Abstract
Background: The specific Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIG) for Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) is developing, which contains a high level of naturally occurring autoantibodies against amyloid-β (nAbs-Aβ), and the measure of nAbs-Aβ content is greatly essential. Though Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) has been widely used in detecting the nAbs-Aβ content, the impact of Aβ aggregates species chosen as antigen in ELISA on this measure has not been evaluated.
Objective: To clarify the influence of different Aβ40/42 aggregates as antigen during ELISA on the content of nAbs-Aβ40/42 measured in IVIG.
Method: Preparation of various Aβ40/42 aggregates was performed by different aggregation solutions and various lengths of time, and analyzed by western blot. Different Aβ40/42 aggregates as antigen were adopted to measure the nAbs-Aβ40/42 content in IVIG by ELISA, and the control was carried out to reduce interference of nonspecific binding. The Bonferroni and Dunnett’s T3 were used for statistical analysis.
Results: The duration for the formation of Aβ40/42 aggregates had more effect on detecting nAbs-Aβ40/42 content in IVIG than the aggregation solution. Higher content of nAbs-Aβ40/42 in the same IVIG was displayed when measured with Aβ40/42 aggregates at day 3, instead of at day 0.5 and day 7.0. The nAbs- Aβ40/42 contents in the same IVIG measured with Aβ40/42 aggregates prepared in different solutions were obviously different, but there was no significant regularity among them.
Conclusion: The nAbs-Aβ40/42 content in the same IVIG is significantly different when measured with Aβ40/42 aggregated under different conditions. The nAbs-Aβ40/42 content in IVIG by antigen-dependent measures, like ELISA, is uncertain.
Keywords: Naturally occurring autoantibodies against amyloid-β, intravenous immunoglobulin, Alzheimer's disease, measure, amyloid β-protein, aggregate.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2017.05.002] [PMID: 29067343]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.001]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1389557518666171215150024] [PMID: 29243575]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2018.03.009] [PMID: 29955663]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2007.04.381] [PMID: 19595937]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2165/11533070-000000000-00000] [PMID: 20329802]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2016.09.023] [PMID: 28041678]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000003904] [PMID: 28381506]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10875-014-0041-4] [PMID: 24760112]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/156720501107140815102453] [PMID: 25156573]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12974-014-0198-z] [PMID: 25476011]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1567205016666190827122009] [PMID: 31453788]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-2094-7-90] [PMID: 21138577]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1808-05.2005] [PMID: 16148231]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-2094-9-105] [PMID: 22642812]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/trf.14908] [PMID: 30284288]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2016.10.018] [PMID: 27792896]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1567205011666140812113851] [PMID: 25115544]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10875-014-0020-9] [PMID: 24760109]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ana.10253] [PMID: 12210803]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2016.02.015] [PMID: 26907803]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2017.02.024] [PMID: 28231531]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03407.x] [PMID: 16135089]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.05.001] [PMID: 20452375]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2003.033399] [PMID: 15377700]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.12.021] [PMID: 18294736]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70014-0] [PMID: 23375965]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2015-311486] [PMID: 26420886]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4933-10-18] [PMID: 23663286]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10875-014-0039-y] [PMID: 24781637]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2007.04.021]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.01.018] [PMID: 20097229]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-2010-1353] [PMID: 20164596]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2009.10.005] [PMID: 19840873]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imlet.2013.07.008] [PMID: 23928186 ]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn.3028] [PMID: 22286176]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M210207200] [PMID: 12499373 ]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.05.011] [PMID: 21741125]