Cesarean Section Rates before and after the Implementation of Health Sector
Evolution Plan in Iran: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis

Abbas       Alipour; Leyla       Khazaei; Soheila       Khodakarim

doi:10.2174/1573404817666210604105751

Abstract

Introduction: Today, the issue that is challenging cesarean delivery is its overuse as the conventional method of birth in the world, especially in developing countries. The Iranian health system implemented the Health Sector Evolution Plan (HSEP) in 2014 to reduce CS rates.

Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of the implementation of the HSEP on the rate of CS in an Iranian subpopulation (Qom province) in 13 years.

Methods: In this longitudinal retrospective study, the trend of CS rate over 13 years (2005-2017) in Qom province has been studied by using an interrupted time series analysis.

Results: In the period after implementation of the HSEP, the rate of CS decreases by 0.1% monthly compared to the previous period, which was not statistically significant. This trend is more definite among governmental hospitals. In contrast, the pattern observed in non-governmental hospitals has a monthly increased trend.

Conclusion: After more than four years of implementation of the HSEP, it has not been able to significantly reduce the overall CSs during this period in Qom province and has failed to reach the plan's goals.

Keywords: Cesarean section, natural vaginal delivery, health sector evolution plan, interrupted time series, trend analysis, health system evaluation.

Graphical Abstract

[1] 
Seetha Panicker CT. Analysis of cesarean delivery rates using the ten group classification system in a tertiary care hospital. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol  2016; 5(9): 3153-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20163004] 
[2] 
Boatin AA, Cullinane F, Torloni MR, Betrán AP. Audit and feedback using the Robson classification to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review. BJOG  2018; 125(1): 36-42.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14774] [PMID: 28602031] 
[3] 
Grylka-Baeschlin S, Hess TH, Erdin R, Prentl E, Pehlke-Milde J. Availability and accessibility of perinatal data for the Robson classification of caesarean sections in Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly  2018; 148(0304): w14578.
[PMID: 29376551] 
[4] 
Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang J, et al. What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies. Reprod Health  2015; 12(1): 57.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-015-0043-6] [PMID: 26093498] 
[5] 
Mascarello KC, Horta BL, Silveira MF. Maternal complications and cesarean section without indication: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Saude Publica  2017; 51: 105.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/S1518-8787.2017051000389] [PMID: 29166440] 
[6] 
Shakibazadeh E, Bayat R, Tahernejad A, Sepehri S. Frequency of, and indications for the first time C-section in Zanjan, Iran. Nursing Practice Today  2014; 1(4): 207-12.
[7] 
Maharlouei N, Moalaee M, Ajdari S, Zarei M, Lankarani KB. Caesarean delivery in south-western Iran: Trends and determinants in a community-based survey. Med Princ Pract  2013; 22(2): 184-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000341762] [PMID: 22922349] 
[8] 
Jamshidi Evanaki F, Khakbazan Z, Babaei G, T Noori S. Reasons of choosing cesarean section as the delivery method by the pregnant women referred to health treatment centers in Rasht. J Hayat  2004; 10(3): 50-60.
[9] 
Akbarzadeh F, Talaei A, Tavassoli F, et al. Psychological characteristics of women with vaginal delivery, elective and emergency cesarean section. Med J Mashhad Univ Med Sci  2016; 58(10): 611-9.
[10] 
Education, M.o.H.a.M., Country Guide for Obstetrics / Gynecology Services / Author's Compilation; Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Office of Family and Population Health, Maternal Health Department. 2012.
[11] 
Dahlke JD, Mendez-Figueroa H, Wenstrom KD. Counselling women about the risks of caesarean delivery in future pregnancies. Obstet Gynaecol  2014; 16(4): 239-44.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tog.12144] 
[12] 
Sajadi HS, Zaboli R. An Assessment of the Positive Effects of Health Reform Plan Implementation from the Perspective of Hospital Directors. HIM J  2016; 13(1): 55-60.
[13] 
Piroozi B, Moradi G, Esmail Nasab N, Ghasri H, Farshadi S, Farhadifar F. Evaluating the effect of health sector evolution plan on cesarean rate and the average costs paid by mothers: A case study in Kurdistan province between 2013-2015. J Hayat  2016; 22(3): 245-54.
[14] 
Aghayousefi A, Amirpour B, Alipour A, Zare H. Assessment of changes in cesarean indications before and after the implementation of health sector evolution plan in pregnant women referred to Nezam-Mafi hospital, Shoush, Khoozestan province in 2013-2014. Pajoohande  2016; 20(6): 320-6.
[15] 
Bernal JL, Cummins S, Gasparrini A. Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: A tutorial. Int J Epidemiol  2017; 46(1): 348-55.
[PMID: 27283160] 
[16] 
Hutcheon JA, Strumpf EC, Harper S, Giesbrecht E. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after implementation of a hospital policy to limit low-risk planned caesarean deliveries before 39 weeks of gestation: An interrupted time-series analysis. BJOG  2015; 122(9): 1200-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13396] [PMID: 25851865] 
[17] 
Karami Matin B, Hajizadeh M, Najafi F, Homaie Rad E, Piroozi B, Rezaei S. The impact of health sector evolution plan on hospitalization and cesarean section rates in Iran: An interrupted time series analysis. Int J Qual Health Care  2018; 30(1): 75-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzx169] [PMID: 29272503] 
[18] 
Behzadifar M, Behzadifar M, Bakhtiari A, et al. The effect of the health transformation plan on cesarean section in Iran: A systematic review of the literature. BMC Res Notes  2019; 12(1): 37.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4081-y] [PMID: 30658686] 
[19] 
Rashidian A, Moradi G, Takian A, et al. Effects of the Health Transformation Plan on caesarean section rate in the Islamic Republic of Iran: An interrupted time series. East Mediterr Health J  2019; 25(4): 254-61.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.26719/emhj.18.044] [PMID: 31210346] 
[20] 
Ahmad Nia S, Delavar B, Eini Zinab H, Kazemipour S, Mehryar AH, Naghavi M. Caesarean section in the Islamic Republic of Iran: prevalence and some sociodemographic correlates. East Mediterr Health J  2009; 15(6): 1389-98.
[21] 
Sadat Z. Reasons for elective cesarean section in Iranian women. Nurs Midwifery Stud  2014; 3(3): e22502.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.17795/nmsjournal22502] [PMID: 25699287] 
[22] 
Moradi-Lakeh M, Vosoogh-Moghaddam A. Health sector evolution plan in Iran; Equity and sustainability concerns. Int J Health Policy Manag  2015; 4(10): 637-40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2015.160] [PMID: 26673172] 
[23] 
Zarei E, Majidi S, Bay V. Achievement of health sector evolution objectives in the vaginal delivery promotion plan: A study in a large public hospital in Tehran. J  Health Admin Educ  2017; 3(2): 27-32.

Rights & Permissions Print Cite

Article Metrics

11

Journal Information

For Authors

For Editors

For Reviewers

Explore Articles

Open Access

Open Access Articles

For Visitors

DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573404817666210604105751	Print ISSN 1573-4048
Publisher Name Bentham Science Publisher	Online ISSN 1875-6581

Current Women`s Health Reviews

Cesarean Section Rates before and after the Implementation of Health Sector Evolution Plan in Iran: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis

Abstract Play Pause

Graphical Abstract

Abstract