Abstract
Background: Transcutaneous partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PtCO2) monitorization provides a continuous and non-invasive measurement of partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO2). In addition, peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) can also be measured and followed by this method. However, data regarding the correlation between PtCO2 and arterial pCO2 (PaCO2) measurements acquired from peripheric arterial blood gas is controversial.
Objective: We aimed to determine the reliability of PtCO2 with PaCO2 based on its advantages, like non-invasiveness and continuous applicability.
Methods: Thirty-five adult patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure admitted to our tertiary medical intensive care unit (ICU) were included. Then we compared PtCO2 and PaCO2 and both SpO2 measurements simultaneously. Thirty measurements from the deltoid zone and 26 measurements from the cheek zone were applied.
Results: PtCO2 could not be measured from the deltoid region in 5 (14%) patients. SpO2 and pulse rate could not be detected at 8 (26.7%) of the deltoid zone measurements. Correlation coefficients between PtCO2 and PaCO2 from deltoid and the cheek region were r: 0,915 and r: 0,946 (p = 0,0001). In comparison with the Bland-Altman test, difference in deltoid measurements was -1,38 ± 1,18 mmHg (p = 0.252) and in cheek measurements it was -5,12 ± 0,92 mmHg (p = 0,0001). There was no statistically significant difference between SpO2 measurements in each region.
Conclusion: Our results suggest that PtCO2 and SpO2 measurements from the deltoid region are reliable compared to the arterial blood gas analysis in hypercapnic ICU patients. More randomized controlled studies investigating the effects of different measurement areas, hemodynamic parameters, and hemoglobin levels are needed.
Keywords: Transcutaneous partial pressure of carbon dioxide, intensive care unit, critical care, carbon dioxide monitoring, partial arterial pressure of carbon dioxide, peripheral oxygen saturation.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197106032842202] [PMID: 5573833]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198911023211804] [PMID: 2677729]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/adc.2002.016261] [PMID: 14736638]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198905183202004] [PMID: 2535633]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198607173150303] [PMID: 3088448]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4187/respcare.04283] [PMID: 26786741]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1817-1737.84776] [PMID: 21977067]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4187/respcare.03917]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-015-9810-8] [PMID: 26628269]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201311-387FR] [PMID: 24701974]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.128.3.1291] [PMID: 16162720]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.04987.x] [PMID: 17381578]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2012.03.033] [PMID: 22795407]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000181734.26070.26] [PMID: 16215371]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2010.11.010] [PMID: 21131188]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2010.06.021] [PMID: 20851636]