Abstract
Background: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) animal models have revealed neuroprotective actions of Bryostatin-1 mediated by activation of novel PKC isoforms, suppression of beta-amyloid and downregulation of inflammatory and angiogenic events, making Bryostatin-1 an attractive candidate for attenuating AD-associated neural, vascular, and cognitive disturbances.
Objective: To further enhance Bryostatin-1 efficacy, nanoparticle-encapsulated Bryostatin-1 formulations were prepared.
Methods: We compared nano-encapsulated and unmodified Bryostatin-1 in in vitro models of neuronal PKC-d, PKC-e isoforms, α-secretase and studied nano-encapsulated Bryostatin-1 in an AD mouse model of spatial memory (BC3-Tg (APPswe, PSEN1 dE9) 85Dbo/J mice).
Results: We found that nanoencapsulated Bryostatin-1 formulations displayed activity greater or equal to that of unmodified Bryostatin-1 in PKC-δ and -ε and α-secretase activation assays. We next evaluated how treatment with a nanoencapsulated Bryostatin-1 formulation facilitated spatial learning in the Morris water maze. AD transgenic mice (6.5 to 8 months of age) were treated with nanoparticle encapsulated Bryostatin-1 formulation (1, 2.5, or 5 μg/mouse) three times the week before testing and then daily for each of the 5 days of testing. Across the acquisition phase, mice treated with nanoencapsulated Bryostatin-1 had shorter latencies, increased % time in the target zone and decreased % time in the opposite quadrant. The mice were given retention testing after a 2-week period without drug treatment. Mice treated with nanoencapsulated Bryostatin-1 had shorter latencies to find the escape platform, indicating retention of spatial memory.
Conclusion: These data suggest that cognitive deficits associated with AD could be treated using highly potent nanoparticle-encapsulated formulations of Bryostatin-1.
Keywords: Alzheimer's, dementia, secretase, PKC, neurodegenerative disease, cerebral cortex.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80974-5] [PMID: 9354339]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2006.05.010] [PMID: 16829076]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1247-05.2005] [PMID: 16033885]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.029] [PMID: 23217740]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1304839] [PMID: 24450891]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12031-012-9816-3] [PMID: 22700373]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1567205012666141218141904] [PMID: 25523423]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2018.06.014] [PMID: 30406177]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00011-007-7031-4] [PMID: 18594782]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.12.021] [PMID: 15047228]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/FBP.0b013e3282feb0d2] [PMID: 18469542]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5209-10.2011] [PMID: 21228172]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.07.023] [PMID: 20817351]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/revneuro-2012-0041] [PMID: 23089603]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2010.03.022] [PMID: 20307587]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.70104] [PMID: 15169864]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.05.009] [PMID: 22717236]