Generic placeholder image

New Emirates Medical Journal

Editor-in-Chief
ISSN (Online): 0250-6882

Research Article

The Use of Intermittent Non-Invasive Ventilation as an Alveolar Recruitment Method for Patient with Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia

Author(s): Mazen Zouwayhed, Saria Gouher, Balu Bhaskar, Moeena Zain, Samer Burghleh, Rania Khani, Razan Yousef, Abdul Rahman Khan and Naim Aoun

Volume 3, Issue 1, 2022

Published on: 27 December, 2021

Article ID: e290922199524 Pages: 5

DOI: 10.2174/03666211227175233

open_access

conference banner
Abstract

Background: The use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) as a therapy for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) secondary to COVID-19 pneumonia has been controversial. NIV is an aerosol generating procedure which may increase the risk of viral transmission amongst patients and staff. Because of fear of aerosolizing the virus and transmitting the disease, initial expert recommendation was to avoid NIV and proceed with early intubation. With further experience of the virus, this recommendation has been challenged and NIV has been used widely with some retrospective studies quoting between 11 to 56 percent of COVID-19 related respiratory failures being treated with NIV.

Objective: The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of using non-invasive mechanical ventilation as an alveolar recruitment method for patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. This method was used by our respiratory team on selected patients during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: We reviewed the charts of patients that were admitted to the American Hospital Dubai intensive care unit, or our medical step-down unit who had diffuse bilateral infiltrates requiring oxygen supplementation between March and October 2020. We identified patients who were on intermittent BiPAP in addition to standard care. We also monitored the rate of infection among staff taking care of these patients.

Results: Average length of stay after starting BIPAP therapy was 6.8 days, while the average total length of stay was 13.6 days. Only one patient was transferred to the ICU after being on the BIPAP protocol and did not need intubation. All patients were discharged home either without oxygen or with their chronic baseline home oxygen requirement. Radiological improvement in aeration was seen in 100% of patients at follow-up x-ray postintervention. There were no reported pulmonary complications from barotrauma, such as pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum. There were no reported cases of staff infection to the health care workers that were taking care of these patients.

Conclusion: Our first of its kind observational study showed clearly that using BIPAP therapy for one hour three times daily during nebulization therapy in addition to standard care resulted in a significant reduction in hospital length of stay and hastened the clinical and radiological improvement of patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia.

Keywords: COVID-19, BIPAP, Pneumonia, ARDS, Length of stay, Non-invasive mechanical ventilation COVID-19, Non-invasive ventilation.

[1]
Phelan AL, Katz R, Gostin LO. The novel coronavirus originating in Wuhan, China: Challenges for global health governance. JAMA 2020; 323(8): 709-10.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.1097] [PMID: 31999307]
[2]
World Health Organization. COVID-19 Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) global research and innovation forum. 2020.
[3]
Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: Summary of a report of 72 314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA 2020; 323(13): 1239-42.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.2648] [PMID: 32091533]
[4]
Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: A descriptive study. Lancet 2020; 395(10223): 507-13.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7] [PMID: 32007143]
[5]
Gupta S, Hayek SS, Wang W, et al. Factors associated with death in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in the US. JAMA Intern Med 2020; 180(11): 1436-47.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3596] [PMID: 32667668]
[6]
Ruan Q, Yang K, Wang W, Jiang L, Song J. Clinical predictors of mortality due to COVID-19 based on an analysis of data of 150 patients from Wuhan, China. Intensive Care Med 2020; 46(5): 846-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-05991-x] [PMID: 32125452]
[7]
Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, et al. Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes among 5700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the New York City area. JAMA 2020; 323(20): 2052-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.6775] [PMID: 32320003]
[8]
Karagiannidis C, Mostert C, Hentschker C, et al. Case characteristics, resource use, and outcomes of 10 021 patients with COVID-19 admitted to 920 German hospitals: An observational study. Lancet Respir Med 2020; 8(9): 853-62.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30316-7] [PMID: 32735842]
[9]
Schünemann HJ, Khabsa J, Solo K, et al. Ventilation techniques and risk for transmission of coronavirus disease, including COVID-19: A living systematic review of multiple streams of evidence. Ann Intern Med 2020; 173(3): 204-16.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/M20-2306] [PMID: 32442035]
[10]
Marini JJ, Gattinoni L. Management of COVID-19 respiratory distress. JAMA 2020; 323(22): 2329-30.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.6825] [PMID: 32329799]
[11]
Caution about early intubation and mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 Martin J. Tobin, Franco Laghi & Amal Jubran. Ann Intensive Care 2020; 10: 78.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00692-6]
[12]
Emmanuel GE, Smith WM, Briscoe WA. The effect of intermittent positive pressure breathing and voluntary hyperventilation upon the distribution of ventilation and pulmonary blood flow to the lung in chronic obstructive lung disease. J Clin Invest 1966; 45(7): 1221-33.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI105428] [PMID: 5338606]
[13]
Characteristics and outcomes in adult patients receiving mechanical ventilationa 28-day international study andrés esteban, MD, PhD. JAMA 2002; 287(3): 345-55.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.3.345] [PMID: 11790214]
[14]
Grasselli G, Zangrillo A, Zanella A, et al. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of 1591 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to ICUs of the lombardy region, italy. JAMA 2020; 323(16): 1574-81.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.5394] [PMID: 32250385]
[15]
Raquel S Santos, Pedro L Silva, Paolo Pelosi, and Patricia RM Rocco. Recruitment manoeuvres in acute respiratory distress syndrome: The safe way is the best way. World J Crit Care Med 2015; 4(4): 278-86.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v4.i4.278] [PMID: 26557478]
[16]
Mascheroni D, Kolobow T, Fumagalli R, Moretti MP, Chen V, Buckhold D. Acute respiratory failure following pharmacologically induced hyperventilation: An experimental animal study. Intensive Care Med 1988; 15(1): 8-14.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00255628] [PMID: 3230208]
[17]
NHS guidance on use of NIV in adults with coronavirus | Intensive Review In: Author: Dr Matthew Durie Peer reviewers: Dr Vinodh Nanjayya, Dr Lloyd Roberts, and Prof Andrew Udy. 1988.
[18]
Carteaux G, Millán-Guilarte T, De Prost N, et al. Failure of noninvasive ventilation for de novo acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: Role of tidal volume. Crit Care Med 2016; 44(2): 282-90.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000001379] [PMID: 26584191]
[19]
Campbell EJ, Friend J. Action of breathing exercises in pulmonary emphysema. Lancet 1955; 268(6859): 325-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(55)90062-3] [PMID: 13234370]
[20]
United Arab Emiratws ministry of health. Version 4 April 05, 2020 Clinical Assessment for patients suspects-COVID-19 2020. Available from: https://www.dha.gov.ae/en/HealthRegulation/Documents/Mana gement%20of%20a%20suspected%20case%20of%20COVIDversion%204.pdf

© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy