Abstract
Background: In recent years, T1 mapping imaging based on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has resulted in new research and clinical applications in hepatic diseases.
Objective: The objective of the study is to analyze, prospect, and summarize the Gd-EOB-DTPA- enhanced MRI T1 mapping technology in hepatic diseases in recent years.
Main Findings: Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced T1 mapping has been used more frequently in liver diseases regardless of 1.5T or 3.0T MRI equipment. Volume interpolated body examination (VIBE) mapping sequence seems to be the recommended MRI scan sequence. In the evaluation of T1 value on liver function, the hepatobiliary phase 10 minutes after enhancement is the recommended time point. The fat fraction and hepatic steatosis grade based on MRI-derived biomarkers are easier to implement and popularize than a liver biopsy. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI T1 mapping can not only be used to evaluate the degree of liver injury, the stage of liver fibrosis, and the liver reserve function of patients with liver cirrhosis but also to distinguish focal liver lesions and predict the differentiation degree of hepatocellular carcinoma. At the same time, it has some value in predicting tumor immunohistochemical indexes, such as Ki67, CD34.
Conclusion: Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI T1 mapping has great potential in the application of diffuse and focal liver lesions. It is a quantitative study, trying to select homogeneous research objects and try to use the same standards in scanning sequence and scanning time, especially for the study of liver function, which is a focus of future research. The research on the relationship between T1 value and tumor immunohistochemical indexes is worth consideration.
Keywords: Gd-EOB-DTPA, T1 mapping, magnetic resonance imaging, liver fibrosis, liver function, liver cirrhosis.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/mco.2015.512] [PMID: 26137266]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3108-y] [PMID: 24531844]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2861]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5380-8] [PMID: 29713782]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2018.01.024] [PMID: 29410377]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i11.1208] [PMID: 32231424]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018180051] [PMID: 29944086]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2012.06.026] [PMID: 22884242]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-017-0192-x] [PMID: 28249571]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep41429] [PMID: 28128291]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep43347] [PMID: 28266528]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep.28431] [PMID: 26707365]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2017.06.003] [PMID: 28642059]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2021.03.015] [PMID: 33798658]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59601-3]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12072-014-9595-8] [PMID: 25788184]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3913-y] [PMID: 26205638]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i36.4985] [PMID: 23049206]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2015.03.039] [PMID: 26232376]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.245] [PMID: 25869468]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27822]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109789] [PMID: 34051684]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-016-0669-7] [PMID: 27449761]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25440] [PMID: 27563840]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-021-01382-4] [PMID: 34105102]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1143-2] [PMID: 28396918]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i18.2024] [PMID: 29760545]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1827.1994.tb02947.x] [PMID: 7804430]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26974] [PMID: 31675163]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2020.100312] [PMID: 33392362]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.18918] [PMID: 29029443]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2607-4] [PMID: 27520833]
[PMID: 29254310]