Abstract
Background: Lupus nephritis (LN) represents 40%-50% of all systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients, and rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) might be involved in the pathogenesis of LN.
Objective: We evaluated the role of myeloperoxidase (MPO)-ANCA, proteinase 3 (PR3)-ANCA, and anti-glomerular basement membrane autoantibodies (anti-GBM autoAb) for the diagnosis of LN. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 95 SLE patients were divided into 2 subgroups: LN group (n = 60) and non-LN group (n = 35). For further analysis, we subclassified the LN group into ANCA- positive (n = 16) and ANCA-negative (n = 44) LN patients. The entire Non-LN group was ANCA- negative. The SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI) was reported for each patient. Determination of MPO-ANCA, PR3-ANCA, and anti-GBM autoAb was performed using a novel multiplex bead-based technology in all patients. Data analyses were done using SPSS, version 20. Approval was obtained from the institutional review board of Zagazig University (ZU-IRB#6000). Results: Of 95 patients with SLE, 16 patients (16.84%) had ANCA-positive LN, all of which were MPO-ANCA. There was a positive correlation between MPO-ANCA and SLEDAI, as well as with class IV LN. Receiver operating characteristic analyses revealed that the sensitivity and specificity of MPO-ANCA were 81.3% and 99.8%, respectively, in discriminating LN from systemic lupus without nephritis. Conclusion: MPO-ANCA level was significantly correlated with SLEDAI, inflammatory markers, kidney function tests, and LN class IV.Keywords: Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody, Anti-proteinase 3, Lupus nephritis, myeloperoxidase, clinicopathological, Systemic lupus erythematosus.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1529-0131(199810)41:10<1714::AID-ART3>3.0.CO;2-U] [PMID: 9778212]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra071297] [PMID: 18305268]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.34473] [PMID: 22553077]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60279-7] [PMID: 17307106]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-5994.1984.tb03769.x] [PMID: 6208890]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-113-9-656] [PMID: 2221646]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/ajkd.2000.17615] [PMID: 11007672]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2014.01.024] [PMID: 24456936]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra071297] [PMID: 18305268]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2007.12.001] [PMID: 18295737]
[PMID: 24854381]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.1780370206] [PMID: 8129773]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pathol-011811-132453] [PMID: 23347350]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1309/WAEPADW0K4LPUHFN] [PMID: 14502794]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.1780350606] [PMID: 1599520]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.21625] [PMID: 16453282]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0961203309358187] [PMID: 20089610]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ki.1996.528] [PMID: 8943489]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CVI.00034-07] [PMID: 17376860]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2015.00181] [PMID: 25954274]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2014.78] [PMID: 24890776]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.krcp.2015.11.002] [PMID: 27069855]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002580] [PMID: 26825903]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2014.103] [PMID: 25003769]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2015.33] [PMID: 25825084]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.6634] [PMID: 24892770]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/31.10.669] [PMID: 1393372]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000013557] [PMID: 10644870]