Generic placeholder image

Current Medical Imaging

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4056
ISSN (Online): 1875-6603

Research Article

Study of Lateral Wall Thickness of the Maxillary Sinus in Left and Right Sides for Female and Male: A Cross Sectional Retrospective Study Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Author(s): Nasser Raqe Alqhtani, Ali Robaian Alqahtani, Abdulaziz Maree Alqahtani, Faisal Nahar Alazemi, Abdulelah Mohammed Shukr, Adel Alzahrani, Abdulrahman Khalid Almalki, Bassel Tarakji*, Adel Alenzi and Khaled M. Alzahrani

Volume 18, Issue 8, 2022

Published on: 25 February, 2022

Article ID: e081221198657 Pages: 7

DOI: 10.2174/1573405617666211208124122

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: Dental implants are considered the first option to replace missing teeth. Alveolar bone resorption gradually progresses following tooth extraction leading to loss of vertical bone dimension for implant placement. The lateral window approach is the most commonly used procedure to treat vertical bone loss.

Objective: The aim of the present study is to evaluate the Lateral Wall Thickness (LWT) of the maxillary sinus and determine the influence of gender and side on maxillary LWT.

Methods: This study involved a cross sectional retrospective study. Cone- beam computed tomography data were collected from 99 patients with a total of 198 maxillary sinuses that met the inclusion criteria. The patient age ranged between 18 to 35 years. On the selected sagittal section, the points of measurement are determined by a perpendicular line at 5 mm from the lowest point of the sinus floor. Measurements were taken at four different areas; first premolar (P1), second premolar (P2), first molar (M1), and second molar (M2). Descriptive statistics were used to calculate mean lateral wall thickness for each tooth, and student’s t-test was used to test the effect of gender and side on maxillary LWT.

Results: The greatest mean LWT was observed around the left first maxillary molar (2.43±0.82), while the lowest mean LWT was observed around the right second maxillary premolar (1.62±0.61). There was no significant difference in the LWT around any tooth (M1 p=0.56, M2 p=0.92, P1 p=0.14, P2 p=0.19).

Conclusion: There was no significant difference in both males and females of the lateral wall thickness in the left and right side of maxillary sinus.

Keywords: Cone-beam computed tomography, maxillary sinus, lateral wall, lift procedure, ridge resorption, dental implant.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
Hansson S, Halldin A. Alveolar ridge resorption after tooth extraction: A consequence of a fundamental principle of bone physiology. J Dent Biomech 2012; 3: 1758736012456543.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1758736012456543] [PMID: 22924065]
[2]
Karacayli U, Dikicier E, Dikicier S. Dental implant placement in inadequate posterior maxilla. In: Turkyilmaz I, Ed. Current Concepts in Dental Implantology. London, UK: IntechOpen 2015.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/59458]
[3]
Wallace SS, Froum SJ. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol 2003; 8(1): 328-43.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.328] [PMID: 14971260]
[4]
Obiechina N. A minimally invasive way to increase bone for dental implant placement in the posterior maxilla and prevent sinus membrane perforation for single and multiple teeth replacements. J Med – Clin Res Rev 2019; 3(3): 1-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.33425/2639-944X.1092]
[5]
Helmy M. Maxillary sinus lifting: review of the two main approaches. Global J Oto 2017; 8(4): 555745.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.19080/GJO.2017.08.555745]
[6]
Lim E, Ngeow W, Lim D. The implications of different lateral wall thicknesses on surgical access to the maxillary sinus. Braz Oral Res 2017; 31: e97.
[7]
Huang YT, Hu SW, Huang JY, Chang YC. Assessment of relationship between maxillary sinus membrane thickening and the adjacent teeth health by cone-beam computed tomography. J Dent Sci 2021; 16(1): 275-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2020.05.002] [PMID: 33384809]
[8]
Ghaffari A, Mozaffari A, Nikbin M, Mobini M. Age-related alteration in the lateral wall thickness of the maxillary sinus in partially or completely edentulous posterior maxilla: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Dent Hypotheses 2019; 10(4): 91.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/denthyp.denthyp_16_19]
[9]
Mallya S, Lam E. Evolve resources for white and pharoah's oral radiology. In: White SC, Pharoah MJ, Eds. Oral Radiology: Principles and Interpretation. 7th ed. Maryland Heights, Missouri: Mosby 2019.
[10]
Monje A, Catena A, Monje F, et al. Maxillary sinus lateral wall thickness and morphologic patterns in the atrophic posterior maxilla. J Periodontol 2014; 85(5): 676-82.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2013.130392] [PMID: 24304226]
[11]
Kiakojori A, Nasab SPM, Abesi F, Gholinia H. Radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus lateral wall thickness in edentulous posterior maxilla. Electron Physician 2017; 9(12): 5948-53.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.19082/5948] [PMID: 29560146]
[12]
Li J, Zhou ZX, Yuan H, Shen M, Sun C, Chen N. A study of maxillary sinus lateral wall thickness of Han population in Jiangsu region using cone-beam CT. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 2013; 22(5): 537-41.
[PMID: 24233205]
[13]
Krennmair G, Krainhöfner M, Schmid-Schwap M, Piehslinger E. Maxillary sinus lift for single implant-supported restorations: A clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22(3): 351-8.
[PMID: 17622000]
[14]
Starch-Jensen T, Jensen JD. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation: A review of selected treatment modalities. J Oral Maxillofac Res 2017; 8(3): e3.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2017.8303] [PMID: 29142655]
[15]
Esfahanizadeh N, Rokn AR, Paknejad M, Motahari P, Daneshparvar H, Shamshiri AR. Comparison of lateral window and osteotome techniques in sinus augmentation: Histological and histomorphometric evaluation. J Dent 2012; 9(3): 237-46.
[16]
Danesh-Sani SA, Movahed A, ElChaar ES, Chong Chan K, Amintavakoli N. Radiographic evaluation of maxillary sinus lateral wall and posterior superior alveolar artery anatomy: A cone-beam computed tomographic study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2017; 19(1): 151-60.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.12426] [PMID: 27238049]
[17]
Talo Yildirim T, Güncü GN, Colak M, Tözüm TF. The relationship between maxillary sinus lateral wall thickness, alveolar bone loss, and demographic variables: A cross-sectional cone-beam computerized tomography study. Med Princ Pract 2019; 28(2): 109-14.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000494325] [PMID: 30296784]
[18]
Fokas G, Vaughn VM, Scarfe WC, Bornstein MM. Accuracy of linear measurements on CBCT images related to presurgical implant treatment planning: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018; 29(S16)(Suppl. 16): 393-415.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.13142] [PMID: 30328204]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy