis. BJOG 2002; 109(1): 34-43.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.00432.x] [PMID: 11845812]
[16]
Fosch S, Yones C, Trossero M, Grosso O. Influence of the contraceptive method on the profile of vaginal function in a social microenvironment. ABCL 2011; 45(4): 763-72.
[17]
Fosch SE, Ficoseco CA, Marchesi A, Cocucci S, Nader-Macias MEF, Perazzi BE. Contraception: Influence on vaginal microbiota and identification of vaginal Lactobacilli using MALDI-TOF MS and 16S rDNA sequencing. Open Microbiol J 2018; 12: 218-29.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874285801812010218] [PMID: 30069261]
[18]
Vodstrcil LA, Hocking JS, Law M, et al. Hormonal contraception is associated with a reduced risk of bacterial vaginosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2013; 8(9): e73055.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073055] [PMID: 24023807]
[19]
Smith SB, Ravel J. The vaginal microbiota, host defence and reproductive physiology. J Physiol 2017; 595(2): 451-63.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/JP271694] [PMID: 27373840]
[20]
O’Hanlon DE, Come RA, Moench TR. Vaginal pH measured in vivo: Lactobacilli determine pH and lactic acid concentration. BMC Microbiol 2019; 19(1): 13.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-019-1388-8] [PMID: 30642259]
[21]
Gorodeski GI, Hopfer U, Liu CC, Margles E. Estrogen acidifies vaginal pH by up-regulation of proton secretion via the apical membrane of vaginal-ectocervical epithelial cells. Endocrinology 2005; 146(2): 816-24.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/en.2004-1153] [PMID: 15498880]
[22]
Verstraelen H, Swidsinski A. The biofilm in bacterial vaginosis: Implications for epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment: 2018 update. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2019; 32(1): 38-42.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0000000000000516] [PMID: 30507674]
[23]
Ventolini G. Vaginal Lactobacillus: Biofilm formation in vivo - clinical implications. Int J Womens Health 2015; 7(7): 243-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S77956] [PMID: 25733930]
[24]
Ferrer J. Vaginal candidosis: Epidemiological and etiological factors. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2000; 71(Suppl. 1): S21-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(00)00350-7] [PMID: 11118561]
[25]
Perry AM, Hernday AD, Nobile CJ. Unraveling how Candida albicans forms sexual biofilms. J Fungi (Basel) 2020; 6(1): 14.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof6010014] [PMID: 31952361]
[26]
Marfatia YS, Patel D, Menon DS, Naswa S. Genital contact allergy: A diagnosis missed. Indian J Sex Transm Dis AIDS 2016; 37(1): 1-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7184.180286] [PMID: 27190404]
[27]
Turovskiy Y, Sutyak Noll K, Chikindas ML. The aetiology of bacterial vaginosis. J Appl Microbiol 2011; 110(5): 1105-28.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.04977.x] [PMID: 21332897]
[28]
Amann RI, Ludwig W, Schleifer KH. Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol Rev 1995; 59(1): 143-69.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mr.59.1.143-169.1995] [PMID: 7535888]
[29]
Tshikantwa TS, Ullah MW, He F, Yang G. Current trends and potential applications of microbial interactions for human welfare. Front Microbiol 2018; 9: 1156.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01156] [PMID: 29910788]
[30]
Gajer P, Brotman RM, Bai G, et al. Temporal dynamics of the human vaginal microbiota. Sci Transl Med 2012; 4(132): 132ra52.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3003605] [PMID: 22553250]
[31]
Ma L, Lv Z, Su J, et al. Consistent condom use increases the colonization of Lactobacillus crispatus in the vagina. PLoS One 2013; 8(7): e70716.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070716] [PMID: 23894682]
[32]
Song YL, Kato N, Matsumiya Y, Liu CX, Kato H, Watanabe K. Identification of and hydrogen peroxide production by fecal and vaginal Lactobacilli isolated from Japanese women and newborn infants. J Clin Microbiol 1999; 37(9): 3062-4.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.37.9.3062-3064.1999] [PMID: 10449509]
[33]
Marrazzo JM, Antonio M, Agnew K, Hillier SL. Distribution of genital Lactobacillus strains shared by female sex partners. J Infect Dis 2009; 199(5): 680-3.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/596632] [PMID: 19199538]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy