Abstract
Background: MicroRNAs (miRs) have been shown to play important roles in various cancers and may be a reliable prognostic marker. However, its prognostic value in endometrial carcinoma (UCEC) needs to be further explored.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to create a miR-based signature to effectively predict the prognosis for patients with uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma (UCEC).
Methods: Using UCEC data set in TCGA, we identified differentially expressed miRs between UCEC and healthy endometrial tissues. The LASSO method was used to construct a miR-based signature prognosis index for predicting prognosis in the training cohort. The miR-based signature prognosis index was validated in an independent test cohort. MiRNet tool was applied to perform functional enrichment analysis of this miR-based signature.
Results: A total of 208 miRs were differentially expressed between UCEC and healthy endometrial tissues. Five miRs (miR-652, miR-3170, miR-195, miR-34a, and miR-934) were identified to generate a prognosis index (PI). The five-miR signature is a promising biomarker for predicting the 5-year-survival rate of UCEC with AUC = 0.730. The PI remained an independent prognostic factor adjusted by routine clinicopathologic factors. Using the PI, we could successfully identify the high-risk individuals, furthermore, it still worked in an independent test cohort. The five miRs involved in various pathways associated with cancer.
Conclusion: We proposed and validated a five-miR signature that could serve as an independent prognostic predictor of UCECs.
Keywords: Uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma, gynaecology tumor, microRNA signature, prognosis, risk stratification system, TCGA.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29210] [PMID: 25220842]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00668-6] [PMID: 9491858]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.07.003] [PMID: 16887175]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000462977.61229.de] [PMID: 25798986]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0090-8258(83)90111-7] [PMID: 6822361]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30094] [PMID: 27308732]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00045-5] [PMID: 14744438]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2007.04.002] [PMID: 17531469]
[PMID: 26854447]
[PMID: 28193082]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S155016] [PMID: 29317831]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1705-y] [PMID: 22851141]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.27117] [PMID: 30405833]
[PMID: 30171046]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3236] [PMID: 29514841]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv007] [PMID: 25605792]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S191637] [PMID: 31417313]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970228)16:4<385:AID-SIM380>3.0.CO;2-3] [PMID: 9044528]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00337.x] [PMID: 10877287]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw288] [PMID: 27105848]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.1239303] [PMID: 14597658]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12113] [PMID: 23636398]
[PMID: 29567372]
[PMID: 28740575]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035158] [PMID: 22514717]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrd.2016.246] [PMID: 28209991]