Generic placeholder image

Current Medical Imaging

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4056
ISSN (Online): 1875-6603

Research Article

The Feasibility of Low-dose Chest CT Acquisition Protocol for the Imaging of COVID-19 Pneumonia

Author(s): Eray Atlı*, Sadık Ahmet Uyanık, Umut Öğüşlü, Halime Çevik Cenkeri, Birnur Yılmaz and Burçak Gümüş

Volume 18, Issue 1, 2022

Published on: 23 June, 2021

Article ID: e230621194222 Pages: 7

DOI: 10.2174/1573405617666210623124108

Price: $65

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of low-dose chest CT acquisition protocol for the imaging of COVID 19 disease or suspects of this disease in adults.

Methods: In this retrospective case-control study, the study group consisted of 141 patients who were imaged with low dose chest CT acquisition protocol. The control group consisted of 92 patients who were imaged with standard protocol. Anteroposterior and lateral diameters of chest, effective diameter and scan length, qualitative and quantitative noise levels, volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose length product (DLP), and size-specific dose estimations were compared between groups.

Results: Radiation dose reduction by nearly 90% (CTDIvol and DLP values 1.06 mGy and 40.3 mGy.cm vs. 8.07 mGy and 330 mGy.cm, respectively; p < 0.001) was achieved with the use of low-dose acquisition chest CT protocol. Despite higher image noise with low-dose acquisition protocol, no significant effect on diagnostic confidence was encountered. Cardiac and diaphragm movement-related artifacts were similar in both groups (p=0.275). Interobserver agreement was very good in terms of diagnostic confidence assessment.

Conclusion: For the imaging of COVID-19 pneumonia or suspects of this disease in adults, lowdose chest CT acquisition protocol provides remarkable radiation dose reduction without adversely affecting image quality and diagnostic confidence.

Keywords: Chest CT, COVID-19, CTDIvol, DLP, low dose, pneumonia, radiation protection.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
Organization. WH. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak Available at: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel- coronavirus-2019
[2]
Albahri AS, Hamid RA, Alwan JK, et al. Role of biological data mining and machine learning techniques in detecting and diagnosing the novel coronavirus (COVID-19): A systematic review. J Med Syst 2020; 44(7): 122.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10916-020-01582-x] [PMID: 32451808]
[3]
Albahri OS, Zaidan AA, Albahri AS, et al. Systematic review of artificial intelligence techniques in the detection and classification of COVID-19 medical images in terms of evaluation and benchmarking: Taxonomy analysis, challenges, future solutions and methodological aspects. J Infect Public Health 2020; 13(10): 1381-96.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2020.06.028] [PMID: 32646771]
[4]
Albahri AS, Al-Obaidi JR, Zaidan AA, et al. Multi-biological laboratory examination framework for the prioritization of patients with covid-19 based on integrated AHP and Group VIKOR methods. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 2020; 19: 1247-69.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219622020500285]
[5]
Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, et al. China medical treatment expert group for Covid-19. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in china. N Engl J Med 2020; 382(18): 1708-20.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2002032] [PMID: 32109013]
[6]
Fang Y, Zhang H, Xie J, et al. Sensitivity of Chest CT for COVID-19: Comparison to RT-PCR. Radiology 2020; 296(2): E115-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200432] [PMID: 32073353]
[7]
Li M. Chest CT features and their role in COVID-19. Radiol Infect Dis 2020; 7(2): 51-4.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrid.2020.04.001]
[8]
Dangis A, Gieraerts C, De Bruecker Y, et al. Accuracy and reproducibility of low-dose submillisievert chest CT for the diagnosis of COVID-19. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging 2020; 2(2): e200196.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/ryct.2020200196]
[9]
Lei J, Li J, Li X, Qi X. CT Imaging of the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Pneumonia. Radiology 2020; 295(1): 18.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200236] [PMID: 32003646]
[10]
Chung M, Bernheim A, Mei X, et al. CT Imaging Features of 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Radiology 2020; 295(1): 202-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200230] [PMID: 32017661]
[11]
Inui S, Jitsu M, Kunishima N, et al. Chest CT Findings in Cases from the Cruise Ship “Diamond Princess” with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging 2020; 2(2): e200110.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/ryct.2020200110]
[12]
Ai T, Yang Z, Hou H, et al. Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 Cases. Radiology 2020; 296(2): E32-40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200642] [PMID: 32101510]
[13]
Atlı E. High pitch Computed Tomography effect on radiation dose in pediatric patients. Thesis 2013.
[14]
Christner JA, Kofler JM, McCollough CH. Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194(4): 881-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.3462] [PMID: 20308486]
[15]
American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM). Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations: The report of AAPM Task Group 204 2011. Available at: http://www.aapm.org/ pubs/reports/RPT_204.pdf
[16]
Kang Z, Li X, Zhou S. Recommendation of low-dose CT in the detection and management of COVID-2019. Eur Radiol 2020; 30(8): 4356-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06809-6] [PMID: 32193637]
[17]
Kubo T, Ohno Y, Nishino M, et al. iLEAD study group. Low dose chest CT protocol (50 mAs) as a routine protocol for comprehensive assessment of intrathoracic abnormality. Eur J Radiol Open 2016; 3: 86-94.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2016.04.001] [PMID: 27957519]
[18]
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP). Reference levels and achievable doses in medical and dental imaging: Recommendations for the United States, Report No 172 Bethesda, Md: NCRP 2012.
[19]
Kanal KM, Butler PF, Sengupta D, Bhargavan-Chatfield M, Coombs LP, Morin RLUS. U.S. Diagnostic Reference Levels and Achievable Doses for 10 Adult CT Examinations. Radiology 2017; 284(1): 120-33.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017161911] [PMID: 28221093]
[20]
Badawy MK, Galea M, Mong KS, U P. Computed tomography overexposure as a consequence of extended scan length. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2015; 59(5): 586-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.12339] [PMID: 26176642]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy