Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Current Medical Imaging

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4056
ISSN (Online): 1875-6603

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Review Article

Methods of Masseter and Temporal Muscle Thickness and Elasticity Measurements by Ultrasound Imaging: A Literature Review

Author(s): Gabriela Blicharz, Małgorzata Rymarczyk, Mateusz Rogulski and Paweł Linek*

Volume 17, Issue 6, 2021

Published on: 14 December, 2020

Page: [707 - 713] Pages: 7

DOI: 10.2174/1573405616666201214121557

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: The positive correlation between changes in the morphology of masseter and temporal muscles and some disorders, inclines diagnosticians to search for an effective method of assessing muscle thickness and elasticity. Ultrasound imaging, as a relatively simple and cheap method, seems to be a useful diagnostic tool.

Objective: The aim of this study was to present the existing ultrasound imaging methods in the assessment of the elasticity and thickness of the masseter and temporal muscles.

Methods: The literature review has been done with a focus on the accurate description of the masseter and/or temporal muscle examination by ultrasonography imaging methods. Articles were categorized into two groups. The first group included articles in which muscle thickness was assessed by ultrasound imaging. The second group concerned the elasticity aspect of mentioned muscles.

Results: It is difficult to achieve an objective protocol of masseter and temporal thickness assessment by ultrasonography and there is no method that has been fully verified in terms of reliability. The shear-wave sonoelastography revealed higher-level reliability of masseter muscle elasticity than strain sonoelastography. During the shear-wave sonoelastography, the effect of scan plane in relation to masseter muscle pennation and the day-to-day variation were statistically significant. With regard to elasticity of temporal muscle, further research is needed.

Conclusion: This review has shown that there is a limited number of methods for masseter and temporal muscle thickness and elasticity measurements by ultrasonography. All procedures (methods) were not fully verified in terms of reliability and agreement. Thus, it is still necessary to develop standardized procures to assess thickness and elasticity of the masseter and temporal muscles with appropriate reliability and accuracy.

Keywords: Elastography, ultrasound imaging, masseter muscle, temporal muscle, stiffness, muscle geometry.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
Toro-Ibacache V, Zapata MuÑoz V, O’higgins P. The predictability from skull morphology of temporalis and masseter muscle cross-sectional areas in humans. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2015; 298(7): 1261-70.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ar.23156] [PMID: 25810234]
[2]
Okeson JP. Management of Temporomandibular Disorders and Occlusion. Lublin: Czelej, Inc. 2018.
[3]
Costa YM, Ariji Y, Ferreira DMAO, et al. Muscle hardness and masticatory myofascial pain: Assessment and clinical relevance. J Oral Rehabil 2018; 45(8): 640-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joor.12644] [PMID: 29745983]
[4]
Ashina M, Bendtsen L, Jensen R, Sakai F, Olesen J. Muscle hardness in patients with chronic tension-type headache: relation to actual headache state. Pain 1999; 79(2-3): 201-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00167-5] [PMID: 10068165]
[5]
Kashima K, Igawa K, Maeda S, Sakoda S. Analysis of muscle hardness in patients with masticatory myofascial pain. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 64(2): 175-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.10.012] [PMID: 16413887]
[6]
Woźniak K, Piątkowska D. Wykorzystanie elektromiografii w ortopedii szczękowej – systematyczny przegląd badań oryginalnych. Dental Forum. 42(1): 75-82.
[7]
Gawlak D, Łuniewska J. Zastosowanie elektromiografii powierzchniowej w stomatologii – przegląd piśmiennictwa. Protet Stomatol 2014; 64(5): 369-76.
[8]
Linek P. Could changes in the ultrasound image of the muscles of the lateral abdominal wall be seen as a sign of muscle activity? A narrative review. Eur J Clin Exp Med 2017; 15: 59-65.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.15584/ejcem.2017.1.9]
[9]
Weijs WA, Hillen B. Relationships between masticatory muscle cross-section and skull shape. J Dent Res 1984; 63(9): 1154-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345840630091201] [PMID: 6589280]
[10]
Hannam AG, Wood WW. Relationships between the size and spatial morphology of human masseter and medial pterygoid muscles, the craniofacial skeleton, and jaw biomechanics. Am J Phys Anthropol 1989; 80(4): 429-45.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330800404] [PMID: 2603948]
[11]
Satiroğlu F, Arun T, Işik F. Comparative data on facial morphology and muscle thickness using ultrasonography. Eur J Orthod 2005; 27(6): 562-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cji052] [PMID: 16135538]
[12]
Kerins CM, Moore SD, Butterfield TA, McKeon PO, Uhl TL. Reliability of the myotonometer for assessment of posterior shoulder tightness. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2013; 8(3): 248-55.
[PMID: 23772341]
[13]
Pamukoff DN, Bell SE, Ryan ED, Blackburn JT. The myotonometer: Not a valid measurement tool for active hamstring musculotendinous stiffness. J Sport Rehabil 2016; 25(2): 111-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2014-0271] [PMID: 25389783]
[14]
Hiraiwa Y, Ariji Y, Kise Y, Sakuma S, Kurita K, Ariji E. Efficacy of massage treatment technique in masseter muscle hardness: robotic experimental approach. Cranio 2013; 31(4): 291-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/crn.2013.31.4.007] [PMID: 24308103]
[15]
Sigrist RMS, Liau J, Kaffas AE, Chammas MC, Willmann JK. Ultrasound elastography: Review of techniques and clinical applications. Theranostics 2017; 7(5): 1303-29.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/thno.18650] [PMID: 28435467]
[16]
Gheonea IA, Stoica Z, Bondari S. Differential diagnosis of breast lesions using ultrasound elastography. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2011; 21(4): 301-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.90697] [PMID: 22223946]
[17]
Ariji Y, Nakayama M, Nishiyama W, Nozawa M, Ariji E. Shear-wave sonoelastography for assessing masseter muscle hardness in comparison with strain sonoelastography: study with phantoms and healthy volunteers. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2016; 45(2): 20150251.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20150251] [PMID: 26624000]
[18]
Serra MD, Duarte Gavião MB, dos Santos Uchôa MN. The use of ultrasound in the investigation of the muscles of mastication. Ultrasound Med Biol 2008; 34(12): 1875-84.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.05.009] [PMID: 18774217]
[19]
Raadsheer MC, Kiliaridis S, Van Eijden TM, Van Ginkel FC, Prahl-Andersen B. Masseter muscle thickness in growing individuals and its relation to facial morphology. Arch Oral Biol 1996; 41(4): 323-32.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(95)00136-0] [PMID: 8771323]
[20]
Park KM, Choi E, Kwak EJ, et al. The relationship between masseter muscle thickness measured by ultrasonography and facial profile in young Korean adults. Imaging Sci Dent 2018; 48(3): 213-21.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2018.48.3.213] [PMID: 30276158]
[21]
Strini PJ, Strini PJ, Barbosa TdeS, Gavião MB. Assessment of thickness and function of masticatory and cervical muscles in adults with and without temporomandibular disorders. Arch Oral Biol 2013; 58(9): 1100-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2013.04.006] [PMID: 23684155]
[22]
Volk GF, Sauer M, Pohlmann M, Guntinas-Lichius O. Reference values for dynamic facial muscle ultrasonography in adults. Muscle Nerve 2014; 50(3): 348-57.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mus.24204] [PMID: 24519557]
[23]
Soyoye OA, Otuyemi OD, Kolawole KA, Ayoola OO. Relationship between masseter muscle thickness and maxillofacial morphology in pre-orthodontic treatment patients. Int Orthod 2018; 16(4): 698-711.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2018.09.015] [PMID: 30348502]
[24]
Takashima M, Arai Y, Kawamura A, Hayashi T, Takagi R. Quantitative evaluation of masseter muscle stiffness in patients with temporomandibular disorders using shear wave elastography. J Prosthodont Res 2017; 61(4): 432-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2017.01.003] [PMID: 28188109]
[25]
Ewertsen C, Carlsen J, Perveez MA, Schytz H. Reference Values for Shear Wave Elastography of Neck and Shoulder Muscles in Healthy Individuals. Ultrasound Int Open 2018; 4(1): E23-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-102013] [PMID: 29629427]
[26]
Damian L, Botar Jid C, Rogojan L, et al. Unilateral temporal myositis heralding polymyositis: ultrasonographic and elastographic findings. Case report. Med Ultrason 2016; 18(1): 123-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.11152/mu.2013.2066.181.boj] [PMID: 26962566]
[27]
Kiliaridis S, Engvall M, Tzakis MG. Ultrasound imaging of the masseter muscle in myotonic dystrophy patients. J Oral Rehabil 1995; 22(8): 619-25.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1995.tb01059.x] [PMID: 7472735]
[28]
Prabhu NT, Munshi AK. Ultrasonographic observation of the circumoral musculature: an in-vivo study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1995; 19(3): 195-203.
[PMID: 8611489]
[29]
Kiliaridis S, Kälebo P. Masseter muscle thickness measured by ultrasonography and its relation to facial morphology. J Dent Res 1991; 70(9): 1262-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345910700090601] [PMID: 1918575]
[30]
Frey H. Realtime elastography. A new ultrasound procedure for the reconstruction of tissue elasticity. Radiologe 2003; 43(10): 850-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00117-003-0943-2] [PMID: 14605701]
[31]
Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, et al. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 2006; 239(2): 341-50.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2391041676] [PMID: 16484352]
[32]
Gotoh A, Ariji Y, Hasegawa T, et al. Sonographic elastography for assessing changes in masseter muscle elasticity after low-level static contraction. Oral Radiol 2013; 29(2): 140-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11282-012-0119-8]
[33]
Nakayama M, Ariji Y, Nishiyama W, Ariji E. Evaluation of the masseter muscle elasticity with the use of acoustic coupling agents as references in strain sonoelastography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2015; 44(3): 20140258.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20140258] [PMID: 25411712]
[34]
Ariji Y, Gotoh A, Hiraiwa Y, Kise Y, Nakayama M, Nishiyama W, et al. Sonographic elastography for evaluation of masseter muscle hardness. Oral Radiol 2013; 29: 64-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11282-012-0111-3]
[35]
Drakonaki EE, Allen GM, Wilson DJ. Ultrasound elastography for musculoskeletal applications. Br J Radiol 2012; 85(1019): 1435-45.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr/93042867] [PMID: 23091287]
[36]
Umemoto T, Ueno E, Matsumura T, et al. Ex vivo and in vivo assessment of the non-linearity of elasticity properties of breast tissues for quantitative strain elastography. Ultrasound Med Biol 2014; 40(8): 1755-68.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.02.005] [PMID: 24802305]
[37]
Chino K, Akagi R, Dohi M, Fukashiro S, Takahashi H. Reliability and validity of quantifying absolute muscle hardness using ultrasound elastography. PLoS One 2012; 7(9): e45764.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045764] [PMID: 23029231]
[38]
Niitsu M, Michizaki A, Endo A, Takei H, Yanagisawa O. Muscle hardness measurement by using ultrasound elastography: a feasibility study. Acta Radiol 2011; 52(1): 99-105.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/ar.2010.100190] [PMID: 21498334]
[39]
Yanagisawa O, Niitsu M, Kurihara T, Fukubayashi T. Evaluation of human muscle hardness after dynamic exercise with ultrasound real-time tissue elastography: a feasibility study. Clin Radiol 2011; 66(9): 815-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2011.03.012] [PMID: 21529793]
[40]
Badea I, Tamas-Szora A, Chiorean I, Fildan F, Ciulea E, Badea M. Quantitative assessment of the masseter muscle’s elasticity using Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse. Med Ultrason 2014; 16(2): 89-94.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.11152/mu.201.3.2066.162.ib1asz2] [PMID: 24791838]
[41]
Winn N, Lalam R, Cassar-Pullicino V. Sonoelastography in the musculoskeletal system: Current role and future directions. World J Radiol 2016; 8(11): 868-79.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v8.i11.868] [PMID: 27928468]
[42]
Svensson P, Graven-Nielsen T. Craniofacial muscle pain: review of mechanisms and clinical manifestations. J Orofac Pain 2001; 15(2): 117-45.
[PMID: 11443825]
[43]
Murayama M, Watanabe K, Kato R, Uchiyama T, Yoneda T. Association of muscle hardness with muscle tension dynamics: a physiological property. Eur J Appl Physiol 2012; 112(1): 105-12.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-1959-3] [PMID: 21499883]
[44]
Masi AT, Hannon JC. Human resting muscle tone (HRMT): narrative introduction and modern concepts. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2008; 12(4): 320-32.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2008.05.007] [PMID: 19083691]
[45]
Simons DG, Mense S. Understanding and measurement of muscle tone as related to clinical muscle pain. Pain 1998; 75(1): 1-17.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00102-4] [PMID: 9539669]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
Article Metrics
26
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy