Abstract
Background: Novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia remains a matter of concern. Chest CT findings of COVID-19 pneumonia have been reported widely, while there is relatively rare research on chest X-ray (CXR).
Objective: The study was aimed to compare the CXR and chest CT findings of patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection and to explore their respective clinical values.
Methods: 28 inpatients with COVID-19 pneumonia who underwent both CXR and CT were included. The pulmonary manifestations of the lesions were recorded. Ground-glass opacity (GGO), consolidation, and fibrosis were quantified in CXR and chest CT separately. Consistency was analyzed using Fleiss' kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient. The stages of the disease in CXR and chest CT were evaluated.
Results: Approximately 67.9% (19/28) of subjects had abnormal findings on CXR. The common manifestations in CXR were ground-glass opacities (GGO) (100%, 19/19) and consolidation (68.4%, 13/19). 92.9% (26/28) of patients had abnormal manifestations on CT. The common manifestations in CT were GGO (88.5%, 23/26), consolidation (69.2%, 18/26), reticular opacity (69.2%, 18/26) and nodule (46.2%, 12/26). Among the abnormalities between CXR and CT, only consolidation was consistent (κ=0.510). GGO (ICC=0.501) and consolidation (ICC=0.431) scores were consistent in CXR and chest CT. The results of staging were the same in 14 cases, most of them were in stage I and stage II. While in other cases with inconsistent results, CT was more advanced in the disease stage than CXR, mainly stage III and stage IV.
Conclusion: CXR is helpful to observe the change of the pulmonary lesions in patients with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia. CT can be used for early diagnosis and staging of lesions.
Keywords: SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, chest X-ray (CXR), CT, consistency, clinical value.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.04.003] [PMID: 32272262]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2020.98009] [PMID: 32817769]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200230] [PMID: 32017661]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2462070712] [PMID: 18195376]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thx.2004.023762] [PMID: 15454656]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7] [PMID: 32007143]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2001017] [PMID: 31978945]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25722] [PMID: 32096567]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa030781] [PMID: 12690092]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01244-13] [PMID: 23678167]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.1960] [PMID: 32207807]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5] [PMID: 31986264]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.041] [PMID: 32283155]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.2648] [PMID: 32091533]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0994] [PMID: 32167524]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.1585] [PMID: 32031570]
[PMID: 32563999]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.2783] [PMID: 32105304]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26114] [PMID: 32492212]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200490] [PMID: 32083985]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200463] [PMID: 32077789]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30086-4] [PMID: 32105637]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06731-x] [PMID: 32055945]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200343] [PMID: 32049601]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.05.006] [PMID: 32423888]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2020.07.011] [PMID: 32659413]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-020-01200-3] [PMID: 32358689]